In the past i have homebrewed Test E 400 mg per ml and EQ 400 mg per ml.Does anyone know if 300 would be better for some reason or will 400 be fine.I cant recall having a problem with 400 on these two and they dont crash at all! Why do manufacturers only make theirs 200 most of the time. I do get a little bit of a bump that last for several days after dosing but have never had any kind of abcess!!!
Announcement
Collapse
300 mg per ml or 400mg
Collapse
X
-
If you can make high dose,,pain free,,,then by all means,,,but from experience somethings are best lower.Originally posted by crossconnect View PostIn the past i have homebrewed Test E 400 mg per ml and EQ 400 mg per ml.Does anyone know if 300 would be better for some reason or will 400 be fine.I cant recall having a problem with 400 on these two and they dont crash at all! Why do manufacturers only make theirs 200 most of the time. I do get a little bit of a bump that last for several days after dosing but have never had any kind of abcess!!!
Comment
-
Agreed, I would think these are the only two compounds that would be suitable for that high a concentration. Shorter acting compounds have to be much lower because they are not as oil soluble. These two compounds have always held perfectly in the solution and i am just wondering why you dont see this high a dosage with pharm companies.
Comment
-
if the higher concentrations arent painful for you then make it, but there has to be a saturation point at which 1 ml can only suspend x amount of steroid so juss as long you stay lower than that it would be fine...and drug companies make 200 mg/ml because thru their research 200 mg/ml would be optimal for least amount of pain and easily allows titrations because at higher concentrations each ml is worth that much more
Comment

Comment