UK terrorist attack

[chuckz28]

Manchester Arena blast: 19 dead and about 50 hurt - BBC News

Too bad Mr. I died from a terrorist attack at the Ariana Grande concert. Srsly though this is pretty messed up.

[Bouncer]

Mother fuckers

[Mr I]

That's really sad. I feel for the victims and their families.

[boricuarage79]

This is very Sad.. prayers go out to the victims and there families.
This shit is never going to end

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Bouncer]

"Religion"...

[Bouncer]

Scrum will chime in soon with some sort of justification.

Before you do scrum let me just point out that it is not US or UK civilians that are killing and occupying Muslim majority countries, it is our government. Yet these Muslim extremist attack civilians calling it a holy war as justification. Fuck that. The argument is flawed and someone as smart as you should be able to smell the bullshit from 10,000 miles away...

Their beef should be with our governments, not civilians with children at a concert to inflict maximum damage. There is no justification.

It's like you kicking me in the nuts so in return I say "god is great" and I go slap your mother. Wtf has she got to do with you kicking me in the nuts? That's the same bullshit argument you always try to use to justify these extremist acts. "Oh well if our government would leave their countries alone"... What has that got to do with civilians? It's not our civilians who are killing their civilians...

I have all the respect in the world for you but I feel you are completely blind on this subject. I'm aware of what our governments have done to their countries. Its very sad. But to strike back at our civilians in "the name of God" is the biggest pile of shit argument I've ever heard.

[chuckz28]

There has yet to be any form of violent extremist Hindu or Buddhist etc intentionally killing civilians. And I know Christianity has had it's past and still has some crazies but I still don't see Christian's suicide bombing civilians. This keeps coming down to one form and their own community is doing very little to stop it.

[boricuarage79]

How can we define terrorism.. black sheep's would define terrorism as an Islamic act for jihad?... they attack civilians to make a statement for the government... cowards do this.. they can't get close to the government, but they can get close to civilians. Shit can happen in any giving minute. CIA, homeland and other agencies can prevent these cell attacks, but then what news would we have.. it's a fucked up world we live in, But the fact the matter is, it's reality...
Remember Waco Texas and the siege in the church bunch of colts.. what would we define that? Terrorism? Then fuckers brought tanks in for the kill

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[chuckz28]

If they wanted to go against government they would attack police stations and government buildings. Every one of the 911 planes would have attacked Washington if that's what they really wanted. You don't kill people you don't hate plain and simple. They hate Western laws that don't conform to Sharia and the people that chose not to on their own.

Waco was straight up crazies vs cops and was stopped right there.

[lipripper]

Kill all those fuckers....

B your right..scrum will justify it..

like wanted the elephant hunter killed because he hunted animials

but don't kill a rapist or a murderer .. as capital punishment is not civilized...we have to rehabilitate them so they understand... so kill rape people..OK..kill an animal//your evil really? how fucked up is that...:rofl:

[Scrumhalf]

Wow. Name a SINGLE instance where I said violence against civilians is acceptable. A single one.

And pointing out the irony of the hunter's death by the elephant is equivalent to being an apologist for violence against children?

You guys owe me an apology.

[lipripper]

whys the elephant thread edited? funny... your entitled to what you believe...you just come off so far left sometimes I don't think you realize your even doing it scrum.

[Scrumhalf]

Again, listen to what I said. Name a SINGLE instance where I said violence against civilians is justified. Show me. My entire posting history on SM is available to all of you.

If anything, I have been scrupulously consistent on this. On both sides.

[lipripper]

Again, listen to what I said. Name a SINGLE instance where I said violence against civilians is justified. Show me. My entire posting history on SM is available to all of you.

If anything, I have been scrupulously consistent on this. On both sides.

You may not of said..the exact words...civillians..but you cannot deny you approve of their tactics and have always said what they do is justified because the were invaded..bombed..what ever..you've always done that scrum you cant sit here and deny that. no fucking way... again..you have your beliefs'..your entitled to them. Just like I am with mine...:tired:

[Scrumhalf]

I have NEVER approved of any terrorists tactics. Now, I am starting to resent these insinuations. You can't just come here and say "well, you have made these statements, but I'm too tired to point then out." SHOW ME.

I have always maintained that terrorism against civilians is pointless and self defeating and is not the right way to achieve one's goals, whatever they may be.