Ladies and gentleman... I give you... Ohio...

[Bouncer]

If evidence can't disprove it neither can it prove it

Perfect head in the sand way to see things in order to blindly follow nonsense.

Science cannot disprove purple flying pigs with cocks for eyeballs either..

[Bouncer]

No u missed it. Fact is we know things work because they do. In most if not all cases where not sure why. Lol in the old days according to u when we couldn't explain something we said god did. We'll nothing has changed . Only know we say well we think this is why. So it's fact. We'll actually it's not . For instance Big Bang . Huge flash of light passes and everything on our solar system is created. Or was it when god said let there be light. The whole BBT sounds like it proves a Devine power. But it's not cool to believe that. What would my friends think of me?

In the "old days" it was believed that thunder was the gods fighting. We now know better. So yes, things have certainly changed. Well... maybe not in the mindless cesspool that is the south..

[TKD]

No u missed it. Fact is we know things work because they do. In most if not all cases where not sure why. Lol in the old days according to u when we couldn't explain something we said god did. We'll nothing has changed . Only know we say well we think this is why. So it's fact. We'll actually it's not . For instance Big Bang . Huge flash of light passes and everything on our solar system is created. Or was it when god said let there be light. The whole BBT sounds like it proves a Devine power. But it's not cool to believe that. What would my friends think of me?

That's the problem with your thinking right there. It is NOT stated as Fact. It is the working theory based off the facts and evidence available to us.

Again, science does not discuss religion. It's religion that discusses science. Faith is a personal choice, if the facts and evidence conflict with that it is a personal problem.

Unless you are willing to do the work yourself, you have to trust the scientist who have everything vetted. Just dismissing it because it doesn't agree with some archaic book, brought about by people with an elementary level education, only hinders the progression of man kind.

[Bouncer]

Ladies and Gents... I give you the south.. ^^^^^

[Bouncer]

If u had seen what I've seen. Crippled men stand and walk. stage 4 cancer disappear. HIV disappear all in Jesus name. You'd stop worrying about science . Seriously

When you look in the mirror do you ever wonder what you did to be punished in the way that you are? :thankyou:

[TKD]

If u had seen what I've seen. Crippled men stand and walk. stage 4 cancer disappear. HIV disappear all in Jesus name. You'd stop worrying about science . Seriously

If true, were they without any medical intervention ever? And that is called an anomaly not jesus. You sure struggle with this vocabulary thing.

I would love to be there with you when you walk through a children's hospital oncology or burn unit. Telling them to stop wasting their time with the doctors and come to church with you instead. There is a kind and just spirit there that can heal you. It's not his fault you are like this. Sure he could have saved you and/or prevented this in the first place, but you haven't squinted your eyes hard enough yet. :rofl:

[Bouncer]

How long have you been on AAS? Years and years right? Shouldn't god reward you with actually looking like you workout? Maybe you will look like something in the afterlife!

[blm]

If u had seen what I've seen. Crippled men stand and walk. stage 4 cancer disappear. HIV disappear all in Jesus name. You'd stop worrying about science . Seriously

I really wish there was some legitimacy to this, I really do. My aunt passed just a few months ago from stage 4 cancer and never wavered in her faith up to the very end. Nor did the rest of the family that hold strong Christian values. She was an amazing woman who worked 5 days a week part time at a local flower shop only as a means to donate 100% of her wages to various local charities. They held prayer circles to "pray the cancer" away and always beleived in their hearts that a miracle would happen in Jesus' name.

Unfortuately, all the praying, chemo, and radiation couldn't beat the demon of cancer.

Oddly, that part of the family still hold to their beliefs but now its "well if thats the way God willed it thatn that is how its meant to be" and "he obviously needed a special angel to carry out his plans" etc....

I laugh with a heavy heart and say nothing because I am not going to shit on their grieving process. :noo:

[Bouncer]

See now your being a dumb ass. I never said don't go to drs. Told u what I've seen over and over. Not everybody gets healed. I can't say why. But I do know we can't live forever.

