If Arnold had heart surgery in his 20's that purely genetic. Nothing to do with what your talking about.
what I'm talking about is health. genetic or steroid induced. duh. ur irrelevant. now go buy me a .40 sw and fetch me an ice cold fiji water. oh and while you're at it make me MOD of this board.
u really think Arnold is healthier than palumbo? Arnold had heart surgery in his 20s and was always known for heart issues.
I don't think I've heard of anything from Dave palumbo. not that there isn't. sure he looks like Count Dracula but u can't "judge a book by its cover" lol.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
If Arnold had heart surgery in his 20's that purely genetic. Nothing to do with what your talking about.
u really think Arnold is healthier than palumbo? Arnold had heart surgery in his 20s and was always known for heart issues.
I don't think I've heard of anything from Dave palumbo. not that there isn't. sure he looks like Count Dracula but u can't "judge a book by its cover" lol.
Other than the fact that Arnold was just in hospital I'd say overall he is healthier.
Dave abused the fuck out if AAS/slin/GH etc... Guys in Arnold's day didn't do dumb shit like that.
Between Palumbo and Arnold? Palumbo will probably be dead before he hits 65. He looks like walking death now.
And FYI Palumbo used 20 times as much AAS as Arnold ever did.
Think before trying to make a point. Lol
my question was who is healthier between the two not trying to make a point trying to ask a legitimate question
maybe u should think before jumping to conclusion assuming that I'm trying to make a point. not everything is an arguement u woman. u little woman. ur like a woman. u argue all the time. and the fact that you're still reading this smh. u tool.
the thing is though chadd, he right. GH is an expensive finishing touch. AAS is the meat and potatoes.
double your AAS dose and you'll see more gains then gh could ever have a chance of giving you and it will do it at 1/5th the cost.
and i dont buy the whole "you keep gh muscle forever" bs. look at dave palumbo. lol. that fucker took more gh in 1 week then all of us have in a year combined. he has literally no muscle on his body now. Arnold has more muscle at twice the age. lol
the thing is though chadd, he right. GH is an expensive finishing touch. AAS is the meat and potatoes.
double your AAS dose and you'll see more gains then gh could ever have a chance of giving you and it will do it at 1/5th the cost.
and i dont buy the whole "you keep gh muscle forever" bs. look at dave palumbo. lol. that fucker took more gh in 1 week then all of us have in a year combined. he has literally no muscle on his body now. Arnold has more muscle at twice the age. lol
Haha hgh muscle isn’t permanent, no way. Pros get small AF when they retire. I was my biggest before i ever touched HGH. AAS is king! But when you get older you can’t push the AAS as hard unfortunately. HGH speeds up recovery in between workouts for my old ass.
No it's just funny when Rado is comparing AAS and GH. He has no idea about GH. Fella takes entire kit at a time. lol
the thing is though chadd, he right. GH is an expensive finishing touch. AAS is the meat and potatoes.
double your AAS dose and you'll see more gains then gh could ever have a chance of giving you and it will do it at 1/5th the cost.
and i dont buy the whole "you keep gh muscle forever" bs. look at dave palumbo. lol. that fucker took more gh in 1 week then all of us have in a year combined. he has literally no muscle on his body now. Arnold has more muscle at twice the age. lol
Leave a comment: