Tweet
you guys ever hear of this app? shit is nuts man I know a young dude put this on his chicks phone. creepy for real he downloaded it to her phone it doesn't show up on her phone unless you go into settings and see what apps are running. he has complete control over her phone from wherever. showed me check this turned the microphone on her phone on she was at her sisters place you could hear everything in the room everyone was saying. can listen to all her phone calls gets all her txt msgs has this map quest type shit GPS can track her when she's in the car on the highways. I always knew this dude was smart and trouble but that's scary shit. I asked him why you do that for? he said he wants to know the truth.
-
-
The dude sounds like a complete dipshit. I'm sure he'd be totally cool with her doing that to him, because he's completely devoted and would never....ad nauseam....
If you need to find out if your partner is cheating on you, either they are...or you're too suspicious for a relationship anyway. Stay single and casually date people.
Need to know lol....believe me sometimes you will wish you never found out. -
TiSPY is targeted for parents monitoring/controlling their children's cell phone use but obviously it can be used like the aforementioned dumb ass.Comment
-
Fuck that. This is exactly the type of shit that makes me paranoid and the reason I keep my phone locked. Soon as the screen shuts off it requires a password to use it again. Its not that I am necessarily doing anything wrong, I just cant stand the idea of anyone knowing my every move, every word I say or type etc.. IMO NOBODY has the right to watch over you like that. Fucken creepers.Comment
-
Let me also point out, if a normal every day person can simply download an app, just imagine what LE and the gov have the power to do. not trying to sound like some conspiracy nut like mr i but they are definitely capable of such things and I can def see it happening in the future if it hasnt already happened.Comment
-
Any communication medium is capable of being monitored by law enforcement/government. Fact.Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View PostComment
-
Yea and smart phones are particularly scary because they are the ultimate spy device. Front facing/ back facing camera, micro phone/speaker, GPS, internet/email/text monitoring etc.. hell, smart phones can tell you how fast you are going in a car, train, etc.. They would literally give LE every single detail about you.Originally posted by blm View PostComment
-
All true. Everyone should keep these things in mind when conducting business and act accordingly, imo.Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View PostComment
-
phones are more of who you are as an individual today not just calling someone. this guy is wack man thats nuts. he said she was messing around on him and he listens to her get fucked. she has a brother I know sorta pretty cool guy so I let him know about his sister don't normally get into peoples shit but I thought the girl could be in danger for real.Comment
-
He is an insecure tool bro. If a friend of mine told me he did that shit to his girl I would definitely have to take a step back from that friend.Originally posted by dago View PostComment
-
Looks like that relationship is going places lol.....Comment
-
I didn't say friend B I said I know a young dude. I don't fuck w him like that.Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View PostComment
-
Thanks for sharingComment
-
Google Says the FBI Is Secretly Spying on Some of Its Customers | Threat Level | Wired.com
The terrorists apparently would win if Google told you the exact number of times the Federal Bureau of Investigation invoked a secret process to extract data about the media giant’s customers.
That’s why it is unlawful for any record-keeper to disclose it has received a so-called National Security Letter. But under a deal brokered with the President Barack Obama administration, Google on Tuesday published a “range” of times it received National Security Letters demanding it divulge account information to the authorities without warrants.
It was the first time a company has ever released data chronicling the volume of National Security Letter requests.
National Security Letters allow the government to get detailed information on Americans’ finances and communications without oversight from a judge. The FBI has issued hundreds of thousands of NSLs and has even been reprimanded for abusing them. The NSLs are written demands from the FBI that compel internet service providers, credit companies, financial institutions and businesses like Google to hand over confidential records about their customers, such as subscriber information, phone numbers and e-mail addresses, websites visited and more as long as the FBI says the information is “relevant” to an investigation.
In each year from 2009 to 2012, Google said it received “0-999″ National Security Letters.
But in its talks with the authorities over releasing figures, Google said national security was on the mind of the Obama administration.
“You’ll notice that we’re reporting numerical ranges rather than exact numbers. This is to address concerns raised by the FBI, Justice Department and other agencies that releasing exact numbers might reveal information about investigations. We plan to update these figures annually,” Richard Salgado, a Google legal director, wrote in a blog post.
Salgado was not available for comment.
What makes the government’s position questionable is that it is required by Congress to disclose the number of times the bureau issues National Security Letters. In 2011, the year with the latest available figures, the FBI issued 16,511 National Security Letters pertaining to 7,201 different persons. (.pdf)
Google said the number of accounts connected to National Security letters ranged between “1000-1999″ for each of the reported years other than 2010. In that year, the range was “2000-2999.”
Google noted that the FBI may “obtain ‘the name, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records’ of a subscriber to a wire or electronic communications service. The FBI can’t use NSLs to obtain anything else from Google, such as Gmail content, search queries, YouTube videos or user IP addresses.”
Google often must disclose that data via other means, as described here.
Under the Patriot Act, Google or others who receive a NSL must disclose the sought-after information if the authorities say the request is “relevant to an authorized investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.”
National Security Letters are a powerful tool because they do not require court approval, and they come with a built-in gag order, preventing recipients from disclosing to anyone that they have even received an NSL. An FBI agent looking into a possible anti-terrorism case can self-issue an NSL to a credit bureau, ISP or phone company with only the sign-off of the special agent in charge of their office.
What’s more, the lack of court oversight raises the possibility for extensive abuse.
In 2007 a Justice Department Inspector General audit found that the FBI had indeed abused its authority and misused NSLs on many occasions. After 9/11, for example, the FBI paid multimillion-dollar contracts to AT&T and Verizon requiring the companies to station employees inside the FBI and to give these employees access to the telecom databases so they could immediately service FBI requests for telephone records. The IG found that the employees let FBI agents illegally look at customer records without paperwork and even wrote NSLs for the FBI.
That said, we should applaud Google for trying to be transparent on the issue, regardless of the Obama administration’s preposterous national-security concerns.Comment
-
this.................^ too polite mature. just like you said B too much joking clowning makes for a negative vibe on the board. went back on march 1 affects my attitude sometimes maybe me my bad redOriginally posted by redback View PostComment
Comment