Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Another Pro. caught in the mix(AAS)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by VeggieLifterGal
    I've never heard that statistic before, and I doubt it highly. I know maybe 1000 women at college (or more) and I think 3 have been raped, most in a date situation. 3 out of 5 is a false statistic, or else the NY/NJ/PA area is a total anomaly.
    in CA, if you call any rape-center hotline they'll give you number. perhpas it's "fudged" just a bit - i dunno, but here in San Diego, i hear about it almost as a daily occurance on the news or whatnot. they're also including those that don't report the date-rape scenarios.

    Comment


    • #17
      The risk is always there. Be careful.

      Comment


      • #18
        3 out of 5 is much higher than reality. Most women have not been raped, in date situation or otherwise. 3 out of 5 statistic assumes that most have. That's inaccurate. I've seen some bullshit propaganda posters that say things like inappropriate touching (like someone grabbing your boob) counts as rape. Give me a break! The people who make those posters must be making those stats.

        Comment


        • #19
          as a sexual assault victims advocate i know a little about this, 3-5 being raped is too high a statistic. 1 out of 3 women are SEXUALLY ASSAULTED (there's a difference between that and rape) before the age of 18 alone though, and that statistic grows more slowly, but steadily from that point on. i'm not sure what your relationship w/ those 1000 girls is VLG, but something tells me that's not how they start conversations w/ people, or even get into with people they know moderately well. the diff b/w rape and sexual assault is penetration, whether digital, with ones genitals, or w/ a foreign object. discounting someones feelings because they still WERE and FELT violated for having been groped is doing rapists a favor, where do you think they start? w/ sodomy? yes this crime is under-reported, yes it's harder to convict people for, yes i know broken families because of pedophile fathers, brothers, and even mothers. but one body-builder who's job is one that includes massive risks & paltry pay (read: he's actually doing a service to the community and world), and they're going to make an example of him... i'm with whoever said "nice job, suits in DC." no offense vlg, but i'd rather knock and rant at the suits who've created this mess and the rapists who make this happen, then the "propaganda" spewing people who are at least trying to do something to better their community, make people more aware of this situation, help those who HAVE been assaulted, and in almost all cases, like myself, do so as volunteers.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by IntensityX
            what about a cop from TX,how can Coleman get away with it and not him :rolleyes:
            Ronnie was only a Reserve but he had a valid prescription for his GH and AAS from a Doctor. Most pro's have Legit scripts written up for them to cover their asses but most of the time they usually add more then what the doctor prescribes. So I hear ;)

            Comment

            Working...
            X