Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Progressive Cycles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Progressive Cycles

    This is something that I have been giving a lot of thought to lately. Its all based in theory. I am not saying that this is how it is but food for thought. Makes sense to me though.

    How often have you seen people mention that there best gains are made early in their cycles...such as the first 4-6 wks?

    In most 10 week cycles I don`t see this as a problem. Now as many people are gravitating towards cycles averaging 20 wks or sometimes more it becomes much more questionable.

    It seems that it becomes more important to force or trick to body into growth by playing with increasing dodes and changing up the AAS within the cycle.
    This is not a pyramid cycle....just stimulas ones muscles in order to extend growth beyond the for 4-6 wks that receptors are fresh.

    An example might be instead of the common cycle which is simple yet losing some affectiveness such as
    WK 1-20 Test 750 EW
    WK 1-20 EQ 600EW
    WK1-4 to 6 D-bol 50ED
    As your body becomes use to the doses your using--causing the tailing off of gains... maybe try a cycle which changes up dosages and drugs so as to "force" or trick your recptors into being like the first 4-6 wks though out.
    Examples might be like this.
    WK 1-10 Test-E 750 EW
    WK 1-10 Deca 400ew
    Wk 1-4 D-bol 50 ED
    Then onto
    WK 11-15 Test-e 1000 EW
    WK 11-15 Tren 100 EOD
    Wk 11-15 Drol 50 ED
    Lastly
    WK 16-20 Test-E 1250EW
    WK 16-22 Tren 100 ED
    WK 16-22 Winnie 50 ED

    Granted there are problems with some AAS`s being run too close to eachother and maybe you prefer Diff AAS`s.
    This is just hypothetical!

    My though is by bumping dosages and inserting diff AAS`s you should effectively be able to "trick" the body into continued growth such as in the first 4 wks or so. The body is keep off guard and recptors are seeing either diff steriods and/or diff dosages hopefully stimulating growth.
    This is much the same as changing your routine in lifting. In other words like changing reps and/or exercises to stimulate growth and staying out of a rut.
    I`ve seen longer and longer cycles lately(I like 20 wks myself) but many people follow the keep it simple idea which has its place. It seems to me in MHO that over 20+wks that the body would adapt to the AAS`s use and especially the dosages.

    This is just my thoughts and I have no real world proof that this is so. Logic says to me there may be some validation here.

    OK, Let me here your thoughts.

  • #2
    I have to say I agree with you logic. I have had a problem with gains after 10wks. I am planning my next cycle right now. I may implement your ideas into this next cycle.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think most people who run long cycles do exactly what you are speaking about. I know I do. I always either switch hormones or up dosages throughout a long cycle.

      It would be almost useless to run 750mg/wk Test for 20 weeks without changing esters or dosages.


      I don't agree with your timing. I think you could stay constant for the 1st 10 weeks then change dosages and hormones for the last 10 weeks and still see really good gains. Whereas, technically this would be more like doing 2 cycles than 1 long cycle.

      The key is to just experiment and see what works best for you. Everyone is different and what works great for me might not yield any gains for someone else.
      Last edited by MrE; 10-28-03, 07:04 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        bump for morning crew

        Comment


        • #5
          A last selfish bump for the evening crowd:)

          Comment

          Working...
          X