Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

High IGF while having low GH

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • High IGF while having low GH

    I have an appointment here in a bit with a new doctor. My goal is to get my refill on script test and also getting a full check up; fertility is being discussed.

    These numbers here, were my last tren days. This is when I was doing year long tren cycles. Now since i haven't, igf has been consistently low.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • #2
    I've definitely heard that tren can have a stimulating effect on IGF levels. I'm not sure how factual that is though.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
      I've definitely heard that tren can have a stimulating effect on IGF levels. I'm not sure how factual that is though.
      Well to me it was quite significant, you've seen mine before. This is like 400 points higher.

      Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

      Comment


      • #4
        yea that's pretty significant. 400 point difference is high.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
          yea that's pretty significant. 400 point difference is high.
          I'll be running tren within the year or so for like 6 months. This will definitely debunk the myth.

          As many times that I've done labs in the past 1.5yrs(9 of them) one thing has been consistently shown; IGF levels super low and coincidence or not, while OFF tren.

          I have labs that go back to 2004 with high igf and I was on tren then; I mean when have I not been on tren lol.


          Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

          Comment


          • #6
            Curious why you had IGF-2 checked and not IGF-1? Looks like your IGF-2 results (564) are within normal levels (267-616). So it doesn’t look high.

            For IGF-1 the normal rage for you would be 75-216. Now if this number was 564 you wouldn’t definitely be very high.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
              Curious why you had IGF-2 checked and not IGF-1? Looks like your IGF-2 results (564) are within normal levels (267-616). So it doesn’t look high.

              For IGF-1 the normal rage for you would be 75-216. Now if this number was 564 you wouldn’t definitely be very high.
              I'll dig up the igf levels when they were also high. Doc requested the labs, not me.

              The point is that being on Tren, my igf levels were never low.

              Just digging up old stuff and found it interesting.

              This new doc I'm about to see, is definitely probably the best one I've had yet.

              I will be doing a long process check up.

              Full physical
              EKG
              EEG

              And a neurosonography....all this will begin this month and go for a good month. Once all that is set, I'll be back on and will play around with a few things.



              Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

              Comment


              • #8
                You said that your IGF was low post tren use. Have you had it tested recently and what was your score?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by rado View Post
                  Well to me it was quite significant, you've seen mine before. This is like 400 points higher.

                  Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
                  I think you’re getting confused and comparing your IGF-2 results to your IGF-1 results.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
                    You said that your IGF was low post tren use. Have you had it tested recently and what was your score?
                    Chadd...all of the labs that I've posted in the past year, is no tren and igf was low. Last labs was in may when I stopped everything and getting labs soon so I can see where I'm at.



                    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
                      I think you’re getting confused and comparing your IGF-2 results to your IGF-1 results.
                      Umm no...both have been high on numbers based off labs.

                      In other words I have had 400 and 500 points of igf and igf 2.



                      Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        You said it was 400 points higher than before. What results are you comparing?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
                          You said it was 400 points higher than before. What results are you comparing?
                          From the ones I've taken in the past year (low 100s)

                          Vs the ones I've taken many many years ago and in the 400s plus.



                          Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X