![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to the SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
JUST GOT DIVORCED AND HAVE TO GET BACK IN THE GYM. IM LOOKING IN TO USING CLEN. DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY SUCSESS STORIES OR BAD STORIES ON THIS STUFF.
__________________
SORRY JUST NEW TO THE GAME |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
All caps is SHOUTING. please don't. I moved your post to the correct forum. Please go read this link FOR THOSE THAT WANT HELP WITH CYCLES
my condolences on your divorce.
__________________
Looking at my own reflection, When suddenly it changes Violently it changes (oh no), There is no turning back now You've woken up the demon in me Superior Muscle Does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information shared is for learning purposes only. The Administrators, and Moderators of this site are not liable for any injury caused by the misuse of any chemical used for bodybuilding purposes. 1) DO NOT POST ASKING FOR A SOURCE!!!! 2)If you are a source, dont bother posting for business, it is clearly against the board's policy and you will be banned. 3)DO NOT PM OR EMAIL A MOD ABOUT A SOURCE! Supermod at chemicalfitness.com Mod at superiormuscle.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ive used liquid clen with much success, what brand do you have?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks
__________________
SORRY JUST NEW TO THE GAME |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
have not got it yet. have done research on it but just wanted to get some real people feed back.
__________________
SORRY JUST NEW TO THE GAME |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
you won't go wrong with fruit punch clen from the lion
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
In researching this product. I did find some interesting studies. Clenbuterol does have some effects such in Reproductive toxicity, Long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity, Skin irritation, Intramuscular tolerance. I think the study on pup birth rate in high dosages should be looked at.
I found this to be interesting.... Clenbuterol, like other ß-agonists, leads to tachycardia and hypotension. This probably results in reduced myocardial perfusion at a time when oxygen demand is high because of increased cardiac rate. The end result is hypoxia which probably leads to the necrotic lesions seen in the left ventricular papillary muscles (Rosenblum et al., 1965; De Busk & Harrison, 1969; Poynter & Spurling, 1971; Roberts & Cohen, 1972; Magnusson & Hansson, 1973; Balazs & Bloom, 1982). This explains the cardiac effects noted in the repeated dose (and other) studies with clenbuterol. Observations in humans A single blinded cross-over study was carried out to examine the acute bronchospasmolytic effect and possible side-effects following oral administration of placebo and three doses of clenbuterol (1, 2.5 and 5 µg/day) in patients (three male and three female) with chronic obstructive airway disease over a 3 day period. The drug was given orally, diluted with water. Observations were carried out over a 2-hour period following dosing. The average age of the patients was 55.7 years and they had an average body weight of 73.16 kg. None of the 3 doses produced any clear, consistent effects on bronchial resistance, thoracic gas volume, radial pulse frequency or blood pressure, and no side effects were seen. The pharmacological NOEL in this study was 5 µg/day, equivalent to 0.08 µg/kg bw per day (Kaik, 1978). The bronchospasmolytic effect was examined in two groups of patients: Group A: ten patients aged 46-75 years with chronic obstructive respiratory disease resulting from pulmonary tuberculosis. Group B: five patients aged 56-67 years with chronic obstructive respiratory disease not related to tuberculosis, plus five patients aged 34-57 with bronchial asthma. The bronchospasmolytic effect was examined after single oral doses of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 25 or 30 µg/person, and after a placebo dose. In Group A patients, intrathoracic gas volume was significantly reduced and vital capacity and pneumometer values significantly increased at all dose levels. In Group B patients, airway resistance was significantly reduced, but no dose relationship could be demonstrated. No significant placebo effect was seen in either group. When compared with placebo values, a significantly