Does this friday's cover of Rolling Stone piss anyone else off?

[Lmg2701]

I think this is pretty distasteful to say the very least.

[FitnessBrat]

Of all the heroes in this country, we think we need to glorify this? Bad decision, Rolling Stone.

[blm]

It's typical tabloid filth. Plaster the faces of criminals and not the victims while indirectly glorifying them. While no one knows what those that suffered, perished or acted with heroism looks like.

[BEAST]

Why? When bombing happened him and his brother was on the cover of every magazine, newspaper and every tv station. Why wasn't a problem back then and it ia now?
I'd have a problem if they were appraising what he did but there is nothing indicates that from what I see.

[lipripper]

YES..its fucked up IMO...VERY FUCKED UP!!!!

[blm]

Why? When bombing happened him and his brother was on the cover of every magazine, newspaper and every tv station. Why wasn't a problem back then and it ia now?
I'd have a problem if they were appraising what he did but there is nothing indicates that from what I see.

True. However it has always been known as a privilege and an honor to grace the cover of RS. The same cannot be said for your standard media tabloid.

[Turbo3000]

Looks like they want him to be Jim Morrison
Weird fucking cover for sure.

[funniirishman]

Why? When bombing happened him and his brother was on the cover of every magazine, newspaper and every tv station. Why wasn't a problem back then and it ia now?
I'd have a problem if they were appraising what he did but there is nothing indicates that from what I see.

I think the issue is primarily that its a glamour shopped picture of him, much like they did with Jim Morrison or countless other artists they were praising and paying tribute to. I thinks its completely ridiculous, and in incredibly poor taste. When we start putting these fucking retard terrorist on the cover of magazines instead of six feet under the ground, its a dismal sign of how degraded our country has become IMO.