From what I learned, it's supposed to be about 5-9x of what you're injecting. I know that sounds like bro science, but that's how I determine if the gear is good to go. 300mg of properly dosed testosterone should yield 1500ngdl-2700ngdl. But I think we also have to take into consideration base-line levels.
I think 5-7x you have legit gear but when u hit 8-9x or more the gear might be a bit overdosed lol nothing wrong with that besides the fact that u don't know how much ur truly injecting. Also gives people the false sense that that's how good gear is and anything that is actually dosed correctly would feel weaker in comparison.
From what I learned, it's supposed to be about 5-9x of what you're injecting. I know that sounds like bro science, but that's how I determine if the gear is good to go. 300mg of properly dosed testosterone should yield 1500ngdl-2700ngdl. But I think we also have to take into consideration base-line levels.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2700 from 300mgs a week. that sounds off to me. doctors use 250mgs a week TRT to keep older guys at normal levels. 2700 is WAY higher than normal levels.
2700 from 300mgs a week. that sounds off to me. doctors use 250mgs a week TRT to keep older guys at normal levels. 2700 is WAY higher than normal levels.
TRT dosages are 100-250, 250mg rx is on the HIGH side. Again I'm sure it depends on how in the dirt your T levels are.
I would think the testosterone is converted into the estrogen. However I don't really have any scientific proof to back this claim up but it makes sense to me. This is what I learned from an old school vet on anothe forum. I'll see if I can find anything.
I would think the testosterone is converted into the estrogen. However I don't really have any scientific proof to back this claim up but it makes sense to me. This is what I learned from an old school vet on anothe forum. I'll see if I can find anything.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sure were talking like it was raw data, and it's not.
I was on 300mgs of script test and I was in the 1600's...you can't assume and make numbers based off yours.
I just came off another board sponsors AE test, go look at my numbers there and explain that one....go take a peak and let me know your rationale on that one
Comment