Rugby vs. gridiron arguments have been taking place since the beginning of time.
Comparisons are a waste of time. They are completely different games, except for the fact that both have oval balls.
The key difference is the level of specialization - in rugby all players are required to be able to carry the ball and do at least some basic level of passing and catching the ball. This reduces the variability between the forwards and the backs in size, speed, etc. In gridiron, the rules encourage specialization, which is why you see superfast backs and behemoth linemen.
The best rugby players in the world can become NFL players at specific positions and the best NFL players, especially running backs, receivers, linebackers and tight ends can become excellent rugby players. The talent to catch a ball, wrong-step a defender and have that extra bolt of speed is going to stand one in good stead in either code.
I played rugby for many years and love the game. I have never played gridiron but love watching it. I have room in my heart for both games.
Comparisons are a waste of time. They are completely different games, except for the fact that both have oval balls.
The key difference is the level of specialization - in rugby all players are required to be able to carry the ball and do at least some basic level of passing and catching the ball. This reduces the variability between the forwards and the backs in size, speed, etc. In gridiron, the rules encourage specialization, which is why you see superfast backs and behemoth linemen.
The best rugby players in the world can become NFL players at specific positions and the best NFL players, especially running backs, receivers, linebackers and tight ends can become excellent rugby players. The talent to catch a ball, wrong-step a defender and have that extra bolt of speed is going to stand one in good stead in either code.
I played rugby for many years and love the game. I have never played gridiron but love watching it. I have room in my heart for both games.



Comment