Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

What Really Causes Heart Disease

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Really Causes Heart Disease

    World Renown Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease

    We physicians with all our training, knowledge and authority often acquire a rather large ego that tends to make it difficult to admit we are wrong. So, here it is. I freely admit to being wrong.. As a heart surgeon with 25 years experience, having performed over 5,000 open-heart surgeries,today is my day to right the wrong with medical and scientific fact.

    I trained for many years with other prominent physicians labelled “opinion makers.” Bombarded with scientific literature, continually attending education seminars, we opinion makers insisted heart disease resulted from the simple fact of elevated blood cholesterol.

    The only accepted therapy was prescribing medications to lower cholesterol and a diet that severely restricted fat intake. The latter of course we insisted would lower cholesterol and heart disease. Deviations from these recommendations were considered heresy and could quite possibly result in malpractice.

    It Is Not Working!

    These recommendations are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.

    The long-established dietary recommendations have created epidemics of obesity and diabetes, the consequences of which dwarf any historical plague in terms of mortality, human suffering and dire economic consequences.

    Despite the fact that 25% of the population takes expensive statin medications and despite the fact we have reduced the fat content of our diets, more Americans will die this year of heart disease than ever before.

    Statistics from the American Heart Association show that 75 million Americans currently suffer from heart disease, 20 million have diabetes and 57 million have pre-diabetes. These disorders are affecting younger and younger people in greater numbers every year.

    Simply stated, without inflammation being present in the body, there is no way that cholesterol would accumulate in the wall of the blood vessel and cause heart disease and strokes. Without inflammation, cholesterol would move freely throughout the body as nature intended. It is inflammation that causes cholesterol to become trapped.

    Inflammation is not complicated -- it is quite simply your body's natural defence to a foreign invader such as a bacteria, toxin or virus. The cycle of inflammation is perfect in how it protects your body from these bacterial and viral invaders. However, if we chronically expose the body to injury by toxins or foods the human body was never designed to process,a condition occurs called chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is just as harmful as acute inflammation is beneficial.

    What thoughtful person would willfully expose himself repeatedly to foods or other substances that are known to cause injury to the body? Well,smokers perhaps, but at least they made that choice willfully.

    The rest of us have simply followed the recommended mainstream dietthat is low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, not knowing we were causing repeated injury to our blood vessels. Thisrepeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.

    Let me repeat that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine.

    What are the biggest culprits of chronic inflammation? Quite simply, they are the overload of simple, highly processed carbohydrates (sugar, flour and all the products made from them) and the excess consumption of omega-6 vegetable oils like soybean, corn and sunflower that are found in many processed foods.

    Take a moment to visualize rubbing a stiff brush repeatedly over soft skin until it becomes quite red and nearly bleeding. you kept this up several times a day, every day for five years. If you could tolerate this painful brushing, you would have a bleeding, swollen infected area that became worse with each repeated injury. This is a good way to visualize the inflammatory process that could be going on in your body right now.

    Regardless of where the inflammatory process occurs, externally or internally, it is the same. I have peered inside thousands upon thousands of arteries. A diseased artery looks as if someone took a brush and scrubbed repeatedly against its wall. Several times a day, every day, the foods we eat create small injuries compounding into more injuries, causing the body to respond continuously and appropriately with inflammation.

    While we savor the tantalizing taste of a sweet roll, our bodies respond alarmingly as if a foreign invader arrived declaring war. Foods loaded with sugars and simple carbohydrates, or processed withomega-6 oils for long shelf life have been the mainstay of the American diet for six decades. These foods have been slowly poisoning everyone.

    How does eating a simple sweet roll create a cascade of inflammation to make you sick?

    Imagine spilling syrup on your keyboard and you have a visual of what occurs inside the cell. When we consume simple carbohydrates such as sugar, blood sugar rises rapidly. In response, your pancreas secretes insulin whose primary purpose is to drive sugar into each cell where it is stored for energy. If the cell is full and does not need glucose, it is rejected to avoid extra sugar gumming up the works.

    When your full cells reject the extra glucose, blood sugar rises producing more insulin and the glucose converts to stored fat.

    What does all this have to do with inflammation? Blood sugar is controlled in a very narrow range. Extra sugar molecules attach to a variety of proteins that in turn injure the blood vessel wall. This repeated injury to the blood vessel wall sets off inflammation. When you spike your blood sugar level several times a day, every day, it is exactly like taking sandpaper to the inside of your delicate blood vessels.

    While you may not be able to see it, rest assured it is there. I saw it in over 5,000 surgical patients spanning 25 years who all shared one common denominator -- inflammation in their arteries.

    Let’s get back to the sweet roll. That innocent looking goody not only contains sugars, it is baked in one of many omega-6 oils such as soybean. Chips and fries are soaked in soybean oil; processed foods are manufactured with omega-6 oils for longer shelf life. While omega-6’s are essential -they are part of every cell membrane controlling what goes in and out of the cell -- they must be in the correct balance with omega-3’s.