greater increase for both vital capacity and pneumometer values was observed in Group A, even at the lowest dose used in this group (5 µg). However, at the two lowest doses used in Group B (1 and 2.5 µg), there were no significant differences from placebo values. The pharmacological NOEL in this study was 2.5 µg, equivalent to 0.042 µg/kg bw (Nolte & Laumen, 1972; Nolte, 1980). Children who consumed between 0.05-0.075 mg of clenbuterol showed only mild tachycardia. A 30-year-old woman who consumed 30 tablets equivalent to 0.6 mg clenbuterol (10 µg/kg approximately) developed tachycardia and slight hypertension approximately 1 hour after consumption. No tablet remains were found on gastric lavage, and medicinal charcoal and a saline laxative were given. The following day, the patient's pulse rate and blood pressure had returned to normal (Boehringer, 1991a). Patients (100+) administered doses of 20-60 µg/day (0.3-1.0 µg/kg bw per day) for up to 1 year or 20 µg/day (0.3 µg/kg bw per day) for up to 6 months showed no adverse effects except for slight tremor and occasional, mild tachycardia (Laumen, 1978; Tullgren & Lins, 1987). 3. COMMENTS The Committee considered toxicological data on clenbuterol, including the results of acute, short-term and reproductive toxicity studies, as well as studies on teratogenicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Results of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in animals and humans were also considered. Clenbuterol is well absorbed after oral administration in a number of animal species and in humans. An oral dose is largely and rapidly excreted in the urine, and the majority of the remainder is excreted in the faeces. The biotransformation of clenbuterol is complex and a number of metabolites are formed. The major compound found in a number of species was unchanged clenbuterol. After oral administration of therapeutic doses to lactating cattle, clenbuterol was found in the milk. When radiolabelled clenbuterol was given orally to pregnant rats, dogs, baboons and cattle, radioactivity was detected in the fetuses. Clenbuterol was moderately toxic in mice and rats after oral administration, LD50 values being in the range of 80-175 mg/kg bw. It was less toxic in the dog (LD50 = 400-800 mg/kg bw). It was more toxic after parenteral administration, with LD50 values in the range of 30-85 mg/kg bw after intravenous administration. The main signs of toxicity included lethargy, tachycardia and tonic-clonic convulsions after oral administration. The main effects noted in the repeat-dose studies were tachycardia and, at higher doses, myocardial necrosis. These effects are common with ß-agonist drugs. The myocardial necrosis was considered to be secondary to hypoxia, due to reduced myocardial perfusion at a time of high oxygen demand resulting from increased cardiac rate. In 30-day repeat-dose studies in mice and rats, NOELs of 2.5 and 1 mg/kg bw per day, respectively, were identified, largely based on cardiac lesions. However, in a range of repeat-dose studies in rats using doses of 0.01 to 100 mg/kg bw per day for durations of up to 18 months, administered through the oral, intravenous and inhalation routes, no NOELs were identified. Effects were usually related to cardiac function and were seen even at the lowest doses used. Similarly, no NOELS could be identified in a range of repeat-dose oral studies in dogs. These studies used doses ranging from 0.1 to 40 mg/kg bw per day. In a 26-week inhalation study in cynomolgus monkeys, the NOEL was 25 µg/kg bw per day, based on a number of observations including cardiac effects. No evidence of carcinogenicity was noted in a two-year oral study in mice with doses of up to 25 mg/kg bw per day. In a two-year study with doses of up to 25 mg/kg bw per day in the Chbb:THOM rat, no evidence of carcinogenicity was seen. However, in Sprague-Dawley rats given 25 mg clenbuterol/kg bw per day orally for 2 years, an increased incidence of mesovarian leiomyomas occurred. With the related compounds salbutamol in rats and medroxalol in mice, the effects could be abolished by administration of the ß-blocking agent propranolol. Mesovarian leiomyomas in rats and uterine leiomyomas in mice are known to occur following long-term treatment with ß-adrenoceptor agonists and the Committee concluded that these were due to adrenergic stimulation and not to any genotoxic mechanism. Clenbuterol was not genotoxic in a range