A question of tolerance

[Mr I]

You want a tolerant and none prejudice society, respecting others beliefs.

How do you maintain this if one group or religion seeks to dominate, without being prejudice

[Bouncer]

Thus the reason religion has and always will be at war.

Hitler had the right idea but the wrong target.

If we eradicate religion and force enlighten it will only be a few generations before we are in a much better place.

The only way it could work is to be brutal and swift. Start with the baby boomer generation. These cunts still have 15-20 years to live and they are some of the dumbest and most ignorant fucks of all time. Sorry mom, I love ya but you need to go.. it's for the greater good.

Religion of any kind will be erased in Bouncer the Impaler's kingdom. Absolute hate and disgust towards religion will be taught an enforced. It will be the first aggressive enlightenment culture in history. Science has always gone hand and hand with a peaceful culture. This does not work. We need to match fire with fire if we are to defeat the parasitic religious filth of the world.

My reign would be seen by most as the worlds most horrific dictatorship the world has ever seen. But the fruits of my labor would be enjoyed by a more educated and enlightened world in the generations to come. Much like the SS of Nazi Germany, I would have the NE... Necessary Evil.

[Bouncer]

Of course the error in my plan is human nature. When you tell a kid not to press the red button on the wall he will do just that. There would always be religious resistance fighters. It would depend on how efficient and brutal my NE squad was in rooting the filth out. Then we come full circle and it resembles a North Korea based society and they aren't exactly "enlightened".

In closing, as it stands now, there is no answer. :cheese:

[Mr I]

Agree,

Funny, Castro had the same idea, Cuba is probably the safest latin American or Carribean country by far.

The point is look at the UK, we are probably the most tolerant along with modern Germany who are morally bankrupt and consistently reminded so after WWII.

We are so tolerant that it makes us weak. Ultimately some justified prejudice will have to come. Tribes naturally want to dominate through survivalist nature. Keeping balance is like playing that bop a frog game at the arcades

[Bouncer]

Exactly. The balance between tolerance and being steam rolled is incredibly hard.

Ancient Alexandria was one of the most tolerant places on earth for a good many years. They got so tolerant in fact that they allowed themselves to be burned to the ground and we lost irreplaceable information that was stored in the library of Alexandria. If only it had been protected by my NE squad. :cheese:

[Mr I]

Was that Russia?

[Bouncer]

Was that Russia?

Was what Russia?

If you're referring to who burned Alexandria.. The Muslim conquest of Egypt is responsible.

Surprise surprise... Muslims. Fucken beast and his kind.. :cheese:

[Bouncer]

I want to point out something here for anyone who questions why I keep Mr.I around.

It's because he gets thought provoking conversations going. Even if 90% of the time he is posting trollish dribble.. he is still valuable to the forum.

Too many people are afraid or simply shy away from any sort of controversy or confrontation. That's fine but you gotta realize that leads to incredibly boring and uninspiring conversation.

I like the fella even if he is a vomit inducing scab of a human.

[Mr I]

You do talk poo at times and you propagate false identities of people. The problem is that the weak minded follow you, people take the line of least resistance, feel safer of opinion in numbers and you don't reward loyalty hence why few of the original members remain in anything but ghost like form. This is the reflection of how well the board is managed, the true quality and diversities and activity on this board took a shit when you couldn't handle Rado some time ago. It lost its diversity and other personalities got drowned out by him. He's a cool guy now but the point is the board never regained it's soul. I will never run people down in less they are overt aggressors or snipers of negative intention.

Your statement above for example omits the colossal contribution I have made in helping people (some vulnerable ) with cycling and such and guiding them in safe direction.

I may troll at times in the wider sense but I don't originate nasty traps.

My weakness is feeling the need to put down the bullies

I am the real deal and I do as I say in life.

[Bouncer]

Good talk. And your right. I'm not loyal to anyone just for the sake of being loyal. I will defend my enemies and attack my friends if the situation calls for it.

[Mr I]

Cool cool and in keeping it real, I will say this, you are what you say you are and neither if us hide

[chuckz28]

I'm going to inject confrontation here. I'm atheist, however I cannot stand intolerance of human rights or genetic traits. If someone wants to believe something then they should have the right to be a fool as long as nobody pushes their religion or anti religion on others. There needs to be stiffer consequences for those that use force against other humans because of their beliefs, but living on this planet isn't a conditional circumstance. Individual freedom is a basic human right. Who the hell am I to impose my will on another human being? This constant belief that we as people must push what we THINK is right is the reason we are all still apes. If everybody left each other alone we would be fine. I''m honestly shocked and disgusted hearing this extremist standpoint about what you two think should be done for the advancement of the human race.

[Mr I]

^ I'm not quite sure we understand each other here. We may be at cross purposes / different sides of the same page. I agree the principles of what you are saying in an ideal world and what I think both B and I are saying is that the problem with this concept is that it only works if everyone follows it. The problem is others don't and often in the form of a group they oppress you eventually if you don't take a stand. I'll give you an example hold up
.

[Mr I]

The BBC and Islam: Let the children be raped - The Commentator

Recently in Blighty it has come to light that in one quiet northern council where much of the community are Pakistanni muslim they were grooming underage white girls. These fucks who came or who's parents or grand parents came here targeted not their own creed but the white indigenous one and worked as a group (Pakistan men). When girls complained the police and Council were weak and so afraid of being labelled racist because our country is now set up to favour ethnic minorities in any argument, that tens if not hundreds of girls were raped.

The UK is one of the most tolerant countries you will find and this is where it's got us... Watch "Rotherham Rape Scandal Destroys 'White Privilege" Myth" on YouTube
Rotherham Rape Scandal Destroys 'White Privilege" Myth: http://youtu.be/75aLYqRFq9I

[henry]

You do talk poo at times and you propagate false identities of people. The problem is that the weak minded follow you, people take the line of least resistance, feel safer of opinion in numbers and you don't reward loyalty hence why few of the original members remain in anything but ghost like form. This is the reflection of how well the board is managed, the true quality and diversities and activity on this board took a shit when you couldn't handle Rado some time ago. It lost its diversity and other personalities got drowned out by him. He's a cool guy now but the point is the board never regained it's soul. I will never run people down in less they are overt aggressors or snipers of negative intention.=.

why does everyone hate on poor rado?:gaydo: