Tweet
Simple poll,just to see peoples thoughts
-
6Plane impact and resultant effects66.67%4Bomb or other16.67%1Undecided16.67%1 -
Well, its obvious planes hit the buildings but I've seen info that makes me think there where other things along with the planes. The Pentagon seems to not have been hit by a plane??? But its hard for me to believe our government would kill our own citizens. -
could be that incendiary/thermolite was planted before hand by the same terrorists frankComment
-
planes. no conspiracy.
did the gov use the situation to implement laws like the Patriot Act that would have never been possible pre 9/11... absolutely.Comment
-
Exactly! They use fear as a tool. Which in fact is the definition of terrorism.Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View PostComment
-
Anything is possible. But the Pentagon attack really looks like it was a missel or something.Originally posted by Mr incredible View PostComment
-
There is a security camera video that shows the plane impacting the pentagon..do a search Im sure you can find it.Originally posted by FrankTheTank55 View PostComment
-
-
your a fucking loon sometimes MR I... holy fuck man...Do you have any fucking clue how much of that shit would have to be planted to bring down a building like that? how much explosives training have you had...I have had quite a bit...no fucking chance..Originally posted by Mr incredible View PostComment
-
Do you honestly think our fucking government could orchestrate and keep a conspiracy of that scale hidden for any length of time?
Seriously?
They can't even hide bribes, mistresses and DUIs.Comment
-
-
it shows an extremely fast moving object. The pentagon has never made sense to me.Originally posted by lipripper View PostComment
-
Well no I'm not a weapons expert but I know some about the structure of buildings as thats the field I work in.Originally posted by lipripper View Post
But just take a step back for a minute, just talk facts, if I spin that round on you, explosives have become more compact and more effective over time, you saw that IED vid bouncer put up earlier.
If you wanted to be sure to take down a building surely you would opt for explosives rather than flying a plane into it?
There are many examples of planes that have flown into buildings and the buildings haven't fallen down in perfect stacked precision format like all three buildings did, one that didn't even get hit. Also there are many examples of fires in buuldings that have raged for far longer and the buildings didn't even fall.
No conspiracy theory bro, remember oklahoma and others, they used bombs, and demolition specialist companies use explosives, not planes or fires.
your the expert tell me what you know about thermite, nano thermite (the fizz and sparkle before it explodes and watch the 9/11 footage) and cutter chargesLast edited by Mr I; 07-23-12, 04:48 PM.Comment
-
No idea, do you and lip seriously think that terrorists with fuck all training can hijack jumbo jets and fly them with such skill to imopact two of america's most iconic buildings right in the centre of manhatton and pass right by all of the mightly america's security and forces? I'm not saying they didn't, but if you'd asked me before, I'd have said a series of planted explosives on timers was more likely, perhaps both happenedOriginally posted by decadecadeca View PostComment
-
Do something for me, forget the conspiracy theory background, and replace it with the idea that this was a terrorist planned attack, but that perhaps there was more than just planes involved.
Watch this through and I swear you'll think different
2012 - NEWEST 9/11 DOCUMENTARY - PROOF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB .mp4 - YouTubeComment
Comment