The Truth of 9/11

[mountainman]

i truely admire a post where adults can share thoughts and post questions on a very opinionated subject

for this i offer a video that is available on google video called
loose change 2nd edition
google search it and watch,
mabey it can answer 1 of many questions or mabey it ads to millions more
I found it very interesting and the people that did it also back up all their statements with facts.


again to all that contribute thank you

[Primal Instinct]

In the interest of fairness in presenting both sides of this topic, read this and try not to laugh too hard even though it is listed as a "fact sheet". Attempt to let these NEW arguments convince you or sway you towards the official government propaganda side. Let it assauge your concerns about valid questions that I and others here had prompted on this site. Mind you, it took a full two years to come up with this newly released report by NIST - at the insistance of other agencies within the federal government (FEMA, FBI, DOT, etc.,) who are being put under the microscope by certain independent investigators and groups, INCLUDING victims' families. Keep in mind that NIST is NOT an independent agency. It IS a federal agency under federal direction and federal management:
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster


Soak it all in for now and I will happily disseminate it for all of you later. Hint: pay attention to what the Q&A DOESN'T say or how it deftly manuevers around some of the most uncomfortable and inexplicable questions. You'll understand much more later after I explain. I promise.

[Shibby]

Ok, so there is plenty points to each side for people to make there own decision on fall of the buildings.

Now lets move on to the plane crash at the Pentagon.

[Bouncer]

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html

[Kayak Jones]

Ok, so there is plenty points to each side for people to make there own decision on fall of the buildings.

Now lets move on to the plane crash at the Pentagon.

From an MSNBC article concerning conspiracy theorists:

"They don't do their homework; it's a kind of charlatanism," Berlet says over the phone. "They say there's no debris on the lawn in front of the Pentagon, but they base their analysis on a photo on the Internet . That's like analyzing an impressionist painting by looking at a postcard."

Now comes a loud sigh.

"I love 'The X-Files' but I don't base my research on it," he says. "My vision of hell is having to review these [conspiracy] books over and over again."


Please PI, tell me we can at least begin with there actually was a plane involved.

[coffee-guy]

Another thing to consider for the pro-government cover story proponents:
9/11 Controlled Demolitions of September 11, 2001

Please explain the explosions... :hmmm:

Great video...

Is there an entire clip of the event that the MIT Engineer (speaker-Greg?) was addressing....

[Primal Instinct]

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html

If you can find the time, read this one, B. Tell me if you think PM has any valid points left afterwards. PM is basically shredded and exposed in a very damning point-by-point rebuttal. Jim Hoffman certainly knows his stuff.

Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth

[Gainward]

nice show on history channel about it at the moment. Not sayin its right or wrong just worth watching