SuperiorMuscle.com

Welcome to the SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.



Go Back   SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums > Superior Discussion Section > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-18-06, 10:17 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,834
THE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond reputeTHE BOUNCER has a reputation beyond repute
Court orders Dish Network to disable all DVR's within 30 days..

http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...1-ArticlePage3

By Paul Bond

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - A judge has ordered EchoStar to disable the digital video recorders used by several million subscribers to its Dish satellite TV service because they infringe on patents held by TiVo.

Thursday's ruling from U.S. District Judge David Folsom in Marshall, Texas, demands that within 30 days EchoStar must basically render useless all but 192,708 of the DVR units it has deployed.

The decision comes four months after a jury ruled that EchoStar should pay TiVo $74.9 million because it willfully infringed TiVo patents that allow for the digital storage of TV programming.

The judge also denied EchoStar's request that the injunction be stayed pending appeal, making it difficult for EchoStar to continue offering its subscribers' DVR functionality without striking a quick licensing deal with TiVo or another DVR maker.

While the injunction battle clearly was won by TiVo, the scrappy pioneer of the DVR industry also was handed a loss Thursday when Folsom ruled against its request that the jury award be tripled. The judge, however, ordered EchoStar to pay an additional $5.4 million in interest payments and $10.3 million in supplemental damages, bringing the amount EchoStar owes TiVo to nearly $90 million.

NO BAD FAITH

In ruling against treble damages, Folsom noted that EchoStar was not allowed to present evidence that it received outside legal advice indicating that the DVRs it created did not infringe TiVo's patents. That EchoStar sought such advice before TiVo sued it "could demonstrate a lack of willfulness" on the part of EchoStar, the judge wrote in denying TiVo's request of treble damages.

"The evidence does not show the defendants acted in bad faith, nor does the jury's willfulness finding amount to a finding of bad faith," Folsom wrote.

In asking for an injunction, TiVo argued that, while it would become extinct if unable to protect its patents and sell its DVRs, EchoStar's primary business of satellite TV transmissions does not depend on its ability to offer DVRs.

EchoStar claimed, among other arguments, that TiVo's motive in filing a lawsuit was to gain additional leverage over EchoStar and other prospective business partners in order to strike lucrative licensing deals.

The vast majority of TiVo subscribers, in fact, come by way of a licensing agreement with EchoStar competitor DirecTV. Another agreement with cable giant Comcast Corp. won't bear fruit until later this year, and TiVo has had trouble lining up other big players in the pay TV market, who mostly have been offering their customers generic DVRs.

Siding with TiVo, Folsom wrote that one thing both companies agreed on is that DVR customers are "sticky," meaning that once they obtain a DVR they stick with it, so business that TiVo has been losing to EchoStar might not be recovered without a ruling of infringement.

'CRITICAL TIME'

TiVo, the judge wrote, "is losing market share at a critical time in the market's development -- market share that it will not have the same opportunity to capture once the market matures."

EchoStar also claimed that the timing of TiVo's lawsuit -- several years after EchoStar began selling DVRs -- amounted to proof that it was not suffering irreparable injury. Folsom, though, noted that TiVo hadn't sued EchoStar sooner because it was trying to enter into a business deal with it.

EchoStar also said an injunction would unduly hurt its business, an argument Folsom was not entirely unsympathetic to -- though, again, he came down on the side of TiVo.

"Although the injunction will likely result in some degree of customer loss and will impact (EchoStar's) ability to compete in the market, (EchoStar) will not be irreparably harmed," he wrote.

Folsom's ruling was filed after the close of regular and after-hours trading on Wall Street, so it did not affect the share prices of EchoStar and TiVo. When TiVo won its jury trial in April, its shares moved up 23 percent in after-hours trading, though the stock has since given back much of that gain.

TiVo shares closed up fractionally Thursday to $6.49, while EchoStar shares fell 1.1 percent to $32.75.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 08-23-06, 11:19 PM
hitmansb's Avatar
Superior Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,580
hitmansb is a jewel in the roughhitmansb is a jewel in the roughhitmansb is a jewel in the rough
Hmmm... I wonder if the other copycats are going to get hit. I know there are Canadian satellite and digital cable companies that have DVR built into their receivers as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-06, 06:35 AM
babyblues's Avatar
Superior Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,092
babyblues is an unknown quantity at this point
This is just another case of one company abusing the system to make more money. Wouldn't it be better for the CONSUMER to share the technology? No, it's better for their fucking bank accounts and their friggin investors if they hog it all to themselves. They could be satisfied with their settlement and demand royalties in the future, but they don't have to make them recall their product.
__________________
...

Remember, today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
-- Dale Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-06, 02:41 PM
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 145
freakinhuge is on a distinguished road
My DVR is through dish network. NO MORE DVR THAT TOTALLY SUCKS.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-06, 01:33 PM
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 69
Konitz is on a distinguished road
I hope they do not go after Comcast's DVR I finally have All the world strongest man's from 1999 on saved up in there.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com and Modified by Schucz

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Superiormuscle.com Does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information shared is for learning purposes only. The Administrators, and Moderators of this site are not liable for any injury caused by the misuse of any chemical used for bodybuilding purposes.