    If the balance shifts by consuming excessive omega-6, the cell membrane produces chemicals called cytokines that directly cause inflammation.

    Today’s mainstream American diet has produced an extreme imbalance of these two fats. The ratio of imbalance ranges from 15:1 to as high as 30:1 in favor of omega-6. That’s a tremendous amount of cytokines causing inflammation. In today’s food environment, a 3:1 ratio would be optimal and healthy.

    To make matters worse, the excess weight you are carrying from eating these foods creates overloaded fat cells that pour out large quantities of pro-inflammatory chemicals that add to the injury caused by having high blood sugar. The process that began with a sweet roll turns into a vicious cycle over time that creates heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes and finally, Alzheimer’s disease, as the inflammatory process continues unabated.

    There is no escaping the fact that the more we consume prepared and processed foods, the more we trip the inflammation switch little by little each day. The human body cannot process, nor was it designed to consume, foods packed with sugars and soaked in omega-6 oils.

    There is but one answer to quieting inflammation, and that is returning to foods closer to their natural state. To build muscle, eat more protein. Choose carbohydrates that are very complex such as colorful fruits and vegetables. Cut down on or eliminate inflammation- causing omega-6 fats like corn and soybean oil and the processed foods that are made from them.

    One tablespoon of corn oil contains 7,280 mg of omega-6; soybean contains 6,940 mg. Instead, use olive oil or butter from grass-fed beef.

    Animal fats contain less than 20% omega-6 and are much less likely to cause inflammation than the supposedly healthy oils labelled polyunsaturated. Forget the “science” that has been drummed into your head for decades. The science that saturated fat alone causes heart disease is non-existent. The science that saturated fat raises blood cholesterol is also very weak. Since we now know that cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease, the concern about saturated fat is even more absurd today.

    The cholesterol theory led to the no-fat, low-fat recommendations that in turn created the very foods now causing an epidemic of inflammation. Mainstream medicine made a terrible mistake when it advised people to avoid saturated fat in favor of foods high in omega-6 fats. We now have an epidemic of arterial inflammation leading to heart disease and other silent killers.

    What you can do is choose whole foods your grandmother served and not those your mom turned to as grocery store aisles filled with manufactured foods. By eliminating inflammatory foods and adding essential nutrients from fresh unprocessed food, you will reverse years of damage in your arteries and throughout your body from consuming the typical American diet.

    Dr. Dwight Lundell is the past Chief of Staff and Chief of Surgery at Banner Heart Hospital , Mesa , AZ. His private practice, Cardiac Care Center was in Mesa, AZ. Recently Dr. Lundell left surgery to focus on the nutritional treatment of heart disease. He is the founder of Healthy Humans Foundation that promotes human health with a focus on helping large corporations promote wellness. He is also the author of The Cure for Heart Disease and The Great Cholesterol Lie.

    "Let me repeat that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine."
    World Renown Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease

  • #2
    http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/lundell.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
      Come on man, wake up. These low fat, high carbohydrate diets are killing people. This guy is a former heart surgeon and he speaks the truth.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't care who the he'll he is. To assume he is speaking the truth just because he had an MD is an argument from authority, a classic fallacy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
          I don't care who the he'll he is. To assume he is speaking the truth just because he had an MD is an argument from authority, a classic fallacy.
          Studies back up what he's saying. Cholesterol and saturated fat are not the enemy here. It's inflammation.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Juiced1 View Post
            Studies back up what he's saying. Cholesterol and saturated fat are not the enemy here. It's inflammation.
            Not saying it isn't but I'd like pubmed references to where it says that the inflammation, if that's the cause, isn't caused by plaque that may originate from fat and cholesterol.

            Seems to me that this guy gave up his practice, has a variety of legal problems and as far as I can tell, is in the pockets of the alternative nutrition/supplement type companies. I reserve the right to be skeptical until I know that his claims are backed by randomized double blinded trials, or similar credible evidence.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
              Not saying it isn't but I'd like pubmed references to where it says that the inflammation, if that's the cause, isn't caused by plaque that may originate from fat and cholesterol.

              Seems to me that this guy gave up his practice, has a variety of legal problems and as far as I can tell, is in the pockets of the alternative nutrition/supplement type companies. I reserve the right to be skeptical until I know that his claims are backed by randomized double blinded trials, or similar credible evidence.
              such as trials funded by the producers of.statins or the governing.body FDA thats in the pockets of big corp pharma, just like monsato. Open your eyes bro

              i do agree that pub med does some good studies though, f you like pub med look up their study on cannabis oil and its anti.cancer properties. You will then begin to understand why the multi trillion dollar chemo and cancer pharma industry lobby so hard to keep cannabis illegal, after all, you cant easily patent a naturally occuring plant thats been around for.fifteen thousand years.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mr incredible View Post
                such as trials funded by the producers of.statins or the governing.body FDA thats in the pockets of big corp pharma, just like monsato. Open your eyes bro

                i do agree that pub med does some good studies though, f you like pub med look up their study on cannabis oil and its anti.cancer properties. You will then begin to understand why the multi trillion dollar chemo and cancer pharma industry lobby so hard to keep cannabis illegal, after all, you cant easily patent a naturally occuring plant thats been around for.fifteen thousand years.
                Pubmed doesn't "do" the studies.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
                  Not saying it isn't but I'd like pubmed references to where it says that the inflammation, if that's the cause, isn't caused by plaque that may originate from fat and cholesterol.