of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies. Epidemiological studies indicate that there have been no increased incidences of uterine leiomyomas in women following the use of ß-adrenoceptor agonists. Clenbuterol had no effects on fertility in a reproductive toxicity study in rats using oral doses of 1-50 mg/kg bw per day from 10 weeks prior to mating in males and two weeks prior to mating in females. However, doses of 50 mg/kg bw per day resulted in the deaths of pups soon after birth. To investigate the cause of the high pup mortality at this dose level, the litters of control dams were exchanged with those from dams given 50 mg/kg bw per day. Pups from rats given 50 mg/kg bw per day died on the first day of lactation regardless of whether they suckled on treated or control dams. The mechanism involved in this lethal effect is unknown. A NOEL was not identified in this study, because pup weights at birth were reduced in all treated animals. In a reproductive toxicity study in which male rats were treated with 1.5-15 µg clenbuterol/kg bw per day orally for 70 days prior to mating and females with the same dose range for 14 days prior to mating, no adverse effects on reproduction were noted. The NOEL was 15 µg/kg bw per day. In teratogenicity studies in rats, oral doses of 10 and 100 mg/kg bw per day produced teratogenic effects that included hydrocephalus, anasarca, umbilical hernia, anophthalmia, rib variations and splintering of vertebrae. These were accompanied by signs of maternal toxicity. The NOEL was 1 mg/kg bw per day. In three studies in rabbits using doses of 30 µg to 50 mg per kg bw per day, signs of feto- toxicity, including delayed ossification and cleft palate, occurred. The NOEL was 30 µg/kg bw per day. Clenbuterol produced a range of pharmacodynamic effects in a number of animal species including tachycardia, hypertension and muscle relaxing effects. These were seen at single doses as low as 0.8 µg/kg bw. Four metabolites of clenbuterol that had been shown to be present in the kidneys of treated target animals were tested for pharmaco- logical activity. Of these, only one (N-A 1141) was shown to have activity. Its broncholytic effect in the guinea-pig was less than 20% that of clenbuterol. In addition, it accounted for only 1-2% of residues in the liver and kidney of target animals 6 hours after treatment. In humans, clenbuterol produced a bronchiolytic effect when a single dose of 10 µg (0.167 µg/kg bw) was given by the inhalation route, but no evidence of tachycardia was seen at this dose. With oral doses of clenbuterol of up to 5 µg/day (0.08 µg/kg bw per day) over a 3-day period, there were no effects on bronchial resistance, thoracic gas volume, cardiac rate or blood pressure. The NOEL in this study was 5 µg/day (0.08 µg/kg bw per day). In a study to investigate the bronchospasmolytic effect in humans, patients with obstructive lung disease were given oral doses of up to 30 µg per person. Patients administered doses of 5 µg or more exhibited bronchospasmolytic effects, and the pharmacological NOEL in this study was 2.5 µg per person, equivalent to 0.04 µg/kg bw. Clen almost reminds me of the selectivness of nolvadex and clomid. Being clen's selective binding to ß2-adrenoceptors on uterine smooth muscle cell membranes. Clenbuterol is a ß-adrenoceptor agonist that exerts a potent bronchiolytic effect by preferential action on ß2-adrenoceptors in smooth muscle, resulting in the relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle and a decrease in airway resistance. Similarly, through selective binding to ß2-adrenoceptors on uterine smooth muscle cell membranes, relaxation of the uterus (tocolysis) occurs. Here are two excellent reading matierials on animal and human studies. I read through most of it and have yet to completely understand the differences. http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecf...no/v38je02.htm http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/vet/mrls/003095en.pdf Clen is usually ran 2 weeks on 2 weeks off. In your off time run what is called an ECA stack (Ephedrine, Caffeine, Aspirin). This has a thermogenic and anabolic effect as well. Clen can be run for post cycle treatment to help retain gains because it is anti-catabolic. Clen properties are known to have thermogenic effects (raise body temp) and nerve stimulant. Clen effects the main nervous system.
__________________
IBE Forum Admin |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|