No your right... Its HIM being a dumb ass.... Bwahahaha

[Mr I]

brainwashed police state with a community of zombies cometh

George Orwell

[Bouncer]

Scientific Evidence of God
By Bob Dutko

While Intelligent Design skeptics may claim there is no evidence of God, the actual scientific evidence for God's existence is overwhelming, scientifically answering the question, "does God exist?".

In science there is a Law of Physics called the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. Within it is a Conservation of Energy Law that states, as a key principle that all energy in a closed system must be conserved. Okay, fancy language, but what does that mean? It means that while energy can convert into matter (physical "stuff"), and matter into energy, however much total "stuff" there is (matter and energy), there can never be an increase in that total amount or a decrease in that total amount. So however much total "stuff" there is in the universe, (matter and energy combined), there can never have been more and never have been less. All it can do is convert to different forms, like matter to energy or energy to matter, but the total amount of all of it has to remain the same.

The "closed system" is a scientific term that refers to a system or an "area" that has no outside influence, like the universe. Now, as believers we know, of course, that God does influence the universe, so many believers would consider the universe an "open system", (one that does get outside influence), but for the atheist who says there is no God, the universe is all there is, so from their perspective and for the sake of conventional science, the universe would get no outside influence and would therefore be considered a "closed system".

Back to the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. If it states that you can never have an increase or decrease of energy/matter, which means that matter/energy can not be created from nothingness, how did we get all the matter and energy in the universe? If science is all there is and there is no God, then the 1st Law of Thermodynamics reigns supreme and therefore it would be impossible to have matter and energy in existence right now. Simply put, when you open your eyes and see matter and experience energy, what you see is impossible according to the known Laws of science if, in fact, there is no God. Therefore, science itself says there must be a God.

Plain and simple, matter/energy can not come into existence. It is scientifically impossible, yet here we see everything around us, so how can that be? There are really only 3 possibilities. Option A: Everything came into existence by itself anyway, without the help of God, (even though science has proven that impossible). Option B: Everything in the universe has always existed for all of eternity, (which, by the way is also scientifically impossible as explained in the Top Ten Proofs for God's Existence CD due to something called the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics), or Option C: There must be a God, a Being greater than science, who created the Laws of science and has the ability to disobey them. Not only is a belief in God the only logical conclusion to draw, it's the only one scientifically possible because remember, if there is no God, the first two options are scientifically impossible according to the actual Laws of Physics.

Believe it or not, a 5 year old child could be an atheistic scientist's worst nightmare by merely asking him "where did everything come from if God didn't make it?" What that child is actually asking in scientific terms is "how do we have a violation of the 1st Law of Thermodynamics by the creation of energy and matter in the closed system of the universe if there is no Creator capable of doing that?"

Many times people who do not believe there is evidence of God have claimed that a faith in God is only a matter of faith and that it can not be proven scientifically. They say "does God exist ?....if so, prove it to me". When confronted with this, we must fully understand what it means to "prove" something. The fact is that none of us were there when the universe came into being, so technically, none of us can "prove" what happened. We can't "prove" God did it and the atheists can't "prove" everything came into being on it's own, so what we have to do is examine the evidence based on science to determine the most plausible explanation. For example, if I see a beautiful sand castle on the beach with intricate design, but no one there along with it, I can not "prove" someone made it, just as someone else can not "prove" the sand castle made itself from the wind, waves and sand randomly interacting with one another, so we have to determine what logic and reason tell us is the most plausible explanation, based on scientific evidence and examination. You can get over an hour of scientific, mathemetical and logical evidence for God in the <Top Ten Proofs for God's Existence.

This is just one simple example of scientific evidence for God's existence out of many that can help you defend the faith with evidence of God based on science and logic, not just faith.

Sucks when science bites you in the Ass

Holy Christ almighty... In the name of all that's sacred... You are the dumbest of all fucks that ever walked through valley of the shadows!!

[TKD]

Science says nothing about God. People do. And the article would be better served to say higher power not god.

[TKD]

Scientific Evidence of Flying Spaghetti Monster
By Bob Dutko

While Intelligent Design skeptics may claim there is no evidence of Flying Spaghetti Monster, the actual scientific evidence for Flying Spaghetti Monster's existence is overwhelming, scientifically answering the question, "does Flying Spaghetti Monster exist?".

In science there is a Law of Physics called the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. Within it is a Conservation of Energy Law that states, as a key principle that all energy in a closed system must be conserved. Okay, fancy language, but what does that mean? It means that while energy can convert into matter (physical “stuff”), and matter into energy, however much total “stuff” there is (matter and energy), there can never be an increase in that total amount or a decrease in that total amount. So however much total “stuff” there is in the universe, (matter and energy combined), there can never have been more and never have been less. All it can do is convert to different forms, like matter to energy or energy to matter, but the total amount of all of it has to remain the same.

The “closed system” is a scientific term that refers to a system or an “area” that has no outside influence, like the universe. Now, as believers we know, of course, that Flying Spaghetti Monster does influence the universe, so many believers would consider the universe an “open system”, (one that does get outside influence), but for the atheist who says there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster, the universe is all there is, so from their perspective and for the sake of conventional science, the universe would get no outside influence and would therefore be considered a “closed system”.

Back to the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. If it states that you can never have an increase or decrease of energy/matter, which means that matter/energy can not be created from nothingness, how did we get all the matter and energy in the universe? If science is all there is and there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster, then the 1st Law of Thermodynamics reigns supreme and therefore it would be impossible to have matter and energy in existence right now. Simply put, when you open your eyes and see matter and experience energy, what you see is impossible according to the known Laws of science if, in fact, there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster. Therefore, science itself says there must be a Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Plain and simple, matter/energy can not come into existence. It is scientifically impossible, yet here we see everything around us, so how can that be? There are really only 3 possibilities. Option A: Everything came into existence by itself anyway, without the help of Flying Spaghetti Monster, (even though science has proven that impossible). Option B: Everything in the universe has always existed for all of eternity, (which, by the way is also scientifically impossible as explained in the Top Ten Proofs for Flying Spaghetti Monster's Existence CD due to something called the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics), or Option C: There must be a Flying Spaghetti Monster, a Being greater than science, who created the Laws of science and has the ability to disobey them. Not only is a belief in Flying Spaghetti Monster the only logical conclusion to draw, it's the only one scientifically possible because remember, if there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster, the first two options are scientifically impossible according to the actual Laws of Physics.

Believe it or not, a 5 year old child could be an atheistic scientist's worst nightmare by merely asking him “where did everything come from if Flying Spaghetti Monster didn't make it?” What that child is actually asking in scientific terms is “how do we have a violation of the 1st Law of Thermodynamics by the creation of energy and matter in the closed system of the universe if there is no Creator capable of doing that?”

Many times people who do not believe there is evidence of Flying Spaghetti Monster have claimed that a faith in Flying Spaghetti Monster is only a matter of faith and that it can not be proven scientifically. They say "does Flying Spaghetti Monster exist ?....if so, prove it to me". When confronted with this, we must fully understand what it means to “prove” something. The fact is that none of us were there when the universe came into being, so technically, none of us can “prove” what happened. We can't “prove” Flying Spaghetti Monster did it and the atheists can't “prove” everything came into being on it's own, so what we have to do is examine the evidence based on science to determine the most plausible explanation. For example, if I see a beautiful sand castle on the beach with intricate design, but no one there along with it, I can not “prove” someone made it, just as someone else can not “prove” the sand castle made itself from the wind, waves and sand randomly interacting with one another, so we have to determine what logic and reason tell us is the most plausible explanation, based on scientific evidence and examination. You can get over an hour of scientific, mathemetical and logical evidence for Flying Spaghetti Monster in the <Top Ten Proofs for Flying Spaghetti Monster's Existence.

This is just one simple example of scientific evidence for Flying Spaghetti Monster's existence out of many that can help you defend the faith with evidence of Flying Spaghetti Monster based on science and logic, not just faith.

Sucks when science and the Flying Spaghetti Monster bites you in the Ass