steroids vs gh

[Flexem]

pros? cons? opinions?

[wnabeabeast]

Two very different drugs, if I had choose one I would do a cycle of AAS before I do GH plus AAS are whole lot cheaper and faster results, do a little search on this site and you'll find about a thousand threads that would answer your questions.

[Mr I]

what he said

[Bouncer]

i like to think of it this way.

Arnold never used nor needed GH. all he needed was steroids.

[ROCKETW19]

Like beast said two different things. There would be a bunch of questions needing to be anwsered before I could even point you in the right direction.

[CrankinSteiN]

thats comparing apples to oranges.... Not possible...

Now if you only have the money for one or the other then I can tell you your money is better spent on test then GH...

[Bouncer]

i really dont think its that hard to answer.

in terms of transforming your body... diet, steroids, cardio is all thats needed. GH is something extra that isnt needed.

[ROCKETW19]

You guys are ASSuming he wants to get big! What if he is just wanting fat loss, health, or he is 50 yrs old. To many un-anwsered questions to say one is better. We need to at the very last hear what his goals are.

But I do agree in a general term test would be best.

[wnabeabeast]

You guys are ASSuming he wants to get big! What if he is just wanting fat loss, health, or he is 50 yrs old. To many un-anwsered questions to say one is better. We need to at the very last hear what his goals are.

But I do agree in a general term test would be best.

I think he just wanted to get our general opinion.

[CrankinSteiN]

You guys are ASSuming he wants to get big! What if he is just wanting fat loss, health, or he is 50 yrs old. To many un-anwsered questions to say one is better. We need to at the very last hear what his goals are.

But I do agree in a general term test would be best.

I wasn't assuming that at all.... steroids are just more efficient in my opinion then GH whether you are cutting or bulking....

I do however agree that if we are going to compare specifics then we need more info but I also still think comparing those two is comparing apples to oranges...

[redback]

But he also had very good genetics that most don't have.

Plus he also lost everything after his cycle. Noone had mentioned any other peptides. IGF-1 is more potent than Gh and works alot faster. The gains are also alot harder to lose.

[redback]

You wouldnt use Gh alone anyway, you would be wasting your time without running aas.

[ROCKETW19]

You wouldnt use Gh alone anyway, you would be wasting your time without running aas.

Not true! GH would work better with gear true.. but still works with out it.

[ROCKETW19]

I wasn't assuming that at all.... steroids are just more efficient in my opinion then GH whether you are cutting or bulking....

I do however agree that if we are going to compare specifics then we need more info but I also still think comparing those two is comparing apples to oranges...

I agree 100% But more like apples to carrots.lol

[Bouncer]

if you are picking one or the other, its steroids. dont listen to these dickweeds.