Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Short Sustanon Cycle Question...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Short Sustanon Cycle Question...

    Finally recovered after a 16 week test/primo cycle and dealing with the shutdown sucked. Def not gonna do another cycle that long again. Been thinking about experimenting with more frequent short 6 week cycles to minimize the sides and shutdown time etc. I know prop would be ideal, but I happen have a fair amount of Sustanon on hand already. If I was going to do a 6 week Sustanon cycle how would I get the most out of it? Should I frontload heavy in the beginning and then taper it down? Or should I just use prop for a short cycle like this?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Kdoggg View Post
    Finally recovered after a 16 week test/primo cycle and dealing with the shutdown sucked. Def not gonna do another cycle that long again. Been thinking about experimenting with more frequent short 6 week cycles to minimize the sides and shutdown time etc. I know prop would be ideal, but I happen have a fair amount of Sustanon on hand already. If I was going to do a 6 week Sustanon cycle how would I get the most out of it? Should I frontload heavy in the beginning and then taper it down? Or should I just use prop for a short cycle like this?
    ya better off selling it and getting prop.

    Comment


    • #3
      I hate sus kills my sex drive and doesnt work all that well.

      Comment


      • #4
        6 weeks of sust is a bad idea. will just be kicking in nicely around week 4 and then you will end it a short time later.

        basically shutting your natural test levels down for only 2 weeks of benefit.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Post
          6 weeks of sust is a bad idea. will just be kicking in nicely around week 4 and then you will end it a short time later.

          basically shutting your natural test levels down for only 2 weeks of benefit.
          Makes perfect sense - I'll just run some prop. Will probs do 6 weeks on 6 weeks off and then another 6 weeks on.

          If anyone has run short cycles like this in the past I'd be interested to hear your opinion of doing it this way.

          Comment


          • #6
            6 weeks on 6 weeks off still in not a very good idea. takes at least 6-7 weeks for your natural test levels to come back fully after a cycle.

            you will be all over the map hormone wise. body will be shutting down, coming back, shutting down etc..

            it really is not a healthy way to cycle.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Post
              6 weeks on 6 weeks off still in not a very good idea. takes at least 6-7 weeks for your natural test levels to come back fully after a cycle.

              you will be all over the map hormone wise. body will be shutting down, coming back, shutting down etc..

              it really is not a healthy way to cycle.
              So it is false thinking that a shorter cycle equates to a shorter recovery time? My thinking was that a 6 week cycle would only take maybe 2-3 weeks to recover from instead of 6-7 weeks.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kdoggg View Post
                So it is false thinking that a shorter cycle equates to a shorter recovery time? My thinking was that a 6 week cycle would only take maybe 2-3 weeks to recover from instead of 6-7 weeks.
                6-7weeks to recover is about normaly bro. I have no clue if short cycles help you recover faster though sorry. But I do agree with bouncer that if you cycle the way you posted your hormones will be all over the place and possably cause other sides.

                Comment


                • #9
                  short cycles isnt the way to go no matter what the goal.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X