SuperiorMuscle.com

Welcome to the SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.



Go Back   SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums > Superior Fitness Section > Nutrition

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-14-04, 12:53 PM
redsquirrel's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Underneath the squat rack
Posts: 3,243
redsquirrel has a spectacular aura aboutredsquirrel has a spectacular aura aboutredsquirrel has a spectacular aura about
Quick Oats vs. Rolled Oats

So, I was doing some reading over the weekend and read somewhere that quick oats have a higher GI than unprocessed rolled oats. Does anyone have any info on this?

I can see both sides....Like since they are quick oats, they are processed, stripping some of the nutrients. But can stripping nutrients actually have a higher GI effect?

Those rolled oats take forever to cook....
__________________
Any information divulged by this member is strictly hypothetical and in no way reflects upon this member. This member does not promote the use of any illegal drugs. Redsquirrel is a fictional character.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 09-14-04, 01:42 PM
Stonecold54's Avatar
Superior Admiral
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,471
Stonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to beholdStonecold54 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Quick Oats vs. Rolled Oats

Quote:
Originally posted by redsquirrel
So, I was doing some reading over the weekend and read somewhere that quick oats have a higher GI than unprocessed rolled oats. Does anyone have any info on this?

I can see both sides....Like since they are quick oats, they are processed, stripping some of the nutrients. But can stripping nutrients actually have a higher GI effect?

Those rolled oats take forever to cook....
well I would think the more simple a product is the faster it gets broken down/absorbed. The more processed something is the more ready it is to be taken up in the blood stream quickly with minimum processing by the body.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-04, 01:47 PM
king's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: new forkin jersey
Posts: 106
king
Whatever you were reading could've been talking about the flavored quick oats which I'm sure you know are packed full of sugar and garbage. The regular plain old quick oats are nothing more than cut up portions of the large rolled oats which allows them to be cooked a little faster. I compared the ingredients and they are exactly the same, 100% rolled oats.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-04, 02:07 PM
redsquirrel's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Underneath the squat rack
Posts: 3,243
redsquirrel has a spectacular aura aboutredsquirrel has a spectacular aura aboutredsquirrel has a spectacular aura about
That's what I was thinking....that it was the flavor packets...I thought the article said it was plain quick oats. I'm with you though. Thanks for clearing it up!
__________________
Any information divulged by this member is strictly hypothetical and in no way reflects upon this member. This member does not promote the use of any illegal drugs. Redsquirrel is a fictional character.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-04, 02:46 PM
beefcake's Avatar
Superior Freak
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Step aerobics class
Posts: 4,044
beefcake will become famous soon enough
Don't know if this helps any but it's a lot of reading if you feel like it. I'm assuming the steamed thin oats are refering to quick oats and the thick oats are the rolled oats.

http://www.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/130/9/2207
__________________
"Working out is like building a house, everytime you do a half-ass workout, you're not laying a brick, someone else is." - Dorian Yates

"Man cannot remake himself without suffering, for he is both the marble and the sculptor." - Alexis Carrel

"Whenever you're not in the the gym training, someone else out there is, and when you meet them, they will beat you." - Victor Martinez
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-04, 12:19 AM
Superior Amateur
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 434
Cmsmallzz
King I wasn't aware that the regular oats are larger than the quick ones. I am looking at a Quaker instant and Quaker Traditional right now and see no difference. Is this what you were talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-04, 06:00 PM
king's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: new forkin jersey
Posts: 106
king
Quote:
Originally posted by Cmsmallzz
King I wasn't aware that the regular oats are larger than the quick ones. I am looking at a Quaker instant and Quaker Traditional right now and see no difference. Is this what you were talking about?
Hmm, I have the quaker Quick Oats and they look much smaller than traditional oats. I'm going to have to go to the store and get some regular oats so i can do a comparison pic! Do you have the Quaker Quick oats or the flavored quick oats?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-04, 09:44 PM
Superior Amateur
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 424
Jordan
sorry to add this, but ive heard several times that quick cooking oats do have a higher gi rating than normal rolled outs. my sources could be wrong but thats always been my understanding. i still eat the quick cooking variety because they're so much easier and also, they still are a whole grain carb. ill look into it more though and see if i can find out what the exact gi ratings are
__________________
-under construction-

Last edited by Jordan : 09-21-04 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-04, 02:20 PM
Superior Amateur
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 434
Cmsmallzz
Quote:
Originally posted by king
Hmm, I have the quaker Quick Oats and they look much smaller than traditional oats. I'm going to have to go to the store and get some regular oats so i can do a comparison pic! Do you have the Quaker Quick oats or the flavored quick oats?
My bad Bro...you were right and I was looking at the wrong carton. LOL...I filled an old quick oats carton with some of the traditional oats I bought in bulk.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com and Modified by Schucz

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Superiormuscle.com Does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information shared is for learning purposes only. The Administrators, and Moderators of this site are not liable for any injury caused by the misuse of any chemical used for bodybuilding purposes.