Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Office of Special Counsel Indicts 13 Russian Nationals for Election Interference

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Office of Special Counsel Indicts 13 Russian Nationals for Election Interference

    Pretty big news.

    The Justice Department on Friday indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian groups of violating criminal laws with the intent to interfere with "with U.S. elections and political processes", according to agency. According to the agency, "the indictment charges all of the defendants with conspiracy to defraud the United States, three defendants with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and five defendants with aggravated identity theft." The indictment says that some defendants "communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump campaign" without revealing their association with Russia. The indictment also says the defendants posted negative information about a number of candidates during the last general election. "Defendants operations included supporting the presidential campaign on then-candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaging Hillary Clinton" his Democratic rival, according to the indictment.

    Excerpts from the indictments:

    -> Defendants' operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign") and disparaging Hillary Clinton. Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities. Defendants also staged political rallies inside the United States, and while posing as U.S. grassroots entities and U.S. persons, and without revealing their Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation, solicited and compensated real U.S. persons to promote or disparage candidates. Some Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities.

    -> In order to carry out their activities to interfere in U.S. political and electoral processes without detection of their Russian affiliation, Defendants conspired to obstruct the lawful functions of the United States government through fraud and deceit, including by making expenditures in connection with the 2016 U.S. presidential election without proper regulatory disclosure; failing to register as foreign agents carrying out political activities within the United States; and obtaining visas through false and fraudulent statements.

    -> Defendants and their co-conspirators used their fictitious online personas to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election. They engaged in operations primarily intended to communicate derogatory information about Hillary Clinton, to denigrate other candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and to support Bernie Sanders and then-candidate Donald Trump.

    -> On or about February 10, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators internally circulated an outline of themes for future content to be posted to ORGANIZATION-controlled social media accounts. Specialists were instructed to post content that focused on "politics in the USA" and to "use any opportunity to criticize Hillary and the rest (except Sanders and Trump--we support them)."

    -> From at least April 2016 through November 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators, while concealing their Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation through false personas, began to produce, purchase, and post advertisements on U.S. social media and other online sites expressly advocating for the election of then-candidate Trump or expressly opposing Clinton. Defendants and their co-conspirators did not report their expenditures to the Federal Election Commission, or register as foreign agents with the U.S. Department of Justice.

    -> To pay for the political advertisements, Defendants and their co-conspirators established various Russian bank accounts and credit cards, often registered in the names of fictitious U.S. personas created and used by the ORGANIZATION on social media. Defendants and their co-conspirators also paid for other political advertisements using PayPal accounts.

    -> Beginning in at least 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators used, without lawful authority, the social security numbers, home addresses, and birth dates ofreal U.S. persons without their knowledge or consent. Using these means of stolen identification, Defendants and their co-conspirators opened accounts at a federally insured U.S. financial institution ("Bank I")

    -> Defendants and their co-conspirators purchased credit card and bank account numbers from online sellers for the unlawful purpose of evading security measures at PayPal, which used account numbers to verify a user's identity. Many of the bank account numbers purchased by Defendants and their co-conspirators were created using the stolen identities of real U.S. persons. After purchasing the accounts, Defendants and their co-conspirators submitted these bank account numbers to PayPal.


    ... Defendants and their co-conspirators thereafter destroyed evidence for the purpose of impeding the investigation. On or about September 13, 2017, KAVERZINA wrote in an email to a family member: "We had a slight crisis here at work: the FBI busted our activity (not a joke). So, I got preoccupied with covering tracks together with the colleagues." KAVERZINA further wrote, "I created all these pictures and posts, and the Americans believed that it was written by their people."


    Read More here:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/co...el_indicts_13/

  • #2
    "They posed as politically and socially active Americans, advocating for and against particular candidates. They established social media pages and groups to communicate with unwitting Americans."

    Comment


    • #3
      If this doesn’t exemplify the impacts of social engineering, I don’t know what does.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mofo View Post
        If this doesn’t exemplify the impacts of social engineering, I don’t know what does.
        Yep. It's the very definition of social engineering. The Russians study it and are the best at it. Many many Americans were duped. And many smart Americans at that.

        Comment


        • #5
          thats nothing. them fuckers are so sneaky they have bots that instigate shit so bad with # if the movement becomes big a real person will take it over.
          there a team of social media trackers for lack of better words that monitor a Russian activity and when the Vegas shooting happened they got real active with # mostly shit to divide us. all this media shit is driven to divide us and it works like a mother fucker.
          theres a new terroist and its social media. these thing are so smart they can reply and reply accurate with out you knowing its a bot. and like I said if it becomes big a real person will take it over,. I should of copied the info as I suck with words and can't explain how crazy it is. I use social media all the time but block or erase your ass if you post anything other then your kids - cars - guns personal shit vacations or what ever your into. I def dont get my news from it cuz before trump I was already calling it fake news.

          Comment


          • #6
            ^ Yep and they stoked the Black Lives Matter issue on twitter with propaganda. Anything to tear the US apart and make us fight each other is Russia's goal.

            Comment


            • #7
              They learned from the best. USA. We’ve been doing the same exact thing all around the world for many years.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Turbo3000 View Post
                They learned from the best. USA. We’ve been doing the same exact thing all around the world for many years.
                Typical US hater cuck. Go kneel and "play with your phone"... Beta. :D

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Turbo3000 View Post
                  They learned from the best. USA. We’ve been doing the same exact thing all around the world for many years.
                  When we do this, what is our intent? Are we doing it to harm another country and make them lose their faith in democracy? Or are we doing it in non-democratic countries while trying to help oust brutal dictators? I think there is a difference here in intent and motives when comparing to Russia's end goal.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We have a long and sordid history of interfering in countries that had leaders or we're about to elect leaders that we didn't like or that we're too independent in their thinking for our liking.

                    That being said, that does not mean we should just ignore what's happening here. We shouldn't interfere externally , just like nobody should interfere here


                    Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Keiser View Post
                      When we do this, what is our intent? Are we doing it to harm another country and make them lose their faith in democracy? Or are we doing it in non-democratic countries while trying to help oust brutal dictators? I think there is a difference here in intent and motives when comparing to Russia's end goal.
                      ha. seriously? it's always about US interests. the Shah of Iran is a perfect example. we don't give 2 fucks about brutal dictators unless those dictators threaten US interests or influence.

                      https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...3-iranian-coup

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                        ha. seriously? it's always about US interests. the Shah of Iran is a perfect example. we don't give 2 fucks about brutal dictators unless those dictators threaten US interests or influence.

                        https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...3-iranian-coup
                        I’m still waiting for an example where we have done this in another democracy.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Keiser View Post
                          I’m still waiting for an example where we have done this in another democracy.
                          I gave you one. He was democratically elected.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                            I gave you one. He was democratically elected.
                            You sure about that? The election was a farce, there were no competitors and a coup was staged to put the shah in power and he ruled for 26 years. Not exactly a democracy.

                            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953..._d%27%C3%A9tat

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yes I am.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X