Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls

    Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant deadly Scam
    Secrets of the Fed
    Secretsofthefed.com
    January 6th, 2014


    Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”.

    The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:

    “Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.

    Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.

    The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation.

    Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ’Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.’”

    Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”

    UPDATE #1: Since coming forward with the truth about the devastating consequences of the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper has been victim of a relentless campaign attempting to discredit the validity of her claims.

    Harper was even misquoted by British tabloid The Sunday Express which printed a false story loaded with fabricated quotations attributed to Harper. In an interview with The Guardian, Harper makes it very clear about what exactly she said in order to protect herself from a potential lawsuit. In an interview with CBS NEWS, Harper clarifies her position, and once again makes it crystal clear just how devastating this vaccine can be: “If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn’t last … we’ve put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit,” says Dr. Harper.

    The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.” She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent. Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.

    “The risks of serious adverse events including death reported after Gardasil use in (the JAMA article by CDC’s Dr. Barbara Slade) were 3.4/100,000 doses distributed,” Harper tells CBS NEWS.
    ”The rate of serious adverse events on par with the death rate of cervical cancer.

    Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year.

    Indeed, the risks of vaccination are underreported in Slade’s article, as they are based on a denominator of doses distributed from Merck’s warehouse. Up to a third of those doses may be in refrigerators waiting to be dispensed as the autumn onslaught of vaccine messages is sent home to parents the first day of school. Should the denominator in Dr. Slade’s work be adjusted to account for this, and then divided by three for the number of women who would receive all three doses, the incidence rate of serious adverse events increases up to five fold. How does a parent value that information,” said Harper.

    “Parents and women must know that deaths occurred,” Harper tells CBS NEWS. “Not all deaths that have been reported were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil.” She also worries that Merck’s aggressive marketing of the vaccine may have given women a false sense of security. “The future expectations women hold because they have received free doses of Gardasil purchased by philanthropic foundations, by public health agencies or covered by insurance is the true threat to cervical cancer in the future. Should women stop Pap screening after vaccination, the cervical cancer rate will actually increase per year. Should women believe this is preventive for all cancers — something never stated, but often inferred by many in the population — a reduction in all health care will compound our current health crisis. Should Gardasil not be effective for more than 15 years, the most costly public health experiment in cancer control will have failed miserably.” Harper notes that her concern for the vaccine’s deadly side effects applies only to women in the Western world. ”Of course, in developing countries where there is no safety Pap screening for women repeatedly over their lifetimes, the risks of serious adverse events may be acceptable as the incidence rate of cervical cancer is five to 12 times higher than in the US, dwarfing the risk of death reported after Gardasil.”

    UPDATE #2: The National Vaccine Information Center HAS CONFIRMED two virologists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski have filed a lawsuit against their former employer and vaccine manufacturer Merck. NVIC writes: “The lawsuit alleges that Merck defrauded the U.S. for over 10 years by overstating the MMR vaccine’s effectivenes. The virologists claim in their lawsuit that they ‘Witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falseification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings.” NVIC president and co-founder, Barbara Loe Fisher, warns of the disturbingly cozy relationship and overwhelming conflict of interest between federal agencies charged with vaccine safety oversight (such as the Centers for Disease Control) and vaccine manufacturers. Merck’s global vaccine sales total more than $20 BILLION A YEAR.

    As the world’s pharmaceutical giants continue to be driven less by moral accountability and more by profit and shareholder-driven bottom lines, we are going to see more and more products such as this vaccine which are marketed as “essential to one’s survival.” While some vaccines are indeed essential, such as vaccines for polio and measles, the HPV vaccine is a new beast entirely. To learn more about how pharmaceutical giants are putting profits ahead of ethics you need to watch FRONTLINE’s terrifying new documentary “Hunting The Nightmare Bacteria.”

    Gardasil Victim Speaks Out After 2 Years - YouTube
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Just in case you missed it on who Dr Harper is..........

    Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™

    &

    Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer,



    Or she just ANOTHER QUACK that doesnt know what she's talking about.And yes,NOW THAT SHES SPOKEN OUT AGAINST VACCINES?

    Comment


    • #3



      OK... let's dig into this a bit, shall we?

      At the 4th International Conference on Vaccination, Dr. Harper made the following quote:

      "About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer."

