Originally posted by OhHannah
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
OK, what was she on? (Marion Jones)
Collapse
X
-
yep.Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Postexactly balco trade mark cycle!
these altheletes have to learn how to be discrete about it ... inject themselves, no witnesses, no trainers, no recites or paper trail. dam seems obvious to me??????
her records are impressive and should not be erased .... they came from her hard work and dedicatoin... its not just a magic pill the media wants everyone to believe it is. like anyone could do it. gime me a breakLast edited by NYCmitch25; 01-13-08, 08:00 AM.
Comment
-
i am sure that faggot YJ will be along to tell you that "IT WAS ALL DRUGS." lolOriginally posted by NYCmitch25 View Postyep.
these altheletes have to learn how to be discrete about it ... inject themselves, no witnesses, no trainers, no recites or paper trail. dam seems obvious to me??????
her records are impressive and should not be erased .... they came from her hard work and dedicatoin... its not just a magic pill the media wants everyone to believe it is. like anyone could do it. gime me a break
Comment
-
I doubt any athlete who was drug-free and had a bunch of silver medals to show for it against Marion's golds would be inclined to agree with you. What happened to the notion of fair play?Originally posted by NYCmitch25 View Posther records are impressive and should not be erased .... they came from her hard work and dedicatoin... its not just a magic pill the media wants everyone to believe it is. like anyone could do it. gime me a break
Comment
-
I think its funny you think this exsists... way to eat up the media bs.Originally posted by Scrumhalf View PostI doubt any athlete who was drug-free and had a bunch of silver medalsLast edited by NYCmitch25; 01-13-08, 12:36 PM.
Comment
-
I don't think there are any drug-free athletes winning silver at the olympics. Just athletes who had doctors smart enough to design a drug regimen to beat testing.Originally posted by Scrumhalf View PostI doubt any athlete who was drug-free and had a bunch of silver medals to show for it against Marion's golds would be inclined to agree with you. What happened to the notion of fair play?
Comment
-
the clear can be had but it wont realy be the clear. all they took was tren=THG with GH and test. you also must remember they had full blown blood work up and Mr conti knew exactly what your body needed to work its best. They had it down to the littlest things and gave you what you needed. say you were missing 1.3mgs of zinc he knew and gave it to you in the exact dose.Originally posted by OhHannah View PostIs "The Clear" even gettable by the average person without top-level Balco connections? Me likey those results!
Comment
-
Fair enough, but the notion that her records were legitimate and should not be erased is laughable. She broke the rules and got caught and must face the consequences.Originally posted by hitmansb View PostI don't think there are any drug-free athletes winning silver at the olympics. Just athletes who had doctors smart enough to design a drug regimen to beat testing.
Comment
-
With all due respect, I think you are underestimating my intelligence here.Originally posted by NYCmitch25 View PostI think its funny you think this exsists... way to eat up the media bs.
My point about the silver medalist is not to be taken literally but rather to make a point. Maybe you assert that nobody who makes it to the Olympics is drug free. Fine. However, at some point or some level, there is a drug-free athlete who is cheated by a drug-taking athlete simply because the former is playing by the rules and the latter is not. It's as simple as that.
Note that I'm not passing judgment on the rules. But for better or worse, the rules are what they are and athletes who compete in the Olympics and IAAF-sanctioned competitions must abide by them.
I don't like to pay taxes either but I am not about to commit tax fraud because of that. I'd approach the problem by voting for a candidate whose vision of taxation matches mine. If athletes don't like the rules, they should work on changing them, or coming up with test-free competitions (like bodybuilding).
My point is that my sympathies are with the drug-free athletes, whatever level they may be at. I don't like cheaters regardless of the enterprise they are engaged in. And if they are caught, I am not going to lose any sleep if they get the book thrown at them.
Now, I realize that not too many people on this board will, for obvious reasons, agree with the current rules relating to drugs in athletics. However, surely more people than I would recognize the obvious hypocrisy instead of just insinuating "media BS" and somehow making athletes like Marion Jones to be heroes or martyrs.
Comment
-
i brought this up with YJ but i think i should bring it up here to. scrum, please define cheating for me. are the athletes that are running a special cocktail of supplements designed by nutrition/supplement gurus cheating? those people would have an advantage over those who aren't on those supplements. how about the athletes that have their own nutritionist? are they cheating over athletes who don't have one? how about athletes that have higher natural test or gh levels? they have an advantage, are they cheating? nothing is ever fair and nothing is ever equal. where do you draw the line on what is and isnt cheating.Originally posted by Scrumhalf View PostWith all due respect, I think you are underestimating my intelligence here.
My point about the silver medalist is not to be taken literally but rather to make a point. Maybe you assert that nobody who makes it to the Olympics is drug free. Fine. However, at some point or some level, there is a drug-free athlete who is cheated by a drug-taking athlete simply because the former is playing by the rules and the latter is not. It's as simple as that.
Note that I'm not passing judgment on the rules. But for better or worse, the rules are what they are and athletes who compete in the Olympics and IAAF-sanctioned competitions must abide by them.
I don't like to pay taxes either but I am not about to commit tax fraud because of that. I'd approach the problem by voting for a candidate whose vision of taxation matches mine. If athletes don't like the rules, they should work on changing them, or coming up with test-free competitions (like bodybuilding).
My point is that my sympathies are with the drug-free athletes, whatever level they may be at. I don't like cheaters regardless of the enterprise they are engaged in. And if they are caught, I am not going to lose any sleep if they get the book thrown at them.
Now, I realize that not too many people on this board will, for obvious reasons, agree with the current rules relating to drugs in athletics. However, surely more people than I would recognize the obvious hypocrisy instead of just insinuating "media BS" and somehow making athletes like Marion Jones to be heroes or martyrs.
Comment
-
so whats your point? lol.Originally posted by radoTrue...But we all understand that taking AS for the purpose of sports, is an advantage...In every sport there's is cheating...Nascar, Golf, Basketball, etc...Even in politics there's cheating...
Comment
-
your not answering my question. your giving me the definition of the word cheating and then throwing in obvious crap. when i say, "define cheating" i don't mean the definition from Websters you idiot. i am talking about what we as people see as cheating and the hypocrisy of the media and the public.
Comment
-
so you dont think there is any media hype and BS involving steroids? you dont see the irony of someone calling someone else a cheater or putting them down as they go smoke a cigarette or pop a pill to escape from stress?
why is having a nutrition/supplement guru, cocktails of supplements, naturally higher test and GH levels over someone who dosen't have those things not seen as an advantage and steroids is?
you see my point rado, i am not trying to argue with you, just trying to make people see the irony and BS with all of this.
Comment

Comment