Seeing Dbol is a oral steriod. How is it converted into a liquid form? Is the same processed used as converting Finiplex to Tren? Or is there a totally different chemical structure for Liquid Dbol then Oral Dbol? Thanks
Announcement
Collapse
Liquid Dbol
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by spideyDude, dbol IS a 17-alkylated steroid.
I understand this about Oral but I am not familiar at all with liquid dBol.
I read this statement on another site which peaked my interest.
"there is no need to worry about it being hepi-toxic because it's not c17 alpha alkylated like oral D-bol... "(referring to liquid form)
It made me think that Dbol is a c17 but maybe because the liquid doesn't have the binders it is no longer toxic.
I understand 17-alpha alkylated are very liver-toxic. I know that they are in the oral form because the binders that are in the pill. If you dont make them into a pill they wouldn't be toxic because no binders are necessary.
Comment
-
dbol no matter if its pill or liquid is 17-aa.Originally posted by rhinotat2I understand this about Oral but I am not familiar at all with liquid dBol.
I read this statement on another site which peaked my interest.
"there is no need to worry about it being hepi-toxic because it's not c17 alpha alkylated like oral D-bol... "(referring to liquid form)
It made me think that Dbol is a c17 but maybe because the liquid doesn't have the binders it is no longer toxic.
I understand 17-alpha alkylated are very liver-toxic. I know that they are in the oral form because the binders that are in the pill. If you dont make them into a pill they wouldn't be toxic because no binders are necessary.
Comment
-
That makes me think what they are selling is not dbol at all but rather something else (a prohormone maybe) with a different structure. Dianabol is the common name for methandrostenolone, a 17-alphamethylated version of boldenone.Originally posted by rhinotat2I understand this about Oral but I am not familiar at all with liquid dBol.
I read this statement on another site which peaked my interest.
"there is no need to worry about it being hepi-toxic because it's not c17 alpha alkylated like oral D-bol... "(referring to liquid form)
It made me think that Dbol is a c17 but maybe because the liquid doesn't have the binders it is no longer toxic.
I understand 17-alpha alkylated are very liver-toxic. I know that they are in the oral form because the binders that are in the pill. If you dont make them into a pill they wouldn't be toxic because no binders are necessary.
There is no advantage in injecting it and there are some disadvantages (namely, infection). It is cleared by the liver whether you take it orally or inject it so the effect on the liver is the same.
Just swallow the damn dbol like everyone else and stop worrying about it.
Comment
-
Just swallow the damn dbol like everyone else and stop worrying about it.
I dont use Dbol I was just trying to understand the difference. I am a test & HGH guy.
If I was to hit the orals Id do Halo's first, Pimobolan 50's or AD 50's.
Dbol wouldn't my choice.
I think you're missing my point. yes everything is cleared by the liver but obviously orals are more toxic to your liver because the binders in the pills. I was trying to find out if the liquid contained those binders. Thanks for your help.
Comment
-
Orals are not more toxic because of the binders in the pills. The binders are typically just starch or methyl cellulose and are totally inert, nontoxic things.
Orals are liver toxic because they are all 17-AAS (with the exceptions of proviron and oral primo). They are inherently liver toxic as a result of their chemical structure. There is no other reason. The 17-alkylation ehances the bioavailability but nothing is free. The price is that it also enhances liver toxicity.
The liquid dbol made from dissolving methandrostenolone powder in some solvent (ethanol) is just as liver toxic as the pills. Indeed, one could argue it is even a little worse since ethanol is also liver toxic.
Comment
-
Halo's? What for? I think the disadvantages outweigh the benefits on that one.Originally posted by rhinotat2Just swallow the damn dbol like everyone else and stop worrying about it.
I dont use Dbol I was just trying to understand the difference. I am a test & HGH guy.
If I was to hit the orals Id do Halo's first, Pimobolan 50's or AD 50's.
Dbol wouldn't my choice.
I think you're missing my point. yes everything is cleared by the liver but obviously orals are more toxic to your liver because the binders in the pills. I was trying to find out if the liquid contained those binders. Thanks for your help.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=spidey]Orals are not more toxic because of the binders in the pills. The binders are typically just starch or methyl cellulose and are totally inert, nontoxic things.
Orals are liver toxic because they are all 17-AAS (with the exceptions of proviron and oral primo). They are inherently liver toxic as a result of their chemical structure. There is no other reason. The 17-alkylation ehances the bioavailability but nothing is free. The price is that it also enhances liver toxicity.
I read a study some time ago that stated that the binders in AS are what caused the Toxicity or at least contribute to it. If I can locate it I'll present it. Thanks for the information.
Comment
-
Yes, please do because that makes no sense whatsoever. Why would someone use a toxic binder when they could use simple starch and it works just as well. Plus, from an economical standpoint, starch is dirt cheap and hypoallergenic. Companies looking to their bottom lines love starch as a binder.
Comment

Comment