      That doesn't sound like she is saying HPV vaccine won't help, does it? The antivaxxers of course can twist this to make it sound like anythign they want.

      All the details on what she said and didn't say at the conference, as well as very well thought out analysis by an actual thinking person, can be read here by anyone bothered to follow the truth, not made up hysteria:

      Gardasil researcher is against the vaccine

      Now, let's move on to the other nonsense that is in the original article above. As far as the Guardian article that is quoted is concerned, Dr. Harper never said anything of the cost benefit analysis in the way reported.

      In her own words:

      "I did not say that Cervarix was as deadly as cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix could be riskier or more deadly than cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix was controversial, I stated that Cervarix is not a 'controversial drug'. I did not 'hit out' – I was contacted by the press for facts. And this was not an exclusive interview."



      Her view is that we don't know how long the HPV vaccine will last, so we don't know the cost benefit analysis. Not cost as in risk, but cost as in dollars. But she is not saying the vaccine won't help, just that we don't know its cost effectiveness if the effects wear off too fast. In other words, if the makers are guilty of anything, it is that they may be not fully open about how much the treatment can cost, not that it doesn't work or is dangerous.

      FIST, you have an agenda against vaccines, but you need to do your homework.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post



        OK... let's dig into this a bit, shall we?

        At the 4th International Conference on Vaccination, Dr. Harper made the following quote:

        "About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer."

        That doesn't sound like she is saying HPV vaccine won't help, does it? The antivaxxers of course can twist this to make it sound like anythign they want.

        All the details on what she said and didn't say at the conference, as well as very well thought out analysis by an actual thinking person, can be read here by anyone bothered to follow the truth, not made up hysteria:

        Gardasil researcher is against the vaccine

        Now, let's move on to the other nonsense that is in the original article above. As far as the Guardian article that is quoted is concerned, Dr. Harper never said anything of the cost benefit analysis in the way reported.

        In her own words:

        "I did not say that Cervarix was as deadly as cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix could be riskier or more deadly than cervical cancer. I did not say that Cervarix was controversial, I stated that Cervarix is not a 'controversial drug'. I did not 'hit out' – I was contacted by the press for facts. And this was not an exclusive interview."



        Her view is that we don't know how long the HPV vaccine will last, so we don't know the cost benefit analysis. Not cost as in risk, but cost as in dollars. But she is not saying the vaccine won't help, just that we don't know its cost effectiveness if the effects wear off too fast. In other words, if the makers are guilty of anything, it is that they may be not fully open about how much the treatment can cost, not that it doesn't work or is dangerous.

        FIST, you have an agenda against vaccines, but you need to do your homework.
        I absolutely have an agenda against vaccines as should everyone knowing the truth to their dangers.

        Actually its you who need to do your homework my friend.Here's the link to the original CBS interview with her with her own words,not those that you are choosing to quote and take out of context.......

        Gardasil Researcher Speaks Out - CBS News


        If you read the actual interview you will read the same things I highlighted above in my original post.

        Comment


        • #5
          Now aside from all the statements from those who are called quacks by those with vested interests in them being considered such,what still amazes me is number one...how many millions of dollars are STILL being awarded to hundreds of people based ,I guess on these "so called" quacks research,and number 2...the other thing that puzzles me is how many people who have actually been harmed by these things are speaking up.Im sure we can all agree that they're all not nuts right??

          The actual people who have been harmed by these poisons and how they have been helped by the same so called quacks while traditional medicines,treatments and thinking failed them miserably.

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, if you have an agenda against vaccines, you should go find a suitable forum to spout your invective. This is not an anti vaccine forum. This is a fitness site dedicated to exercise, nutrition and similar topics. Yes, the occasional health topic is fine but conspiracy theories are ridiculous and seriously detract from the quality of the board.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by F.I.S.T. View Post
              I absolutely have an agenda against vaccines as should everyone knowing the truth to their dangers.

              Actually its you who need to do your homework my friend.Here's the link to the original CBS interview with her with her own words,not those that you are choosing to quote and take out of context.......

