EQ Question

[Johnny Bravo]

Hey, how much do you guys like to run in a cycle? I will be running EQ with test in a couple weeks and was planning on 300ml of the EQ.

Just thought I would ask what other people are running the EQ at.

[blingin]

How much test, how many cycles have u done, and for how long? but 300 shuld be good if its ur first or 2nd cycle

[hitmansb]

I've had decent results running 300mg EQ per week.

I will admit that I got better results running my EQ higher on my last cycle (600mg/week the first three weeks, then 400mg/week thereafter).

Even if you decide to stick with 300mg/week, definately consider the merit of doing a front-load with higher doses for the first two or three weeks...it definately makes a difference.

[wheyman]

I had good results running it at 400mgs a week. EQ is best ran for at least 12 weeks so keep that in mind.

[Skyefire]

what they said, EQ is comparitively weak compare to test so the dosages should be a little higher, 400 is where I always tell people to start. both wheyman and hitmansb are right about the time and front loading it.

[Johnny Bravo]

I planned on running 300 but will most likely do the front loading that you guys suggested. That is what I have heard in the past and wanted to be sure before trying the EQ for the first time. I have run deca now in 2 cycles and am jacked to try EQ.

[Skyefire]

Originally posted by Johnny Bravo
I planned on running 300 but will most likely do the front loading that you guys suggested. That is what I have heard in the past and wanted to be sure before trying the EQ for the first time. I have run deca now in 2 cycles and am jacked to try EQ.

I like EQ but remember that it is not a mass drug. I am not sure why people compare it to deca as it is nothing like it really

[house1]

imo eq should not be run at a dose lower then 400mgs - then again i think eq is overrated and a waste

thats just my opinon though

[iceberg]

Run test with it.
Someone will correct me if I am wrong but I allways was told 2:1 test:EQ same ratio as Test:deca.
So if you run 300 mg/wk EQ, you should take 600mg/wk test

ICEout
ICEberg

[Skyefire]

Originally posted by iceberg
Run test with it.
Someone will correct me if I am wrong but I allways was told 2:1 test:EQ same ratio as Test:deca.
So if you run 300 mg/wk EQ, you should take 600mg/wk test

ICEout
ICEberg

not necessary at all. you can run EQ alone if you want with no problems (not much in the way of gains but low on the sides) . and EQ is nowhere near as strong as deca, and the ratio is really a matter of prefrance. Just as a rule of thumb I use a 3:2 ratio rather then a 2:1 but there is no real reason other then to keep the test dosage down while having a effective dosage on the other.

[iceberg]

Originally posted by Skyefire
not necessary at all. you can run EQ alone if you want with no problems (not much in the way of gains but low on the sides) . and EQ is nowhere near as strong as deca, and the ratio is really a matter of prefrance. Just as a rule of thumb I use a 3:2 ratio rather then a 2:1 but there is no real reason other then to keep the test dosage down while having a effective dosage on the other.

I was not 100% sure, I was just parroting what I have read on boards over last couple of years.

Thanks for your input.

ICEout
IcEberg