History proves vaccines are quite safe - really?

[F.I.S.T.]

History proves vaccines are quite safe - really?
Jon Rappaport
nomorefakenews.com
Mon, 29 Sep 2014


In 1987, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I decided to look into vaccines as a cause of immune-system suppression.

I had never dug below the surface of that subject before.

Of course, the authorities and experts have been forever telling people how effective and safe vaccines are. They issue their remarks with great assurance.

Here are just a few of my findings, from 1987. They paint a different historical record.

"Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination)." W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.

"... Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP [diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis vaccine], that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored." Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217

"Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children." Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company, Ltd., p. 58.

"... the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths." U.S. News and World Report , Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, "How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases."

"At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal." Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967.

"Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years." Hazards of Immunization, Wilson.

"So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States. It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases (of polio) which were caused directly or indirectly by the (polio) vaccination constitute minimum figures... It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 (polio) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine. A careful study of the epidemiologic course of polio in the United States yields indications of grave significance. In numerous states of the U.S.A., typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955... The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 cannot be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm." Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980, vol. 19, no. 4, Story of the Salk Vaccine (Part 2).
"Suffice it to say that most of the large (polio) epidemics that have occurred in this country since the introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset.

To name a few, there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955; the Chicago epidemic of 1956; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959." Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980 vol. 19, no. 4.

"Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility." JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with "an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache... and a diverse rash (which)... may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules... "

"Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded... figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America's children every year." DPT: A Shot in the Dark by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Yes, a different history. Is there a school anywhere which would dare teach it?

Comment: Additional articles on

the flawed theory behind vaccinations:


Why vaccines spread disease and vaccine science is flawed
Polish study: No historical benefit in vaccines
Why Infants Need Natural Immunity: How Vaccines Actually Promote Cancer
Growth
Study links vaccine induced immune overload to autism, diabetes, obesity
New research shows that vaccines cause an epidemic of chronic inflammation

[Scrumhalf]

Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and only absolutely crazy conspiracy theorists would avoid them. Vaccines and antibiotics are the two things that have almost doubled the life expectancy in even an advanced country like the US in a little over a century. Their importance in developing countries without access to clean water, etc. cannot be overstated.

[F.I.S.T.]

Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and only absolutely crazy conspiracy theorists would avoid them. Vaccines and antibiotics are the two things that have almost doubled the life expectancy in even an advanced country like the US in a little over a century. Their importance in developing countries without access to clean water, etc. cannot be overstated.

Well I have to say that I disagree with 100%.

I only refer to the millions of people dying each year directly related to their utilization and the millions of $$ being awarded to the victims from them.

I would also refer to the multitude of research papers and actual EXPERTS in the field now speaking up and against them.Unless they're all quacks all of a sudden.LOL

My last reference will be to the millions of $$ in payoffs to dr's to push this crap on everyone in the form of cash,vacations,paid trips and flights,etc.

[Scrumhalf]

There are not millions of people dying directly due to vaccines.

What research papers are you referring to? Cranking out a Bubba's Health News newsletter on a laser printer in your basement does not count.

Show me research papers in quality peer reviewed journals that have stood up to scrutiny and can be reproduced, which show that millions of people are dying of vaccines every year. This is the basis of scientific inquiry, where your results can be reproduced by others. That's what separates legitimate research from quackery.

So, show me. Where are these studies in quality journals?

[F.I.S.T.]

There are not millions of people dying directly due to vaccines.

What research papers are you referring to? Cranking out a Bubba's Health News newsletter on a laser printer in your basement does not count.

Show me research papers in quality peer reviewed journals that have stood up to scrutiny and can be reproduced, which show that millions of people are dying of vaccines every year. This is the basis of scientific inquiry, where your results can be reproduced by others. That's what separates legitimate research from quackery.

So, show me. Where are these studies in quality journals?

I didnt say millions are dying,I said millions are being HARMED and /or DYING each year.

The research is already posted.By those that are and were the TOP MINDS IN THE INDUSTRY.I know,I know,they're all quacks now that they told the truth on just how bad these poisons are for you but before that they were the GO TO PEOPLE!!

BEFORE THEY STARTED HURTING THE $$ TRAIN.LOL

[Scrumhalf]

[SIZE="3"]I didnt say millions are dying,I said millions are being HARMED and /or DYING each year.

I quote you directly from Post 3 in this thread:

"I only refer to the millions of people dying each year directly related to their utilization..."

Once again, point me to peer-reviewed research showing what you are claiming. Any crank can claim anything. I can also claim on the internet that I have disproved Einstein's theory of relativity. But until I can show my proof to other physicists and publish my results in a physics journal, I will rightly be called a crank. This is how science works. And we are all the better for it.

[F.I.S.T.]

I quote you directly from Post 3 in this thread:

"I only refer to the millions of people dying each year directly related to their utilization..."

Once again, point me to peer-reviewed research showing what you are claiming. Any crank can claim anything. I can also claim on the internet that I have disproved Einstein's theory of relativity. But until I can show my proof to other physicists and publish my results in a physics journal, I will rightly be called a crank. This is how science works. And we are all the better for it.

Once again,I need only point everyone to the LEADERS IN THE INDUSTRY COMING CLEAN AND THE MILLIONS BEING AWARDED TO THE VICTIMS OF THESE POISONS??

As I asked before,do you think that the gov't and big phaarm did not have the research you clain exist proving these poisons to be safe?? Did they not have the others experts on their side to prove their cases??? The courts are just awarding AGAINST THE GOV'T and AGAINST BIG PHARM based on FLAWED DATA???

Come on Scrum.ADMIT IT BRO.I promise I wont tell your peers you said it.It between you an me.Trust me,you'll feel so much better just getting it off your chest.

[Scrumhalf]

LEADERS IN THE INDUSTRY COMING CLEAN AND THE MILLIONS BEING AWARDED TO THE VICTIMS OF THESE POISONS??

You keep saying this over and over. What are you talking about? If you are talking about a systemic conspiracy in the pharmaceutical industry that calls into question the entire worldwide procedure of drug testing prior to release to the market, then you are completely bananas. Show me proof. Who are these "industry leaders" who are coming clean?

[F.I.S.T.]

You keep saying this over and over. What are you talking about? If you are talking about a systemic conspiracy in the pharmaceutical industry that calls into question the entire worldwide procedure of drug testing prior to release to the market, then you are completely bananas. Show me proof. Who are these "industry leaders" who are coming clean?

Sure,check out every article I posted from these industry leaders.

[Scrumhalf]

Again, I've said it so many times, my fingers are hurting from typing. I want published papers showing the problems you are highlighting. Peer review is separates the researchers from the pretenders. You can follow the pretenders if you want, but I need something more tangible than that.

You are making the outrageous claims, you must shoulder the burden of proof, not me.

[F.I.S.T.]

Again, I've said it so many times, my fingers are hurting from typing. I want published papers showing the problems you are highlighting. Peer review is separates the researchers from the pretenders. You can follow the pretenders if you want, but I need something more tangible than that.

You are making the outrageous claims, you must shoulder the burden of proof, not me.

You dont have to continue to type.All you have to do is click on every single post ive made on this and you'll find your proof if read.

[TKD]

Again, I've said it so many times, my fingers are hurting from typing. I want published papers showing the problems you are highlighting. Peer review is separates the researchers from the pretenders. You can follow the pretenders if you want, but I need something more tangible than that.

You are making the outrageous claims, you must shoulder the burden of proof, not me.

Scrum, find a peer review for vaccines. Post it here, let him read it and lets see if he can create a coherent opinion.