              Gardasil Researcher Speaks Out - CBS News


              If you read the actual interview you will read the same things I highlighted above in my original post.
              Total BS.

              snopes.com: Urgent Warning About Gardasil

              A 2009 CBS News interview with Dr. Harper is often cited as contradicting this assessment, but it does not: Dr. Harper did not state during that interview that Gardasil doesn't work, is dangerous, or wasn't tested. Given questions about how long the vaccine is effective for, she questioned the efficacy of giving shots to girls as young as 11 years old in parts of the world (such as the U.S.) where women regularly undergo safety Pap screening repeatedly over their lifetimes, saying that the chances of their contracting cervical cancer may be less than the "small" risks associated with the vaccine. But Dr. Harper also noted that the risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil were "very rare," and that she "agrees with Merck and the CDC that Gardasil is safe for most girls and women."

              In other words, the HPV vaccine works. Nothing she said contradicts the overall point that the vaccine is safe and will protect against HPV.

              Comment


              • #8
                And let me add that Dr. Harper is not the "lead developer" of the vaccine. She is in the management chain at the vaccine maker. Not that it matters, but I love how the antivaxxers decide to make things up to sound like the person who developed the vaccine is against it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Snopes???? Talk about total BS!!

                  The link I posted is from THE ACTUAL CBS INTERVIEW????

                  Again,what you're quoting in selecting what you want others to read,just as all those with vested interests do and leave out the rest of the article.

                  So she said its safe for most girls,but she also said THERE ARE DEATHS THAT ARE AT LEAST AS GREAT IN NUMBER THAT ARE CAUSED BY CERVICAL CANCER.Don't leave out that part.


                  Go read the ENTIRE INTERVIEW POSTED ON CBS' WEBSITE.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
                    Well, if you have an agenda against vaccines, you should go find a suitable forum to spout your invective. This is not an anti vaccine forum. This is a fitness site dedicated to exercise, nutrition and similar topics. Yes, the occasional health topic is fine but conspiracy theories are ridiculous and seriously detract from the quality of the board.


                    Then why are there NON EXERCISE,NUTRITION AND SIMILAR TOPIC forums??


                    There should only be those forums you stated then correct? What you're actually saying its a forum where you post only what you or someone else believe no matter how much evidence there is to prove you wrong?


                    Post what we like or don't post at all?? Im not bashing anyone,nor have I since ive been here unless it was in rebuttal to the attacks on me so why not follow your own advice and check ignore user so you don't have to read my posts? If you're so against you seem to be following them religiously.Nothing wrong with that on my end and I actually appreciate the feedback and the discussion.Unlike you it would appear.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by F.I.S.T. View Post
                      Now aside from all the statements from those who are called quacks by those with vested interests in them being considered such,what still amazes me is number one...how many millions of dollars are STILL being awarded to hundreds of people based ,I guess on these "so called" quacks research,and number 2...the other thing that puzzles me is how many people who have actually been harmed by these things are speaking up.Im sure we can all agree that they're all not nuts right??

                      The actual people who have been harmed by these poisons and how they have been helped by the same so called quacks while traditional medicines,treatments and thinking failed them miserably.

                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^I digress again to this^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The actual CBS interview is what is listed there as well. I read the interview.

                        What she says is:

                        1. There is a small risk for the vaccine.
                        2. The cost (dollars) to benefit ratio is something that needs to be evaluated if the vaccine efficacy is not long enough.
                        3. In countries where regular checks (pap smears, etc.) are common, there may be a safety net to catch any potential issues. However, in developing countries where this does not exist, there is a much much higher risk of HPV.
                        4. Overall, the vaccine is safe.

                        What's there to not understand? Stop being hysterical. Your antivax propaganda is getting tiresome.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Just in case you missed it,here's the ACTUAL INTERVIEW AGAIN.............


                          Gardasil Researcher Speaks Out - CBS News

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yeah, I read it. Nothing new there that has not been said already.

                            By the way, here is an admission by CBS on their HPV story being not balanced. In other words, they decided to spin the anti-vax angle for ratings. Nothing like a little fear mongering to get the ratings up, eh? Shame...

                            Katie Couric admits disproportionate reporting on HPV vaccine controversy - CBS News

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              And here is a dispassionate analysis by Orac on Dr. Harper and Gardasil.

                              Yet another antivaccine meme rises from the grave again: No, Diane Harper doesn’t hate Gardasil – Respectful Insolence

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X