Stephen Hawking: The Afterlife Is A Fairy Tale For People Who Are Afraid Of The Dark

[Shibby]

haha for sure home boy I'll take my chances with the little faith in unknown. If I'm wrong, wtf I got to lose - I just want to live my life not fail and be too big for the fucking coffin end of the day.

Pascal's Wager - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Bouncer]

I wasn't putting myself on the level of legendary scientists, I was just making the point that have my my own opinion that I have developed from learning. You quote people that say things similar to what I say. :weights:

If I quoted others instead of voicing my own thoughts you would be ok with that? :hibb:

You of all people should know I not shy of voicing my own opinion and what I think.

I simply quote someone on a high level who I agree with in order to start a thread or prove a point to low lifes like gods son. :D

[dna9488]

So, deca is smart now? That's cool. Didn't know you had a MS in science.

Where were you when I needed help interpreting Gas Chromatography spikes in my lab based on different concentrations of acids in a blood sample?

[Bouncer]

So, deca is smart now? That's cool. Didn't know you had a MS in science.

Where were you when I needed help interpreting Gas Chromatography spikes in my lab based on different concentrations of acids in a blood sample?

Haha, that was my point. Never once has it been obvious that he has that sort of background. He will say "I don't come here to work" but I'm not buying that rubbish.

[dna9488]

Haha, that was my point. Never once has it been obvious that he has that sort of background. He will say "I don't come here to work" but I'm not buying that rubbish.

maybe the board should pay him to post lol

[Shibby]

You of all people should know I not shy of voicing my own opinion and what I think.

I simply quote someone on a high level who I agree with in order to start a thread or prove a point to low lifes like gods son. :D

I'm just messing with you mostly, but it's because of science that I see things the way I do. The same as those people you quote :D

[Bouncer]

I'm just messing with you mostly, but it's because of science that I see things the way I do. The same as those people you quote :D

It's because of science that I see things the way I do. I guess I am the same as hawking? Lol

[Shibby]

It's because of science that I see things the way I do. I guess I am the same as hawking? Lol

Don't be purposely dense. Thinking similar in concept to Hawking's is not the same as being him. You connect with him because his mind works like yours. He is just more advanced.

[blm]

Trust me, it's not the black and white world you think it is.

That is why I don't even bother getting into debates with him about anything really. Oddly, I do agree on a lot of his 'opinions' on this matter, but he sounds like gods son and his 'christian' beliefs. He speaks as if what he reads and understands is the absolute and that's all there is to it. As if somehow he truly knows something that we all don't. lol.

[wnabeabeast]

only difference being that he is one of the greatest scientist of the 20th and 21st century and the average guy is not...

I don't give a shit what kind of scientist or what his IQ is he knows no more than anybody else when it comes to matters of before humanity or any other living organism or what happens after life. Remember it's called big bang theory not big bang fact and same goes for the after life. No body knows what happens for a fact. You can sit there and argue about before or after life or is there god or not who creates humans and other objective subjects until you turn blue in the face you will get no where.

Unless Stephen Hawking died and lived amongs dead and came back with some solid fact answers he can suck my balls and shut the fuck up.
So again to me he is no different then average guy who is writing a science fiction books to make a living.

[Shibby]

Remember it's called big bang theory not big bang fact

The only problem with trying to make a point with this statement is that there are many things we talk about as fact but is technically a theory. Like... gravitational theory, known to most as just gravity :D

[wnabeabeast]

when it comes to matters of before humanity or any other living organism or what happens after life. Remember it's called big bang theory not big bang fact.

The only problem with trying to make a point with this statement is that there are many things we talk about as fact but is technically a theory. Like... gravitational theory, known to most as just gravity :D

If you gonna take words out of my post do it right and read above. You know exactly what I mean. I'm talking about a theory that we believe how universe was created not about something that we experience in daily basis like gravity in fact we live with it every moment of our lives and to me that makes it a fact not a theory now the big bang on the other hand is a theory not a fact. Now what if the universe wasn't created? what if it was there all along? how can a human being put a an age to universe? Who comes up with 16 or 17 billion years? what if universe was around way before then?

So yes shibby it's called a big bang theory not a big bang fact.

[Shibby]

You are trying to use science to prove your point but are only making it look like you have a very small understanding of it. Hawking's has an enormous grasp on things we could never begin to understand. Trying to prove your point by saying something is defined as theory for a reason doesn't work since you are distorting the definition of theory to make it fit where it doesn't. The rest of your post is what it is.

[wnabeabeast]

You are trying to use science to prove your point but are only making it look like you have a very small understanding of it. Hawking's has an enormous grasp on things we could never begin to understand. Trying to prove your point by saying something is defined as theory for a reason doesn't work since you are distorting the definition of theory to make it fit where it doesn't. The rest of your post is what it is.

My point has nothing to do with my understanding of creation of the universe. I'm just bringing up those questions to show that what we believe may not be answer. With all the advances in science who are we to say what we believe will not change in two or three hundred years from now

[Shibby]

Not to sound sarcastic, but do you know what makes something a scientific theory vs hypothesis?