Tweet
is it the short half-life, absorbtion, what? there's not much talk about this being an effective steroid anywhere that i can find on here. just a few post that say it's "ineffective"... but why?
-
-
Its not that its ineffective, it is just costly and has to be taken in high doses daily. -
ahem. . .may I inject some speculation in here? I lived in Portugal for 3 years and in that time I took more than a couple bottles of andriol. . .it always gave me a wood like no other and was effective for bridging and I even had some good results stacking it with anavar. . .
Most guys get shitty results (IMHO) because they buy andriol from some dude that had it in his trunk for 4 months and it was inert. . .also getting it in the post etc. . .especially the old glass bottles that they used to come in made it a bad buy if you were not getting it right from the pharmacy. . .
keep safe
CGComment
-
funny thing: organon is really pushing this andriol 40 mg tabs. the ads in the medical journals are geared towards doctors treating what is being called andropause which is essentially low testosterone levels. the effective dose is being given as 200 mg per day so anywhere from 4-10 pills are recommended. it must be really cheap to produce thus high profit potential
one fellow has been prescribed this stuff. seems pretty expensive if you have to use 10 pills/day. i was told that it cost 80 per bottle. so one bottle may last 6 days or 2 weeks if taken at the minimum.
i remember reading an article about TU written for the old muscle media 2000 by the doctor who had aids. he wrote that it didn't do anything to bring up his testosterone levels and that he got no apprecialbe gains from it muscle wise.Comment
Comment