                  Seems to me that this guy gave up his practice, has a variety of legal problems and as far as I can tell, is in the pockets of the alternative nutrition/supplement type companies. I reserve the right to be skeptical until I know that his claims are backed by randomized double blinded trials, or similar credible evidence.
                  You think the pubmed sheep are going to report something against statins? You do know that big pharma would lose their ass if people stopped taking statins. Did you know statins are an anti-inflammatory? That's right. That's how they work. It's big business to keep everyone on that low fat high carb diet. Open your eyes man.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Turbo3000 View Post
                    Pubmed doesn't "do" the studies.
                    They control what's published and what is not. Also it's big pharma who funds studies so it's unlikely that an independant lab would have the resources themselves to do a study that discredits statins.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      LOL.... Do you guys even know what PubMed is?

                      It is just a database that has citations to peer reviewed papers published in journals. It doesn't publish anything or control anything.

                      Look, I am sure there are doctors that arent straight shooters and who over prescribe drugs or whatever. But if you are in the big pharma is bad by definition camp, I guess we don't have anything to discuss.

                      Think abou this for a second. If a company figures out a way to eliminate heart disease cancer, what do you think they would do? Quickly publish the information, corner the glory and the market, score a Nobel Prize or three, be known for posterity as the heroes who figured this out? .. Or would they hide the evidence in order to continue marketing ineffective drugs knowing full well that someone else could figure it out tomorrow and stea their thunder and put then out of business? Yep, option 2 sounds very logical. :retard:

                      I'm not saying that companies have not made mistakes. I'm not saying that pharmaceutical companies are not there to make money. After all they have shareholders to satisfy, but to insinuate a global cabal of big pharma in cahoots to suppress life saving medicines and treatments flies in the face of all available evidence.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Juiced1 View Post
                        They control what's published and what is not. Also it's big pharma who funds studies so it's unlikely that an independant lab would have the resources themselves to do a study that discredits statins.
                        They do not control what gets published.

                        You really need to start doing your own research, check the facts, and formulate your own opinion.

                        And again, big pharma does NOT fund every study.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
                          LOL.... Do you guys even know what PubMed is?

                          It is just a database that has citations to peer reviewed papers published in journals. It doesn't publish anything or control anything.

                          Look, I am sure there are doctors that arent straight shooters and who over prescribe drugs or whatever. But if you are in the big pharma is bad by definition camp, I guess we don't have anything to discuss.

                          Think abou this for a second. If a company figures out a way to eliminate heart disease cancer, what do you think they would do? Quickly publish the information, corner the glory and the market, score a Nobel Prize or three, be known for posterity as the heroes who figured this out? .. Or would they hide the evidence in order to continue marketing ineffective drugs knowing full well that someone else could figure it out tomorrow and stea their thunder and put then out of business? Yep, option 2 sounds very logical. :retard:

                          I'm not saying that companies have not made mistakes. I'm not saying that pharmaceutical companies are not there to make money. After all they have shareholders to satisfy, but to insinuate a global cabal of big pharma in cahoots to suppress life saving medicines and treatments flies in the face of all available evidence.
                          Please don't be so nieve. You are out of your mind if you think pharmaceutical companies give two shits about your health or well being. I usually agree with your opinion, but your opinion on big pharma is only true in a dream world.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Tell me about the billions spent to develop a medication to make your eyelash grow? Man that sounds like a huge problem in the world.

                            What about the numerous (about to be one added to the list) medications for ED, so many people are dying due to a limp dick.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Turbo3000 View Post
                              Please don't be so nieve. You are out of your mind if you think pharmaceutical companies give two shits about your health or well being. I usually agree with your opinion, but your opinion on big pharma is only true in a dream world.
                              They may not care about my well being. But they care about making money. And I can't think of a surer way of making money than to find the cure for an as-yet incurable disease. This is why we need to get our information from the right sources.

                              I have faith in well designed placebo controlled double or triple blinded studies from independent and academic researchers. I make sure I know if they investigators have any affiliation with the companies involved. If the researchers receive monetary support from the company, or if the work is done by the company itself, my radar goes off and I am cautious. If the trial design is flawed (I have a very good background in statistics as part of my professional training), my radar goes off. Nothing beats using your brain and thinking.

                              Not to beat my own drum, but to suggest that I am a pharma fanboi is selling me somewhat short.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X