Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

The French Do Their Best To Stop Terrorist By Throwing Tiny Balls

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The French Do Their Best To Stop Terrorist By Throwing Tiny Balls

    "There were around 20 people chasing him. They started throwing petanque balls at him," Najah said. "Around four or five balls hit him in the head, but they weren't able to stop him."




    French police are not characterizing a knife rampage in a popular Paris tourist spot as a terror attack, a French Interior Ministry spokesman told CNN.

    Seven people were injured, including two middle-aged British tourists, in Sunday night's assault by a man wielding a knife and an iron bar, according to the spokesman.

    "This is not being treated as a terrorist attack," he said.

    The attack took place at 10:50 p.m. (4:50 p.m. ET) in the Parc de la Villette by the Ourcq Canal in the 19th arrondissement, a lively neighborhood in northeastern Paris popular with young people and tourists.

    A bystander fought off the attacker with balls from a petanque game, a local kind of bowling, until police arrived.

    Eyewitness Youssef Najah, 28, told Agence France-Presse he was walking along the canal near a bowling green when he saw a man running and holding a large knife.

    "There were around 20 people chasing him. They started throwing petanque balls at him," Najah said. "Around four or five balls hit him in the head, but they weren't able to stop him."

    According to the same witness, the attacker then dived into an alleyway, where the man "tried to hide behind two British tourists. We said to them: 'Watch out, he has a knife." But they didn't react."

    The pair were then attacked, he said.

    Sunday evening's attack was the latest in a stream of knife crimes in France recently.

    On August 23, a man stabbed his mother and sister to death and seriously injured another person in a town near Paris before police shot him and killed him.

    ISIS claimed responsibility for that attack, but French authorities said the 36-year-old had mental health problems and had been on their terror watch list since 2016.

    Ten days earlier an Afghan asylum-seeker was arrested in the southwestern French town of Perigueux after wounding four people in a drunken rampage, AFP reported.

    On June 17, two people were hurt in another southern town when a woman shouting "Allahu akbar" attacked them with a knife in a supermarket before being overpowered.

    The previous month, a 21-year-old Chechen-born French citizen armed with a knife killed one pedestrian and injured several more near the Palais Garnier, the opera house in Paris, before police shot him dead.

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/10/europ...ntl/index.html

  • #2
    lol throwing balls at them! You know this is what the extreme liberals would love to happen in our country.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
      lol throwing balls at them! You know this is what the extreme liberals would love to happen in our country.


      you just started an internet throw down!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
        lol throwing balls at them! You know this is what the extreme liberals would love to happen in our country.
        No, they don't.

        Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
          No, they don't.

          Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
          Scrum you just called yourself an extremist! :D I was setting you up!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
            Scrum you just called yourself an extremist! :D I was setting you up!
            Extreme liberal and proud of it! :D :thumup:

            Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

            Comment


            • #7
              what is your definition of extreme liberal scrum? give me something like the top 3 key factors that are most important to you. put it simply, not asking you to type out a book or anything. i'd like to see if i agree or disagree. i'm one of these people that finds myself on both sides of the isle often. when it comes to the environment, science, education and religion in general I'm probably very liberal. when it comes to the topics of guns and immigration i'm probably "right wing". i don't like titles because I don't really fit into either group. would that be considered independent? I've never really felt that i was in full agreement with any particular group of politics.

              Comment


              • #8
                My ideal political candidate, for Congress or for President, will have the following as central planks of their platform:

                1. Medicare for All - universal medical coverage for all. We are the only advanced country in the world that does not have universal healthcare.

                2. Free public college education. We are the only advanced country in the world where students leave with crushing college debt.

                3. No wars. The US has been at war nonstop for almost its entire existence. We just approved a defense bill for $720 billion per year.

                4. Living minimum wage. Minimum wage tied to inflation and is actually a living wage. Minimum wage has not kept up with inflation, while the wages of the CEO and the 1% have far exceeded that. It's the reason why the US has the largest ratio between the highest to lowest employee pay in the developed world.

                5. Elimination of the war on drugs.

                Actually, coming to think of it, these are what some people call "extreme liberal" or "progressive" positions. However, poll after poll has shown that these are overwhelmingly popular ACROSS THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM. For example, Medicare for All enjoys something like 70% approval. A majority of even republicans support it.

                None of these ideas is kooky or unaffordable or anything like that. I have data/vidoes that talk more about them if anyone is interested.

                If a politician throws away the democrat or republican label, and just runs on these issues, THEY WILL WIN! That's what Bernie tried to do. He didn't go and paint republican voters as bad or evil. He simply said - hey, I know that Joe or Jill Worker is hurting, regardless of political affiliation. Here's what I can do to help everyone across the board.

                The only reason NO mainstream politician other than Bernie at the Presidential level wants to adopt this platform (lots of Congresspersons support it like Ro Khanna) is that they are too afraid to piss off their big donors - pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, etc.

                If anyone is genuinely interested, I can talk more about any of these issues.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm genuinely interested.

                  So on the no wars issue. If you were President and you found yourself in an extreme situation like what started WW2. Would you totally stay out of it like a Switzerland type situation or would you say there are times when war is necessary?

                  second question. we are already in massive debt. who would pay for all the free things like health care, education, and minimum wage? California for example is already stretched to the limit on taxing residents. i assume you would cut the military budget in half? what would you do if an enemy nation (China/Russia) doubled their military budget and became more hostile while we cut ours in half? wouldn't a weakened military be a concern of yours?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    btw scrum..

                    i'm not attacking you or trying to argue but i honestly believe that this is a case where political reality trumps political theory. Thomas Jefferson comes to mind as i was reading Twilight at Monticello not too long ago. he was deeply distrustful of big brother and big military. once he became president and a Navy flagship was seized (a comparison today would be a nuclear sub being seized) he realized his ideals didn't match the reality he was faced with. he strengthened the military and expanded the size of the nation even though it was not in-line with his life long view and moral code. he later said "duty to national interest transcends philosophical consistency."

                    i realize i'm giving you a bunch of "what ifs" but they are important and not at all outside the realm of possibility. i also realize Jefferson is easy to criticize do to his inconsistency with slaves and other matters but thats besides the point.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Pretty busy at work all day, so I'll try to respond tonight. Can't do justice to this while sitting in a meeting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X