Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Kobe is gonna walk!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kobe is gonna walk!

    EAGLE, Colo. -- Kobe Bryant's accuser showed up for her rape exam wearing underpants containing another man's sperm, a startling discovery that defense lawyers called "compelling evidence" the NBA star is innocent.

    But Bryant's preliminary hearing ended Wednesday with prosecutors telling a judge there was "uncontradicted" evidence that the Los Angeles Lakers' guard raped the 19-year-old woman at a mountain resort.

    "He held her by the back of the neck with his hand during sexual intercourse," prosecutor Greg Chrittenden said. "He lifted up her skirt. She said 'no.' He pulled down her underpants and she said 'no.' He penetrated her from behind and she cried."

    Judge Frederick Gannett said he hoped to rule by Monday whether Bryant will have to stand trial on a sexual assault charge that could send him to prison for life.

    Six days after prosecutors revealed details of the alleged attack, it was the defense's turn to question the lead detective in the case about what happened the night of June 30 at the resort where she worked.

    Bryant attorney Pamela Mackey wasted no time getting Detective Doug Winters to say that the yellow underwear the woman wore to her rape exam at a nearby hospital the next day contained sperm from another man, along with Caucasian pubic hair.

    The 25-year-old Bryant, who is black, contends he had consensual sex with the woman.

    Winters said the woman told him she had consensual sex with another man on June 27 or June 28 and used a condom, backing earlier defense suggestions she was sexually active before her encounter with Bryant.

    Winters also said two pairs of panties from the woman were tested -- one from the night of June 30, the other being the one she wore to a hospital for an exam the next day.

    The latter pair contained blood and semen, Winters said.

    "The accuser arrived at the hospital wearing panties with someone else's semen and sperm in them, not that of Mr. Bryant, correct?" Mackey asked.

    "That's correct," Winters responded.

    Mackey suggested injuries found during the woman's exam could have come from having repeated sex, a contention she first made in court last week.

    The defense contends the tests on the underpants provide Bryant with "compelling evidence of innocence."

    Stan Goldman, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said the argument might be more of a public relations move.

    "The defense may be spinning this more for the public than the court," he said. "It's impressive, but its negative public relations value for the prosecution is more significant than its legal value."

    Bryant, who faces a possible life prison term if convicted, sat stoically with his hands folded watching his attorney tear apart the prosecution's version of the case. Occasionally, he leaned over and talked to his other lawyer, Hal Haddon.

    Mackey, who was subdued while questioning Winters, also managed to introduce something prosecutors didn't talk about last week -- a statement by the night auditor at the hotel who was the first person the accuser saw when she left Bryant's room.

    The night auditor sent police a letter saying she saw the woman as she came back to the front desk at the Cordillera Lodge & Spa.

    "What the night auditor says in her letter is the accuser did not look or sound as if there had been any problem," Mackey said, asking Winters "Correct?"

    "Yes," Winters responded.

    Legal experts said the evidence of the woman's previous sexual partners and her admission she was excited to meet Bryant makes the prosecution's case appear weak.

    "It's a disaster for the prosecution," Eagle attorney Jim Fahrenholtz said.

  • #2
    I told her to throw away those panties after we recked it on june 28th. :D

    Comment


    • #3
      Interesting...

      Comment


      • #4
        wow

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by INTIMID8OR3
          If it was one of us our ass would be in jail picking soap up with our feet ....
          Yeah but that dosn't mean we were quilty. It just means we didn't have the money for a proper defense. I have always thought that this girl was just trying to get paid.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by INTIMID8OR3
            In my opinion having money in our justice system at times gives someone THE inappropriate defense, ala "OJ' :D I see what you mean i just tend to think it happened to fast for her to be thnking about money and KOBE just fucked up....:( Also if it was really all about money with this girl she'd already be sitting on millions but her attorneys have yet to plea bargin with the defense and thats really unusual in these cases with high profile people......... I think she's one tuff little lady and she feels KOBE got his way that night now she wants her say and way ..
            But this way will get her more money, plus she becomes a star like Monica Lewinski. You notice ever since the president, monica still hasn't left the spot light.

            Originally posted by INTIMID8OR3
            I have a feeling you'd like this case so much more if it were two lesbians ...:rofl:
            Now that would be a cool court case. Like Christina sexually assaulting Britney :agree: Talk about the biggest court case ever :drool:

            Comment


            • #7
              $$$ can buy anything....

              Comment


              • #8
                "He held her by the back of the neck with his hand during sexual intercourse," prosecutor Greg Chrittenden said. "He lifted up her skirt. She said 'no.' He pulled down her underpants and she said 'no.' He penetrated her from behind and she cried."
                Thats all that matters. If this indeed happened or if it did not happen.



                The night auditor sent police a letter saying she saw the woman as she came back to the front desk at the Cordillera Lodge & Spa.

                "What the night auditor says in her letter is the accuser did not look or sound as if there had been any problem," Mackey said, asking Winters "Correct?"

                "Yes," Winters responded.
                The night auditor can tell if someone has been raped or assaulted? Had Kobe assaulted me, I doubt anyone could tell by just looking at me as I exited the building. Assuredly I would compose myself and try to react logically about it. Everyone would react a little different then the next person. Who could possibly tell what had transpired without witnessing it or being told directly.

                Legal experts said the evidence of the woman's previous sexual partners and her admission she was excited to meet Bryant makes the prosecution's case appear weak.
                I would be excited to meet Kobe too. I like having various sexual partners too. But WTF does that have to do with the fact of whether its "OK" to rape an excited and sexually active person?
                Imagine if that was you or me?


                Her transgessions are not the subject matter at hand. If they were, she would be on trial. She could be a horrible individuall. But thats not the subject matter.

                For her sake, I hope it never happened.

                But Kobe already admitted to cheating on his wife. As such he is a known liar. He lied on his marriage day, unless of course his wedding vows did not include being faithfull :rolleyes: . Since we know thats not the case, his reputation is far worse then hers.

                For his sake I hope she isn't liing and trying to ruin him.

                :dunno:

                Comment

                Working...
                X