Changing Ratios VS Switching Anabolic Steroid Compounds

[Bouncer]

Was thinking about which drug I should add to my test and deca cycle and it got me thinking.. do I really need to add in another drug?

Traditionally we run a cycle and come off or we switch to different steroid compounds to keep results going. This is where my idea comes in. How about instead of switching or adding in compounds we simply change the ratio of the drug we are using?

Example of 1000mg total compound per week to make things easy.

Lets say a guy is running 700mgs of test and 300mgs of deca per week. He does this for awhile until gains slow. At this point instead of adding something to the cycle what if you were to change it up to something like 500mgs of test and 500mgs of deca? You still have the same drugs, you still have the same total 1000mgs total dose but the ratio has changed significantly.

Has anyone ever tried something like this? I feel like it could help us get the most out of drugs without actually having to "up the dose" or add in more drugs.

[Bouncer]

Epix, this idea kinda came from our discussion on here this morning when I was asking about what to add to my test and deca cycle. Instead of having to add in a 3rd compound I feel like this idea may actually work. Thoughts? Totally retarded idea?

My thinking is that at the very least, we could absolutly max out a particular drug combo at a set dose better than we could if we simply kept the ratios exactly the same.

[rado]

I've done similar and didn't nice any difference. I went from doing a 600 mgs test and 300 tren, then I literally reversed the cycle...600 tren and 300 test..if that were the case, bro science would of beaten you to it sir


Try it, nothing to lose and everything to gain. .
Pun:D

[Bouncer]

you didnt notice a difference of going from 600mgs of test down to 300 and upping the tren by 300mgs? i find that hard to believe. that is a huge change in hormone levels. how long did you test this out?

[rado]

you didnt notice a difference of going from 600mgs of test down to 300 and upping the tren by 300mgs? i find that hard to believe. that is a huge change in hormone levels. how long did you test this out?

I didn't notice any huge or eye catching results, if that's what you want to know. The reason for me doing that was/is because for me, I'd rather have higher tren than test...I could run 200mg of test, which I am now, down from 300mgs and run 500, 600, 700 mgs of tren and I'd be ok.

What I dd notice is my strength getting even more stupid than it is, much stronger I got for sure....my cardio was not affected, tren does increase platelets and red blood cells which in return, cardio is affected.

But no gains or different look...hope that helps...I don't think it would matter. Try it out and log it

[epix00]

It's not a bad idea, but I'm also not sure it is a surefire solution as total AAS dosage plays a huge role. By keeping your total the same of two similarly powerful compounds all I could imagine happening is variations in the type of gains you make not neccesarily greater gains. This technique is used in contest prep cycles. So I do think you could bring out different levels of muscle properties like density, hardness, dryness at different ratios. However the overall anabolic or androgenic properties will remain reasonably close depending on how extreme the difference in ratios is. So if you had 400 of one and 600 of another the reverse would be similar, but if it was like 200 and 800 you switched it then a greater difference would be noted. I also could see this being effective with a weak compound and a stronger compound. For example if you were running low test high anavar and then went low anavar high test I could see a reasonable difference. But compounds somewhat similar strengths like test and deca I couldn't imagine too great of a difference unless you had one at an extremely low dose to begin with. I think there are def merits to your idea but the compounds and goal would have to be very specific to purpose. Make sense?

[rado]

Good post brother ! Hell I wouldn't do all that shit :D

[Bouncer]

I guess the obvious difference would be that you see the benefit of the particular drug you increase characteristics. For example if you bump up deca and lower test you can expect the joint/collagen benefit to increase.

[Mr I]

Given the plethora of different compounds available this is an abysmal idea, especially with those compounds

[Turbo3000]

You can go a long way down this pharmacokinetic road.

[Mr I]

You can go a long way down this pharmacokinetic road.

Indeed but imagine doing 800 mg deca and 200mg test.

Massive hemocrit increase and total cock block

[rado]

Indeed but imagine doing 800 mg deca and 200mg test.

Massive hemocrit increase and total cock block

:agreed:indeed

[chuckz28]

Indeed but imagine doing 800 mg deca and 200mg test.

Massive hemocrit increase and total cock block

Lee Priest claims to like high deca low test on more than one occasion.

[Mr I]

Lee Priest claims to like high deca low test on more than one occasion.

Lee priest only ever took low dozez though

[Bouncer]

Indeed but imagine doing 800 mg deca and 200mg test.

Massive hemocrit increase and total cock block

that would be extreme and beyond what I'm talking about. I'd never do that. my test dose would always be kept higher than deca.

but i do believe a benefit and difference could be seen if you went from like say 800mg test / 200mgs deca to 600mg test / 400mg deca and so on with any drug combo.