Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

NYT Interview with Tim From the Military Arms Channel.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by lipripper View Post
    Dude..don't assume you know me and what I do.. you have no clue how I respect wildlife and the outdoors and or what I do to give back. You really don't.

    Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
    What the fuck? I simply asked if you have a pet, didn't make any type of assumption or accusation. (But you made an assumption, which is called projecting).

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Keiser View Post
      What the fuck? I simply asked if you have a pet, didn't make any type of assumption or accusation. (But you made an assumption, which is called projecting).
      yes I did because you went from one subject to a complete different direction on the conversation ..your fishing for something..:D

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by lipripper View Post
        yes I did because you went from one subject to a complete different direction on the conversation ..your fishing for something..:D
        Nah, just grew up in an environment where people said you need to kill animals to be a "real man", so wanted to counter that with that picture.

        Then I moved on, assumed you at least had a Labrador since you're a big duck hunter.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Keiser View Post
          Nah, just grew up in an environment where people said you need to kill animals to be a "real man", so wanted to counter that with that picture.

          Then I moved on, assumed you at least had a Labrador since you're a big duck hunter.
          so I guess you couldn't realize I was being sarcastic :agreed:

          I will admit when I was young..I was mad at them(its how I describe it) I'm not mad at them anymore and haven't been for many many years.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by lipripper View Post

            I will admit when I was young..I was mad at them(its how I describe it) I'm not mad at them anymore and haven't been for many many years.
            mad at a deer? animals mind their own business and aren't a cancer to the earth like humans are. I'm opposite of how you were in the sense that I've always had a distrust and anger towards humans but animals I always loved. i was raised by a single mom and we always had a dog from the day i was born so animals were a comfort to me while people couldn't be trusted.

            if you think about the world we live in, it's the humans that are the "animals".

            Comment


            • #21
              surprise surprise anti first amendment and second amendment youtube has shutdown MAC's channel. he has never ever advocated violence of any kind. the only thing he is guilty of is doing gun reviews and having a different opinion on guns from those that run youtube. sad days. YouTube is 100% for free speech as long as you agree with them!

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                surprise surprise anti first amendment and second amendment youtube has shutdown MAC's channel. he has never ever advocated violence of any kind. the only thing he is guilty of is doing gun reviews and having a different opinion on guns from those that run youtube. sad days. YouTube is 100% for free speech as long as you agree with them!
                Here is their statement, said they are disabling their Youtube channel for now due to leftists reporting the videos and triggering the YouTube bot to disable them until they are reviewed.

                https://www.instagram.com/p/BflvspXgcHb/?hl=en

                **Edit:

                And for the facts, if enough people report a video, then it automatically gets "disabled" by the YouTube bots, and of course they did it on a weekend, but it doesn't appear that Youtube is the one who banned the channel. It's just a giant leftist group organizing and all reporting the videos to trigger the "disabling" by the bot.

                If YouTube doesn't fix it on Monday then we can blame Youtube, but for now it's not accurate to point the finger at YouTube for this.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Keiser View Post
                  Here is their statement, said they are disabling their Youtube channel for now due to leftists reporting the videos and triggering the YouTube bot to disable them until they are reviewed.

                  https://www.instagram.com/p/BflvspXgcHb/?hl=en

                  **Edit:

                  And for the facts, if enough people report a video, then it automatically gets "disabled" by the YouTube bots, and of course they did it on a weekend, but it doesn't appear that Youtube is the one who banned the channel. It's just a giant leftist group organizing and all reporting the videos to trigger the "disabling" by the bot.

                  If YouTube doesn't fix it on Monday then we can blame Youtube, but for now it's not accurate to point the finger at YouTube for this.
                  read about what youtube has done to gun channels the last year bro. particularly james yeager. he is one of many that youtube is doing their best to push away. youtube has attacked gun channels directly the last 12 months. hickok had his channel taken down 6 months ago and MAC is in a constant fight to keep his up.

                  this particular instance is the left trying yet again to silence anyone they dont agree with. you are correct but youtube has attacked gun channels on multiple fronts for various bs reasons.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                    read about what youtube has done to gun channels the last year bro. particularly james yeager. he is one of many that youtube is doing their best to push away. youtube has attacked gun channels directly the last 12 months. hickok had his channel taken down 6 months ago and MAC is in a constant fight to keep his up.

                    this particular instance is the left trying yet again to silence anyone they dont agree with. you are correct but youtube has attacked gun channels on multiple fronts for various bs reasons.
                    I understand, but in this particular case let's not blame YouTube *yet*.

                    I'm curious to see what they do on this one as I personally follow the MAC channel and follow him on instagram as well.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      YouTube Banning Gun Channels - I've Disabled MAC for a short time.

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y50rwBtiZBU

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                        mad at a deer? animals mind their own business and aren't a cancer to the earth like humans are. I'm opposite of how you were in the sense that I've always had a distrust and anger towards humans but animals I always loved. i was raised by a single mom and we always had a dog from the day i was born so animals were a comfort to me while people couldn't be trusted.

                        if you think about the world we live in, it's the humans that are the "animals".
                        Mad....is a term dipshit...re read my post. It was a phrase I used..

                        Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by lipripper View Post
                          Mad....is a term dipshit...re read my post. It was a phrase I used..

                          Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
                          So explain it better. You said you were mad at them. Help me understand what that means.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Tim from Military Arms Responds To Trump..

                            There is nothing out of context here. What Trump is saying is that if your neighbor, who hates you because your dog pooped in his yard, calls the police and reports you as being a dangerous person, the police should be able to show up and confiscate your privately owned Constitutionally protected property then make you retain a lawyer and fight to regain your lost property and restore your rights.

                            Is he out of his mind? That’s a rhetorical question, I think the answer is obvious.

                            Trump also said that if Congress doesn’t act to ban “bump stocks” he will do it himself. That’s not how our Republic works, Dear Leader. You’re starting to sound like Little Rocket Man.

                            As for his “bump stock” ban, here’s the most recent proposed legislation he’s pushing for. This is the same wording the former ATF Firearms Technology Branch Chief I interviewed a while back said would be the wording of the NRA backed and Trump pushed ATF “bump stock” regulation. Take careful note, it makes no mention of “bump stocks”. Read it carefully and think just how many items could be defined, with a stroke of a pen and without an act of Congress, as a “rate increasing device”.

                            WAKE UP! Please stop making excuses for this man. He’s proving himself to be an enemy of the Bill of Rights and our Republic.

                            “H.R. 3999

                            This bill amends the federal criminal code to prohibit certain conduct with respect to any part or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle but does not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun.

                            Specifically, it makes it a crime to manufacture, possess, or transfer such device: (1) in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or (2) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

                            An individual who knowingly violates the prohibition is subject to criminal penalties—a fine, a prison term of up to five years, or both.

                            Additionally, the U.S. Sentencing Commission must review and amend the sentencing guidelines and policy statements to provide an enhanced penalty if the device has been: (1) used, carried, or possessed during or in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime; or (2) unlawfully smuggled into or from the United States.”

                            This man is off his rocker. He had Dianne Feinstein jumping for joy. If you think this is some 4D Checkers game and this inarticulate moron is somehow a great strategist... and this is some masterful rope-a-dope strategy, you’re not thinking clearly.

                            Start fighting NOW: https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Call the White House at (202)-456-1111 and tell President Trump to stop the assault on our Bill of Rights. He’s advocating for the destruction of the 2nd and 4th Amendments. If that number is busy, call 202-456-1414.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Tim talks about the state of the 2nd amendment, the NRA, uniting the firearm community, and YouTube bans on gun channels.

                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNFWkXLwv3I

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X