Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Arimidex boosts test

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arimidex boosts test

    Study Shows That Arimidex Boosts Testosterone



    Estrogen suppression in males: metabolic effects.
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jul;85(7):2370-7 (ISSN: 0021-972X)
    Mauras N; O'Brien KO; Klein KO; Hayes V [email protected].

    We have shown that testosterone (T) deficiency per se is associated with
    marked catabolic effects on protein, calcium metabolism, and body
    composition in men independent of changes in GH or insulin-like growth
    factor I production. It is not clear,,however, whether estrogens have a
    major role in whole body anabolism in males. We investigated the metabolic
    effects of selective estrogen suppression in the male using a potent
    aromatase inhibitor, Arimidex (Anastrozole). First, a dose-response study of
    12 males (mean age, 16.1 +/- 0.3 yr) was conducted, and blood withdrawn at
    baseline and after 10 days of oral Arimidex given as two different doses
    (either 0.5 or 1 mg) in random order with a 14-day washout in between. A
    sensitive estradiol (E2) assay showed an approximately 50% decrease in E2
    concentrations with either of the two doses; hence, a 1-mg dose was selected
    for other studies. Subsequently, eight males (aged 15-22 yr; four adults and
    four late pubertal) had isotopic infusions of [(13)C]leucine and
    (42)Ca/(44)Ca, indirect calorimetry, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry,
    isokinetic dynamometry, and growth factors measurements performed
    before and after 10 weeks of daily doses of Arimidex. Contrary to the effects of T
    withdrawal, there were no significant changes in body composition (body mass
    index, fat mass, and fat-free mass) after estrogen suppression or in rates
    of protein synthesis or degradation; carbohydrate, lipid, or protein
    oxidation; muscle strength; calcium kinetics; or bone growth factors
    concentrations. However, E2 concentrations decreased 48% (P = 0.006), with
    no significant change in mean and peak GH concentrations, but with an 18%
    decrease in plasma insulin-like growth factor I concentrations. There was a
    58% increase in serum T (P = 0.0001), sex hormone-binding globulin did not
    change, whereas LH and FSH concentrations increased (P < 0.02, both). Serum
    bone markers, osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations, and
    rates of bone calcium deposition and resorption did not change. In
    conclusion, these data suggest that in the male 1) estrogens do not
    contribute significantly to the changes in body composition and protein
    synthesis observed with changing androgen levels; 2) estrogen is a main
    regulator of the gonadal-pituitary feedback for the gonadotropin axis; and
    3) this level of aromatase inhibition does not negatively impact either
    kinetically measured rates of bone calcium turnover or indirect markers of
    bone calcium turnover, at least in the short term. Further studies will
    provide valuable information on whether timed aromatase inhibition can be
    useful in increasing the height potential of pubertal boys with profound
    growth retardation without the confounding negative effects of gonadal
    androgen suppression.
Working...
X