Originally posted by spidey
Heating is a poor way to insure sterility and covering with seran wrap will do NOTHING (except maybe melt the seran wrap) since the seran wrap itself is not sterile.
Heating is a poor way to insure sterility and covering with seran wrap will do NOTHING (except maybe melt the seran wrap) since the seran wrap itself is not sterile.
Originally posted by spidey
I doubt this would efficiently extract the tren ac. It has a rather poor solubility in oil. It is better to dissolve the tren in the BA and BB alone and then dilute with oil.
I doubt this would efficiently extract the tren ac. It has a rather poor solubility in oil. It is better to dissolve the tren in the BA and BB alone and then dilute with oil.
Originally posted by spidey
Again, heating is a poor way to insure sterility. Staph spores (for instance) can withstand the heat or even chemical agents like bleach. The tiny amount of BA in the mixture won't do jack against spores.
Again, heating is a poor way to insure sterility. Staph spores (for instance) can withstand the heat or even chemical agents like bleach. The tiny amount of BA in the mixture won't do jack against spores.
Originally posted by spidey
0.45 micron filter is not small enough to filter out spores. Filter with a 0.2 micron filter to insure complete sterility.
0.45 micron filter is not small enough to filter out spores. Filter with a 0.2 micron filter to insure complete sterility.
Originally posted by spidey
Not a good idea for two reasons: 1) As mentioned before, it doesn't sterilize effectively. 2) Tren is susceptable to air oxidation and heat will speed up that process. Heating will actually degrade some of the tren.
Not a good idea for two reasons: 1) As mentioned before, it doesn't sterilize effectively. 2) Tren is susceptable to air oxidation and heat will speed up that process. Heating will actually degrade some of the tren.
As for chemical reactivity and spontaneous oxidation, this is impossible without the presence of a multitude of catalysts: HX (acid), NBS, H3PO4, Pt, Mercury(II) acetate/THF, BH3, peroxide, osmium tetraoxide, etc. If one had any one of these reagents in their product then there is more to worry about than just spontaneous oxidation.
Hence, I hold that the triene system is very risilent with respect to structural integrity and spontaneous reactivity.
In addition, the acetone will have a better possibility of reacting with the triene system than it does spontaneously degrading...especially with added heat (as in the extraction step). Hence, the preferred solvent of MeOH. Granted MeOH is rather toxic if ingested but much larger quantities are required for negative sypmtom presentation than what may be left as residue after a properly dried sample.
Originally posted by spidey
Actually, you can be as "slobbish" as you like as long as you filter through a 0.2 micron filter at the end into a sterile vial. Of course, take care not to touch the needle before puncturing the rubber seal and swab the seal with alcohol.
Actually, you can be as "slobbish" as you like as long as you filter through a 0.2 micron filter at the end into a sterile vial. Of course, take care not to touch the needle before puncturing the rubber seal and swab the seal with alcohol.
Originally posted by spidey
BA is not miscible with water; only a 4% solution of BA in water can be prepared.
BA is not miscible with water; only a 4% solution of BA in water can be prepared.
As a quick estimate, let's assume a 7 liter blood volume. This will allow for roughly 280 mL's of BA to partition and another 280 mL's still in depot. That makes for over .5 liters of BA injected before it will stop partitioning due to satisfying the equilibium.
Realistically, the small amount of BA present in a typical homebrew will partition into the systemic circulation rather quickly as it will never reach that equilibrium.
My statement is still valid.
Chemo

Comment