Zeitgeist - Movies

[Bouncer]

Carl in it? I am there!

[Scrumhalf]

Zeitgeist = utter and complete horseshit.

See below for thorough debunking with lots of references:

Zeitgeist: The Movie, Myths, and Motivations

[Mr I]

Zeitgeist = utter and complete horseshit.

See below for thorough debunking with lots of references:

Zeitgeist: The Movie, Myths, and Motivations

Well they back most of bouncers theories lol! Just watch it objectively scrum instead of reading ands believing negativity from another source, build a balanced view

[Scrumhalf]

Well they back most of bouncers theories lol! Just watch it objectively scrum instead of reading ands believing negativity from another source, build a balanced view

No.

I don't need to watch garbage objectively to know it is garbage. I don't need to try homeopathy myself to conclude that it doesn't work. I can objectively look at the criticisms that other people I respect have, people who can use logic and the scientific method to analyze claims. A balanced view is choosing between two valid claims, not between a valid and an invalid claim. This is a bit like the people who want intelligent design taught in school to present a "balanced view." No, pitting pseudoscience against science is not achieving balance.

[Bouncer]

A balanced view is choosing between two valid claims, not between a valid and an invalid claim. This is a bit like the people who want intelligent design taught in school to present a "balanced view." No, pitting pseudoscience against science is not achieving balance.

GOD DAMN RIGHT PREACH ON BROTHER PREACH ON!!

[Mr I]

No.

I don't need to watch garbage objectively to know it is garbage. I don't need to try homeopathy myself to conclude that it doesn't work. I can objectively look at the criticisms that other people I respect have, people who can use logic and the scientific method to analyze claims. A balanced view is choosing between two valid claims, not between a valid and an invalid claim. This is a bit like the people who want intelligent design taught in school to present a "balanced view." No, pitting pseudoscience against science is not achieving balance.

Such blind prejudice, so sad

[Scrumhalf]

Yes, I have a deep seated prejudice against irrational pseudoscientific garbage.

[Mr I]

Yes, I have a deep seated prejudice against irrational pseudoscientific garbage.

well without watching you'll never know what it is thats all I'm saying, and the amount of stuff you watch that you may not totally agree with.

[Bouncer]

Mr I do you need to eat dogshit to know that it taste like shit?

[Mr I]

^ we'll it seems a few on here rate the movie.

Carl sagen was part of it, so your saying he's dogshit, honestly bro ?

[Bouncer]

^ we'll it seems a few on here rate the movie.

Carl sagen was part of it, so your saying he's dogshit, honestly bro ?

Carl Sagan was used by the directors to try to prove some rubbish point or was he himself part of the movie?

How old is the movie? Lol

[Mr I]

Carl Sagan was used by the directors to try to prove some rubbish point or was he himself part of the movie?

How old is the movie? Lol

The first one was 2007, interestingly one of the segments talked about financial markets and how they work and how they manipulate, cause crashes on purpose while tipping each other off as to how they can profit from it and time their investments, goes right into detail on it. Since then out came true! If you recall the lehmans collapse was about september 2008, well after the documentary, and amongst other things; hedging, interest rate fixing, over lending then calling in debts unneccassarily have all been huge contributors. The film was spot on in what it called bro, not saying it was all right, I simply don't have the knowledge on some of thee content but I found it very educational.

There have been two other additional zeitguest film documentaries, one 2010 one I think 2011 or something.

If you have some knowledge of economics and know a kyle ascot financial markets that ferment was fascinating, there were other segments telling about religion which I think you would have a good laugh at.

its not like if you watch it you are by definition a total convert believer its just very interesting, bit weird and slow to start with but definitely worth awatch

[Mr I]

And by the way, I have more alignment with zeitgeist theory than iluminati, zeitgeist suggests that corporate banks control and endebt governments by strategy. In contrast illuminati suggests that this is by collaboration with some secret connection. To me its natural that any company seeks to maximise profit, in thee case of banks the more they lend, the more they earn, adlai the more they lend the more control they excerpt, they will naturally do this and while I'm sure therese are complicit governments I think the problem is more one of weakness and incompetence on the part of our states. Also think that the fed reserve is entirely of its own agenda, irrespective if government.

[Bouncer]

Carl Sagan has been dead for over15 years thus he wasn't part of the movie.

They used his name and clips of him to twist his words and take him out of context to try and back up their propaganda horse shit.

[Bouncer]

And by the way, I have more alignment with zeitgeist theory than iluminati, zeitgeist suggests that corporate banks control and endebt governments by strategy. In contrast illuminati suggests that this is by collaboration with some secret connection. To me its natural that any company seeks to maximise profit, in thee case of banks the more they lend, the more they earn, adlai the more they lend the more control they excerpt, they will naturally do this and while I'm sure therese are complicit governments I think the problem is more one of weakness and incompetence on the part of our states. Also think that the fed reserve is entirely of its own agenda, irrespective if government.

How long have you been off test? Your mind is wondering big time bro. Only thing I know about illuminati was 2pac called himself that. Lol