GHRP-6 Log and Info thread.

[Bouncer]

This question may be helpful for people looking to use GHRP so I'll ask here. I ordered GHRP-6 from Lion/RUI and I also ordered 30 ml bacteriostatic water. My shipment arrives and along with it come the empty bottles for reconstitution and also bottles of 0.9% sodium chloride.... Now I'm assuming youre supposed to use this to reconstitute the GHRP, or does it matter which of the two you use?

pretty sure 0.9% sodium chloride is interchangeable with BAC water.

i think the difference is BAC water has a preservative in it so the GHRP will last longer after reconstitution.

BUT, the sodium chloride will be fine to use because you will be using the GHRP well before it would go bad.

[ROCKILLER]

This question may be helpful for people looking to use GHRP so I'll ask here. I ordered GHRP-6 from Lion/RUI and I also ordered 30 ml bacteriostatic water. My shipment arrives and along with it come the empty bottles for reconstitution and also bottles of 0.9% sodium chloride.... Now I'm assuming youre supposed to use this to reconstitute the GHRP, or does it matter which of the two you use?

[Gods Son]

i know datbtru. not personaly

[Konitz]

I dont know where your reading because people are talking about both. The leading "bro science" on the subject is a researcher by the screen name datbtru. All the facts at the beginning of this thread are word for word from him.

Just random boards; I have read though that -2 has the power and does not desensitize on lower doses. And it seems that for you anyways 200mcg did the trick so it wouldn't be a problem.

[Bouncer]

I don't have either; I was just reiterating what I heard on the interwebz; everyone is talking about -6 but rarely -2. Here I notice -2 seems like the winning ticket, I just wanted to see if other people noticed a majority bias towards one or the other.

I dont know where your reading because people are talking about both. The leading "bro science" on the subject is a researcher by the screen name datbtru. All the facts at the beginning of this thread are word for word from him.

[Konitz]

Pretty sure you misunderstood. Lol. Everyone is pretty unanimous at 2 being slightly more effective.

And no 2 does not desensitize at all.

Sounds like you got yourself some 6 and now your trying to make yourself feel good by making up a few facts. Lol.

I don't have either; I was just reiterating what I heard on the interwebz; everyone is talking about -6 but rarely -2. Here I notice -2 seems like the winning ticket, I just wanted to see if other people noticed a majority bias towards one or the other.

[Bouncer]

Anyone that has used both will tell you the punch from 2 is stronger. Dont take my word for it, try it yourself.

[Gods Son]

Strange; everywhere I read people are making -6 stronger; I imagine the only way to accurately test it is to run both for 3-4 months and make a personal decision. I read some bro-science that said your body desensitizes to -2 as supposed to -6 which can be run indefinitely; again just talk on the web no definitive study to support the claims.

Im very happy with 6, but i bought it because of budget, i will try 2 later. Bouncer is a respected guy in this community, hes not calling 2 better for his own benifit

[Bouncer]

Strange; everywhere I read people are making -6 stronger; I imagine the only way to accurately test it is to run both for 3-4 months and make a personal decision. I read some bro-science that said your body desensitizes to -2 as supposed to -6 which can be run indefinitely; again just talk on the web no definitive study to support the claims.

Pretty sure you misunderstood. Lol. Everyone is pretty unanimous at 2 being slightly more effective.

And no 2 does not desensatize at all.

Sounds like you got yourself some 6 and now your trying to make yourself feel good by making up a few facts. Lol.

[Konitz]

ghrp 2 is a bit stronger. IMO 100mcg of ghrp-2 = 150mcg of ghrp-6

Strange; everywhere I read people are making -6 stronger; I imagine the only way to accurately test it is to run both for 3-4 months and make a personal decision. I read some bro-science that said your body desensitizes to -2 as supposed to -6 which can be run indefinitely; again just talk on the web no definitive study to support the claims.

[Bouncer]

I have been doing some heavy research on this substance; I do not know if this is bro-science, but I read 300mcg daily of GHRP-6 releases 4.5 IU's of GH.

I also noticed that -2 is much more pricier than -6; one would think there is going to be larger result with the -2; any thought on this? Seems like we have a spread plying field with both.

ghrp 2 is a bit stronger. IMO 100mcg of ghrp-2 = 150mcg of ghrp-6

[Mr I]

One last question; they say this substance is very closely related to GHB if you have a regular drug-test for a job opening, is this stuff gonna raise any flags?

Its nothing like ghb, and ghb is like the methamphetamine of gh peptide family, don't tough that dirty shit.

[Mr I]

Its bro science, but id think about 3iu s would be more realistic from 3 x 100mcg shots spaced 4 hours apart

[Konitz]

I have been doing some heavy research on this substance; I do not know if this is bro-science, but I read 300mcg daily of GHRP-6 releases 4.5 IU's of GH.

I also noticed that -2 is much more pricier than -6; one would think there is going to be larger result with the -2; any thought on this? Seems like we have a spread plying field with both.

[Konitz]

no - testing for GHB is incredibly hard to do compared to standard drug tests. Unless they have a very sophisticated method of testing you will have no problems.

Thanks for the info