SuperiorMuscle.com

Welcome to the SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.



Go Back   SuperiorMuscle.com - Bodybuilding Forums > Superior Fitness Section > Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-27-03, 01:34 AM
TheRussian's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nor Cali
Posts: 87
TheRussian
Using BF% measuring tools

Does anyone use their own tools to measure BF%? I usually have mine measured by my personal trainer, but been thinking of getting one of those tools myself.

Anyone use those themselves, and how's the accuracy.

10x
__________________
24
5'9
192

"If you don't fail, you are not taking enough risks"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 12-27-03, 02:00 AM
Cogar's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Within 3 miles of my favorite gym.
Posts: 124
Cogar
I use an electronic BF analyzer, which is reasonably precise if you measure the same way each time--first thing in the morning after emptying your bladder and before drinking anything. I also had my BF measured by a personal trainer using a caliper and the measurement came out about 4% lower. I think this is typical, and based on the way I look in the mirror, I think my actual BF is about half way in between the two. I cannot measure myself with a caliper, though. The measurements came out all over the place. Bottom line is they are good for showing trends, but don't expect them to be dead accurate if that makes sense.
__________________
Always learning.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-03, 09:49 AM
ski's Avatar
ski ski is offline
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Upstate NY via Mass.
Posts: 87
ski is on a distinguished road
True enough Cogar.I use a BF% scale ,it`s not accurate but you can still see if you`re losinf BF by the decreasing percentages. I prefer to go by the mirroe anyway ,it never lies.If I`m ripped good ,they don`t ask me my BF% onstage anyway.
__________________
My Website:
http://www.geocities.com/timbuktuweights/

My Forum:
http://timwescott.proboards18.com/index.cgi
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-03, 10:39 PM
KeepinItReal
 
Posts: n/a
LOL Ski. Very true m brutha.

PEACE! KIR
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-03, 11:08 PM
Gizmo
 
Posts: n/a
It's my opinion that the caliper is the all around most acurate. It's been my experience that the water, scale and electronic methods are the most inacurate. The caliper may not be exact but it's the closest to exact of the above mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-03, 12:27 AM
Shibby's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,715
Shibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really nice
Quote:
Originally posted by Cogar
I use an electronic BF analyzer, which is reasonably precise if you measure the same way each time--first thing in the morning after emptying your bladder and before drinking anything. I also had my BF measured by a personal trainer using a caliper and the measurement came out about 4% lower. I think this is typical, and based on the way I look in the mirror, I think my actual BF is about half way in between the two. I cannot measure myself with a caliper, though. The measurements came out all over the place. Bottom line is they are good for showing trends, but don't expect them to be dead accurate if that makes sense.
Dehydration makes it read as a higher body fat since the signal goes through your body too slow. And if you have a significantly large base it can read as extra body fat too. I had a guy who used the eloctronic Tanita and it said he was like 28%. He didn't look anywher near that. So I went and used the calipers and he was mor like 12%
__________________


"When you understand why you reject all other gods, you will understand why I reject yours" - Stephen F. Roberts

"Religion evolves more rapidly than evolution"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-03, 12:31 AM
Shibby's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,715
Shibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really nice
Quote:
Originally posted by Gizmo
It's my opinion that the caliper is the all around most acurate. It's been my experience that the water, scale and electronic methods are the most inacurate. The caliper may not be exact but it's the closest to exact of the above mentioned.
The problems with the Hydrostatic is that alot of times people can't or won't release all the air out of there body and they float more than they should. But if done correctly is is +-< 1% accurate.
__________________


"When you understand why you reject all other gods, you will understand why I reject yours" - Stephen F. Roberts

"Religion evolves more rapidly than evolution"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-03, 03:37 AM
TheRussian's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nor Cali
Posts: 87
TheRussian
Thanks guys. I need to get myself tested. I'm around 191-192 lbs now. (I started at 165 in early summer) People say I look bigger, but I feel fatter My estimate is around 17-18%, which would mean I made decent LBM gains.
__________________
24
5'9
192

"If you don't fail, you are not taking enough risks"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-03, 03:44 AM
Shibby's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,715
Shibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really niceShibby is just really nice
Yea that's some great gains. But if you can lean out a bit more and only loose maybe a 1/4 to 1/2 inch avg in size you will hear even mor comments about looking bigger when you havn't actually gained any size. The less the muscle is washed out by fat the bigger and better it will look.
__________________


"When you understand why you reject all other gods, you will understand why I reject yours" - Stephen F. Roberts

"Religion evolves more rapidly than evolution"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-28-03, 04:59 AM
TheRussian's Avatar
Superior Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nor Cali
Posts: 87
TheRussian
Quote:
Originally posted by Shibby
Yea that's some great gains. But if you can lean out a bit more and only loose maybe a 1/4 to 1/2 inch avg in size you will hear even mor comments about looking bigger when you havn't actually gained any size. The less the muscle is washed out by fat the bigger and better it will look.
Thanks for the advice bro.

I'm gonna get up to around 196lbs or so by end of Jan, then start cutting. I plan to be in the low-mid 180s by early April.

I figure about 9 weeks of cutting to lose around 10-12lbs. Sounds realistic? (I consider myself in the middle of an ectomorph - mesomorph scale.)
__________________
24
5'9
192

"If you don't fail, you are not taking enough risks"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-28-03, 11:31 AM
Timber's Avatar
Superior Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 864
Timber is on a distinguished road
I personally use a Tanita body fat scale with an Athlete mode. It doesn't really matter what form of body fat measuring device you use as long as you use the same kind every time. I don’t believe any for is accurate but as long as you use the same method you can track gain and decrease , The bottom line is as long as my abs are ripped I'm cool
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com and Modified by Schucz

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Superiormuscle.com Does not promote the use of anabolic steroids without a doctor's prescription. The information shared is for learning purposes only. The Administrators, and Moderators of this site are not liable for any injury caused by the misuse of any chemical used for bodybuilding purposes.