Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

testosterone levels and prostate cancer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • testosterone levels and prostate cancer

    posted by jb on CEM


    testosterone levels and prostate cancer

    and here we go again, now it seems that higher levels of testosterone are not necessarily bad for men. htis should be a relief for those on trt.

    jb

    ==========================
    ScientificWorldJournal. 2009 Jul 27;9:685-90. Links
    Rapidly shifting concepts regarding androgens and prostate cancer.Morgentaler A.
    There has been a recent dramatic shift in our understanding of the relationship between androgens and prostate cancer (PCa). Whereas for several decades it had been assumed that higher serum testosterone (T) concentrations would lead to ever-greater PCa growth, current literature indicates that PCa growth is unaffected by changes in serum T throughout most of the naturally occurring range. A Saturation Model has been proposed to explain how prostate tissue can be exquisitely sensitive to changes in serum T at the very low end of the concentration range, but appears indifferent to such changes above the near-castrate range. This has special applicability to T-deficient men, since this means that T therapy may not be nearly as risky as once assumed. Indeed, one of the more interesting changes over the last several years has been the growing acceptance of the use of T therapy in men with a prior history of PCa, with early data indicating minimal risk of cancer recurrence or progression. Provocative new evidence suggests that it is not high serum T that is problematic for PCa, but low serum T that is associated with worrisome cancer features and outcomes, such as high Gleason score, advanced stage of presentation, and increased risk of biochemical recurrence after surgery. It will be interesting to see what changes will occur in this rapidly changing field over the next several years.

  • #2
    Interesting, my father actually is thinking about doing some type of hormone replacement therapy, his test levels are pretty shot (in 60s) but he is in phenomal condition.. most people think he might be 50. He has been talking it over w/the doctor and they have been mostly looking into his free test levels those are apparently the lowest, I believe he is going to start w/basic b12 injections (dunno where he got that idea *ahem*) and see how he feels. Their isn't any cancer in the last 3 generations of my family on both sides which is almost surreal when you consider how many people it affects so this is just more good news if he decides to opt for the treatment, thx for the post.

    Comment


    • #3
      The free test level is the only level that matters. I have no idea why his doctor would suggest B12 for low free test. B12 is used for anemia patients.

      Comment


      • #4
        he is getting lethargic and so it came up, but like I said he is doing more research into the hormonal end, I just want him to be happy and healthy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by liftsiron View Post
          posted by jb on CEM


          testosterone levels and prostate cancer

          and here we go again, now it seems that higher levels of testosterone are not necessarily bad for men. htis should be a relief for those on trt.

          jb

          ==========================
          ScientificWorldJournal. 2009 Jul 27;9:685-90. Links
          Rapidly shifting concepts regarding androgens and prostate cancer.Morgentaler A.
          There has been a recent dramatic shift in our understanding of the relationship between androgens and prostate cancer (PCa). Whereas for several decades it had been assumed that higher serum testosterone (T) concentrations would lead to ever-greater PCa growth, current literature indicates that PCa growth is unaffected by changes in serum T throughout most of the naturally occurring range. A Saturation Model has been proposed to explain how prostate tissue can be exquisitely sensitive to changes in serum T at the very low end of the concentration range, but appears indifferent to such changes above the near-castrate range. This has special applicability to T-deficient men, since this means that T therapy may not be nearly as risky as once assumed. Indeed, one of the more interesting changes over the last several years has been the growing acceptance of the use of T therapy in men with a prior history of PCa, with early data indicating minimal risk of cancer recurrence or progression. Provocative new evidence suggests that it is not high serum T that is problematic for PCa, but low serum T that is associated with worrisome cancer features and outcomes, such as high Gleason score, advanced stage of presentation, and increased risk of biochemical recurrence after surgery. It will be interesting to see what changes will occur in this rapidly changing field over the next several years.
          you know what gets me lifts -- its the knee jerk reaction to test in general without fully understanding its real pros and cons !! its nice to see some more reserch being done on t therapy -- i do believe it has great benefits as you get older -

          whenever you see anything on test or gear in general its always about sports and the benefits are always cast away because its the negatives that sell - i know kinda off the subject but small rant i had to get out there

          Comment


          • #6
            It will change in 3 months so no worriies!!!!!!!lol

            Always good to get the latest though!!!!

            gator

            Comment

            Working...
            X