Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Are tattoos for Beta Males?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are tattoos for Beta Males?

    Was flex subconsciously or consciously covering up his delts and arms with tattoos as he became less alpha? The important questions..




  • #2
    Since his tats are nothing more than big stupid tribal shit, that covers both entire arms and delts, i would def have to think he was in fact trying to hide what isnt there any more...prob thought they would help him keep some sort of "badass" appeal. It would be different if they actually had some type of meaning behind them-but those more than likey dont and are just a mainstream thing...well used to be, now most ppl make fun of tribal tats.

    I have a decent amount of tattoos, but 3/4 of them actually have some sort of sentimental purpose behind them. Most all of mine i got at a cerain point in my life where i was commemorating someone, or symbols that represent values/morals that i take very seriously. I do have a couple designs i got just for the hell of it, but most of mine actually mean something to me...so, are tats for beta males? Imo it depends on the person and/or what they had put on them

    And damn, poor flex. Couldnt imagine looking like that after the monster he used to be

    Comment


    • #3
      Agree 100% matt. Tats with real meaning are different than what flex was clearly trying to do there.

      Comment


      • #4
        Lee Priest has some stupid tats including one on the face too but at least he still has a decent build. And not all tribal tats are stupid look at the rocks.

        Comment


        • #5
          Think about Scott Steiner after he destroyed his chest. LOL @ the attempts to cover up.

          Comment


          • #6
            Great thread

            I hate tattoos generally, I think the human body looks amazing without help

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TrapsBrah View Post
              Lee Priest has some stupid tats including one on the face too but at least he still has a decent build. And not all tribal tats are stupid look at the rocks.

              I was talking about simple tribal stuff like on flex. What the Rock has actually is a piece with sybols, etc that more than likely come from.his heritage that have a purpose and meaning. Rocks shit does look good to me. I have two small tribal bands that wrap around the lower part of my forearms above my wrists. Used a baseline and had all my other stuff put above that up to my elbows. Wish i never would have got them but i was young and stupid and jumped the 90's bandwagon when tribal was the "in" thing.lol. Just glad theyre very small and not something like flex got

              Comment


              • #8
                Still say rock would look better without it. Tats are too mainstream now.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Less alpha. The guy had kidney failure. Will always be one of the greats.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    He will always be THE GREATEST IMO. BUT, the question of why he got those tats still remains. He would never have done such a thing when he had supreme confidence IMO.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                      Think about Scott Steiner after he destroyed his chest. LOL @ the attempts to cover up.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X