i would have Flex beating ronnie in 99 Mr O.
i am more a fan of shape and a certain look then then anything else.
Announcement
Collapse
Truest 199 Mr Olympia Vid
Collapse
X
-
He has definition but just one huge muscle there isn't any separation.
Leave a comment:
-
just to be clear I'm not saying ron was good for all his wins, and I'm generally a bigger fan of Flex's physique. But I cannot justify Flex beating ronnie here, ron is just a bigger more exagerated physique with elements that flex don't have, prefer flexes midsection and shoulder shape, glute ham tie in, thats it
Leave a comment:
-
watch when he properly flexes his thighs, I see no lack of definition and cuts compared to others in this year, in fact his sweep is the best there alsoOriginally posted by BEAST View PostIt doesn't matter what year. It's his genetics.
Ronnie Coleman Mr. Olympia 1999 Part 3 - Video Dailymotion
Leave a comment:
-
I don't understand these guys who blaberring about bodybuilding shows are won from the back bs. I don't give shit what kind of back you have if he has shit gut, gyno chest, shitty legs, how or why should he win? Coleman's legs were always big and lean but he didn't have the deep cuts like everybody else did. So how do you give the show to a guy who has good back but not so good legs? IMO legs are much more important than back since it is half of your body.
Leave a comment:
-
True, very true, but coleman doesn't look bad that year, sure flex'abs are a litte prettier but he's got no lats from the front, not enough there to over compensate for colemans back.Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Postyou should also look best from the front.
If shows were won from the front, Gary Strydon and Dennis wold woulda had an O
Leave a comment:



Leave a comment: