Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Truest 199 Mr Olympia Vid

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bouncer
    replied
    i would have Flex beating ronnie in 99 Mr O.

    i am more a fan of shape and a certain look then then anything else.

    Leave a comment:


  • BEAST
    replied
    He has definition but just one huge muscle there isn't any separation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Originally posted by BEAST View Post
    Maybe this will put it in perspective for you. :D

    again you post a later pic, looks like 2004 onwards of ron, I say again I'm talking about 1999, which IMO was his best look:thumup:

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    just to be clear I'm not saying ron was good for all his wins, and I'm generally a bigger fan of Flex's physique. But I cannot justify Flex beating ronnie here, ron is just a bigger more exagerated physique with elements that flex don't have, prefer flexes midsection and shoulder shape, glute ham tie in, thats it

    Leave a comment:


  • BEAST
    replied
    Maybe this will put it in perspective for you. :D

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Originally posted by BEAST View Post
    It doesn't matter what year. It's his genetics.
    watch when he properly flexes his thighs, I see no lack of definition and cuts compared to others in this year, in fact his sweep is the best there also
    Ronnie Coleman Mr. Olympia 1999 Part 3 - Video Dailymotion

    Leave a comment:


  • BEAST
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr incredible View Post
    That wasn't 1999 though beast
    It doesn't matter what year. It's his genetics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    That wasn't 1999 though beast

    Leave a comment:


  • BEAST
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr incredible View Post
    his legs look awsome flexed, no?
    Nope not IMO.



    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    his legs look awsome flexed, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • BEAST
    replied
    I don't understand these guys who blaberring about bodybuilding shows are won from the back bs. I don't give shit what kind of back you have if he has shit gut, gyno chest, shitty legs, how or why should he win? Coleman's legs were always big and lean but he didn't have the deep cuts like everybody else did. So how do you give the show to a guy who has good back but not so good legs? IMO legs are much more important than back since it is half of your body.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    here comes dumpy the box
    Mr. Olympia 1999- Jay Cutler - YouTube

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Post
    you should also look best from the front.
    True, very true, but coleman doesn't look bad that year, sure flex'abs are a litte prettier but he's got no lats from the front, not enough there to over compensate for colemans back.
    If shows were won from the front, Gary Strydon and Dennis wold woulda had an O

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr incredible View Post
    gotta have a great back to win the O, Arnold, haney, dozza, coleman
    you should also look best from the front.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    gotta have a great back to win the O, Arnold, haney, dozza, coleman

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X