Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

SARMS s4 + GH - thoughts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mr I
    replied
    So both are ordered, picking the gh up this week and just waiting for RUI to do their thing, I'm thinking 4ius gh and 36mg Sarms s4 so we'll see. I'll be slaming the clomid also at the same time as pct

    Leave a comment:


  • jack tors
    replied
    i got nothing out of SARMS just great stamina in the gym. no strength gains not sure why only a 5 week run. kinda pricey. i used it as a bridge between cycles during PCT. i will try it again b4 I give up on it. the vision wasnt an issue for me. ppl scared me with the loss of night vision but it wasnt the issue. I dont think its night vision is the problem. I noticed it took much longer to adjust to light and dark not blurry vision or night vision. the problem is sensitivity to light and dark. i walked in on a bright sunny day to the office it took a good min or 2 for my eyes to adjust. i couldnt see well at all until they adjusted and i was fine. i drove at night and it wasnt an issue the headlights werent a problem. sides were minimal. i did feel a little weird on it. Im going to wait till i tried it again to comment.
    Last edited by jack tors; 07-18-10, 07:37 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Post
    Ya depends where you get the IGF from. Lets say all IGF is not created equal and IGF by its self is not close to IGF with GH.

    I will be intrested to see how you like the SARMs I wanted it for my title fight but the lights and blury eyes just wont work,lol.
    supposed to be undetectable but yeah I heard about the night vision thing, I wonder if its dose dependent

    Leave a comment:


  • ROCKETW19
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr incredible View Post
    Never got much outa gh without aas before, and igf never did much either, gh plus aas however worked great so the sarm should just kinda replace the aas
    Ya depends where you get the IGF from. Lets say all IGF is not created equal and IGF by its self is not close to IGF with GH.

    I will be intrested to see how you like the SARMs I wanted it for my title fight but the lights and blury eyes just wont work,lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Post
    Ya AOW loves SARMs anything with GH is good,lol. I personaly like IGF and GH
    Never got much outa gh without aas before, and igf never did much either, gh plus aas however worked great so the sarm should just kinda replace the aas

    Leave a comment:


  • ROCKETW19
    replied
    Ya AOW loves SARMs anything with GH is good,lol. I personaly like IGF and GH

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Correction to my earlier point it would seem that at 50mcg and above it can be suppressive but at levels needed to achieve physiological benefits (36mcg per day for a 200lb guy) its not suppressive. I'll try it

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    sounds like an interesting concept. i guess the only way to see how it works is by trial.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    started a topic SARMS s4 + GH - thoughts?

    SARMS s4 + GH - thoughts?

    So the word on the boards seems to suggest that at 50 ed SARMS s4 doesn't inhibit. Accordingly I'm wondering about using it as the androgenic component to synergise with GH a bit like test does. If it works you have a stack that would give you anabolic effects akin to a light cycle and no inhibition?
Working...
X