is it possible to get better results with ala than with rala?

[minitor2]

i tried the rala and i wasent that impressed with it i couldnt get myself to get hypo at all likei could eaisly with the regular ala. is it possible that i could respond better to regular ala? or am i just retarded? any ideas are appreciated

minitor2

[THE BOUNCER]

I actually heard someone else saying they like ala better as opposed to r-ala. i forget the thread though.

[bigpetefox]

Weird you mention this.. I just started R by Syntrax, too soon to say for sure it works, but regular ALA I used to get had me goin' hypo after 600mg.. I was always goin' for 1200-1800mg a day, split doses.. The R is too expensive to run that high, I'm on 400mg daily..

[hitmansb]

I find R-ala gets my hypo much faster, and at lower doses. I use Glucorel-R.

[minitor2]

bump for more answers

[prolangtum]

Both are overhyped. Yes it makes muscles cells more insulin sensitive, but it also makes fat cells more insulin sensitive too, it does not differeniate.

[superchicken]

one thing, also consider the possbility that the r ala you think your taking may be of inferior quality, or not r ala at all. so you think your taking 600 of r, but it could really be 300r and 300s. ive heard r ala degrades easily if not handled properly, i see a lot of companies putting out r ala now and wonder how many of them are truely a good product.

i tried the r ala from AF before it was called glucorel, and i thought it worked much better than reg ala. i went hypo easier, yet didnt get heartburn as easy since i was taking less total mgs.