steroids vs gh

[Bouncer]

for your money,,an AAS satck is FAR better. HGH is better for the well advanced athlete in conjunction with a solid AAS cycle.

agreed.

steroids first, gh second.

[Ashop]

Two very different drugs, if I had choose one I would do a cycle of AAS before I do GH plus AAS are whole lot cheaper and faster results, do a little search on this site and you'll find about a thousand threads that would answer your questions.

for your money,,an AAS satck is FAR better. HGH is better for the well advanced athlete in conjunction with a solid AAS cycle.

[Bouncer]

thanks - i was really just looking for general opinions here more than anything. i personally have never tried it and have stuck with 'standard' cycles and been happy with the results. but gh seems to be becoming more prevalent and readily available so i thought i would put it to you guys here for your opinions.

gh is like the icing on the cake. steroids are the actual cake. the foundation so to speak.

[CrankinSteiN]

Correct!!!

I have been able to keep most of it.

did you just agree with me?? Is this the twilight zone?? lol

[Flexem]

thanks - i was really just looking for general opinions here more than anything. i personally have never tried it and have stuck with 'standard' cycles and been happy with the results. but gh seems to be becoming more prevalent and readily available so i thought i would put it to you guys here for your opinions.

[bigscott]

for pure size and body transformation untill the get they gene manipulation thing perfected - test will always be best -

growth is way over rated

[redback]

Who told you that? You ever try Igf?

yes im using it right now very low dose 60mcgs post workout.

[CrankinSteiN]

you can keep a good amount of your gains when coming off whether it be steroids or hormones if you do it properly....

[redback]

As most do/\

sure, with steroids. Not with stuff like igf and cjc 1295,

[Bouncer]

if you are picking one or the other, its steroids. dont listen to these dickweeds.

[ROCKETW19]

I wasn't assuming that at all.... steroids are just more efficient in my opinion then GH whether you are cutting or bulking....

I do however agree that if we are going to compare specifics then we need more info but I also still think comparing those two is comparing apples to oranges...

I agree 100% But more like apples to carrots.lol

[ROCKETW19]

You wouldnt use Gh alone anyway, you would be wasting your time without running aas.

Not true! GH would work better with gear true.. but still works with out it.

[redback]

You wouldnt use Gh alone anyway, you would be wasting your time without running aas.

[redback]

But he also had very good genetics that most don't have.

Plus he also lost everything after his cycle. Noone had mentioned any other peptides. IGF-1 is more potent than Gh and works alot faster. The gains are also alot harder to lose.

[CrankinSteiN]

You guys are ASSuming he wants to get big! What if he is just wanting fat loss, health, or he is 50 yrs old. To many un-anwsered questions to say one is better. We need to at the very last hear what his goals are.

But I do agree in a general term test would be best.

I wasn't assuming that at all.... steroids are just more efficient in my opinion then GH whether you are cutting or bulking....

I do however agree that if we are going to compare specifics then we need more info but I also still think comparing those two is comparing apples to oranges...