I was doing some reading on Palumbos cutting diet and it says to do between 30-90 minutes of pwo steady rate cardio, would u say to drink the pwo shake of whey and pb after 40 minutes of that or just do the full 60 minutes or so and then the pwo shake?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
? about Palumbos diet
Collapse
X
-
So then u that its less important to get ur protein in within that 40 minute window after u lift if ur trying to cut up (staying in the fat burning zone longer)? Im not agreeing or disagreeing, i posted the question cause im not sure, im just curious as to why u reason that way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dinho10 View PostSo then u that its less important to get ur protein in within that 40 minute window after u lift if ur trying to cut up (staying in the fat burning zone longer)? Im not agreeing or disagreeing, i posted the question cause im not sure, im just curious as to why u reason that way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dinho10 View PostOk, i ll hold off till after. When u say that theres more leeway to that window than 40 minutes, how much time do u think would be overkill/diminishing returns? Thanks for the replies, guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dinho10 View PostOk, i ll hold off till after. When u say that theres more leeway to that window than 40 minutes, how much time do u think would be overkill/diminishing returns? Thanks for the replies, guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3v1lj03 View PostI am by no means an expert on post workout nutrition. But, read a lot of studies and I am sure I have read recently that as long as the protein is consumed within 2 hours you still get all the benefits that you do in the first 30 minutes. I have to tell you that I have been doing cardio this way for a few weeks and I love the results.
Comment
-
maybe I'm wrong but I don't agree with doing steady state cardio. (Bouncer will love this) A study has shown that HIIT cardio is superior to steady state cardio with respect to post exercise oxygen consumption. HIIT cardio elevates it for up to 48 hours, which means there's more fat burning potential. Not to mention that steady state cardio only trains slow twitch (type I) fibers and a study has also shown that with prolonged endurance exercise fast twitch (type II) fibers can be converted to slow twitch fibers. Steady state cardio might be counterproductive to muscle growth. Think about this - who carries more muscle mass? A marathon runner or a sprinter? Most obviously the sprinter - they have huge quads and hams, yet they are as lean as their distance running counterparts. Given the choice I'd rather look like the sprinter and sprinters train using high intensity intervals - it's the nature of what they do.Last edited by gdbear65; 10-28-08, 05:57 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdbear65 View Postmaybe I'm wrong but I don't agree with doing steady state cardio. (Bouncer will love this) A study has shown that HIIT cardio is superior to steady state cardio with respect to post exercise oxygen consumption. HIIT cardio elevates it for up to 48 hours, which means there's more fat burning potential. Not to mention that steady state cardio only trains slow twitch (type I) fibers and a study has also shown that with prolonged endurance exercise fast twitch (type II) fibers can be converted to slow twitch fibers. Steady state cardio might be counterproductive to muscle growth. Think about this - who carries more muscle mass? A marathon runner or a sprinter? Most obviously the sprinter - they have huge quads and hams, yet they are as lean as their distance running counterparts. Given the choice I'd rather look like the sprinter and sprinters train using high intensity intervals - it's the nature of what they do.
Comment
-
-
Comment