Man refuses to stop at internal checkpoints

[Mr I]

» Video: Man Refuses To Comply With Internal Checkpoints Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
:clapback:

[blm]

I'm afraid to click on anything with Alex Jones' name on it. I might end up as mentally deranged as you.

[Mr I]

I'm afraid to click on anything with Alex Jones' name on it. I might end up as mentally deranged as you.

I don't look on his stuff generally either, he's too much. I find this funny just in the sense that its one of those situations where most people just roll like cattle to the state, then the odd one dares to ask and say WTF?

[Bouncer]

most people just roll like cattle to the state, then the odd one dares to ask and say WTF?

or maybe they are setup for a purpose beyond "control of the man" you fucken clown. you are a follower of conspiracy as much as you claim i am a follower of "the state".

im not one of those "everything the gov says and does i follow" type people. i just am not someone that will blindly follow the fear mongering media and loony tunes like you!

[Mr I]

or maybe they are setup for a purpose beyond "control of the man" you fucken clown. you are a follower of conspiracy as much as you claim i am a follower of "the state".

im not one of those "everything the gov says and does i follow" type people. i just am not someone that will blindly follow the fear mongering media and loony tunes like you!

chill your beans pal jeez, you say tomaeto I say tomaato, much of a muchness.

Illuminati is a conspiracy theory bro, I don't follow that in its purest sense but I do believe many ostensibly state/political/health initiatives are in fact driven by a thinly veiled corporate driver. You also believe this in many cases so stop being pot calling kettle black.:thumup:

[BEAST]

Tell you what, that guy would've had zero chance of being let go if he looked Mexican and had a Spanish accent. So he is full of shit. Giving people false idea of what can they do or say in a situation like that.

[Bouncer]

Yea let me see Dana.try that! Lolz

[Scrumhalf]

The Supreme Court has declared that checkpoints with probable cause are not a violation of the Fourth Amemdment.

[Mr I]

Well this guy is black and they didn't do shit in NYC

[Orignal full version] 1 Marine vs. 30 Cops (By. J. handy) - YouTube

[Mr I]

The Supreme Court has declared that checkpoints with probable cause are not a violation of the Fourth Amemdment.

'Probable Cause' ergo without such, they can't stop you?

[rado]

The Supreme Court has declared that checkpoints with probable cause are not a violation of the Fourth Amemdment.

And here there's none....

[Turbo3000]

The Supreme Court has declared that checkpoints with probable cause are not a violation of the Fourth Amemdment.

They declared that it is ok if there is NO probable cause. Reason why road blocks can exist. SC is just a bunch of puppets.

[Scrumhalf]

They declared that it is ok if there is NO probable cause. Reason why road blocks can exist. SC is just a bunch of puppets.

Not so sure about that bro... look at the third paragraph of the "Opinion" section below:

United States v. Martinez-Fuerte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Mr I]

Agree with scrum, needs to be probable cause although the fact and degree of burden of proof of probable cause is low in the case of perminent check points, not temporary ones. I read alot of legal documents so thats my take

[Turbo3000]

Road blocks are legal in America, they have been challenged time and time again. The SC states that it is legal, when in reality it isn't since there is NO probable cause. I am talking about a basic road block, often times masked as a sobriety checkpoint. Done purely to generate revenue.