Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Eat Six Times a Day? The Dangers of Frequent Eating.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eat Six Times a Day? The Dangers of Frequent Eating.

    By Dr. John Douillard, DC

    Do you wake up and prepare six small healthy meals and pack them individually in Tupperware or plastic baggies?

    I don’t! Neither did our ancestors and, contrary to what you may have been told, neither did the hunter gatherers. For them, it was feast or famine. Our very presence as a species is due to the fact that humans were able to endure long periods of time without food.

    Now, grazing and eating frequent small meals are being touted as health-beneficial practices. But with food on every corner, have we lost our ability to tolerate missing a meal? In this newsletter I will share the risks and potential dangers of eating six meals a day and the amazing benefits of eating three.

    Please read on as I ruffle some feathers in the Grazing Camp!

    What Kind of Fuel is your Body Burning?

    When we talk about “burning fat,” what we are actually referring to is the process of using fat as our fuel, our source of energy. It’s a chemical process, not just a metaphor for losing weight. But fat is only one kind of fuel that can be utilized by our bodies, and carbohydrates —or sugars— are another. When your body has both available, it will burn the sugars first and the fat second.

    Fat Burning Benefits

    As it turns out, burning fat has a plethora of benefits beyond weight management.

    Fat is the most precious source of fuel for the body. It is the body’s calm, non-emergency fuel. It burns slowly and steadily, providing energy for many hours straight. By contrast, sugar burns quickly. Sugar and carbohydrate fuels provide quick bursts of energy that often crash.

    Burning fat detoxifies us and neutralizes excess acids that build up from stress. The problem is that many of us have lost the ability to burn fat effectively and are chronically storing fat and gaining weight.

    Six Meals a Day for Weight Loss and Consistent Energy?

    When the body is fed every 2-3 hours, it will burn fuel from those meals rather than its fat stores. So instead of burning stored fat between meals the way we were designed, the body enjoys having meals delivered every 2-3 hours. If the meals are small, frequent and healthy, the body won’t store any fat from those meals and, in theory, have energy all day and never gain weight.

    Here’s the rub: when being fed every 2-3 hours the body will not be encouraged to burn any of its stored fat for energy, either. Why should it bother digging out the fat stores for energy when it is being spoon-fed all day long?

    When you eat three meals a day and have ample time between meals, the body is forced to burn that stored fat. Once the fat is restored as an active fuel supply you will see better energy, more stable moods, greater mental clarity, better sleep, less cravings and of course, natural and permanent weight management.

    A Study

    I did a study based on my book The 3-Season Diet in 2000. We had the group eat three meals a day with no snacks and measured weight loss and a host of psychological factors. Within two weeks their moods, cravings, sleep, exhaustion after work and fatigue were all significantly improved. And they lost an average of 1.2 pounds per week for the 2 month study.

    How to Burn Fat All Day Long

    Eating breakfast, lunch and supper with no snacks in between will provide a natural fast in between meals that will encourage fat metabolism.

    When I was growing up, all the kids on my block had an early supper around 5:30 p.m. After supper, we played for a while and then came inside and went to bed. There were no bed time snacks – the kitchen closed at 6 p.m. sharp. We would wake up and have breakfast around 7 a.m. and then walk 10 miles to school in the snow. Just kidding! But that was 13 hours straight with no food. We slept through the night fasting and broke the fast with break-fast. That means that every night, we reset fat metabolism. This allowed us to maintain normal blood sugar, stable moods and overall greater health than what is created by the cultural habits I see today.

    What About “Healthy” Snacks?

    If you have a healthy snack, like a carrot, in between breakfast and lunch you will burn the carrot but you will not burn any stored fat between those two meals. If you don’t snack between lunch and supper, your body will be forced to burn stored fat to get you to supper without a blood sugar crash.

    From supper to breakfast is a critical time to burn fat, lose weight, detox and reboot a stable nervous system to handle the stress of the next day.

    Many folks have a major blood sugar crash between 3 and 6 p.m. They crave chocolate, a nap, chips or coffee. This blood sugar crash can be balanced with a shift in how we eat.

    Take time to have a large relaxing breakfast—make that meal big enough to get you to lunch without the need of a snack. Then make lunch the main meal of the day and see how much food you need to get to supper without a snack. Make supper count and see if you can eat nothing after supper until bedtime. Then, wake up and break the fast with breakfast.

    The Risk and Danger of Frequent Meals

    Experts touting six meals a day, or what some call the “3 hour diet,” say eating every three hours will rev up your metabolism, control blood sugar, decrease hunger and create weight loss. Fortunately or unfortunately, experts are having a hard time finding any studies to support these claims.

    The Theory Behind 6 Meals a Day

    One of the main themes in support of eating six meals a day posits that it will keep the body’s metabolism up, thus increasing thermogenesis (fat burning), resulting in weight loss. There are many studies disputing this notion. 1n 1997, the British Journal of medicine did a thorough review of all such related studies and found no evidence that eating 6 meals a day increases metabolism, thermogenesis, or weight loss (1).
    One of the other arguments behind the 6 meal a day plan is that if you eat 6 small healthy meals a day, the appetite and hunger at each meal will be less. This may help some dieters control hunger and calorie intake. However, the American Dietetic Association (ADA) advises that the more frequently one eats when just slightly hungry, the higher the risk for over-eating, suggesting that this as an unreliable strategy.
    Finally, perhaps the Holy Grail of the 6-meals-a-day supporters is its effect on balancing blood sugar. If you open a medical text book and look up “hypoglycemia,” a condition that involves the blood sugar regularly crashing, you will see a recommendation to eat small meals throughout the day as a dietary medicine. It also suggests that once the blood sugar is brought back into balance, one would return to eating 3 regular meals.
    America has been diagnosed with hypoglycemia and prescribed “6 meals a day” as a medicine. The problem is, we are not being told how to get off the medicine and return to the healthier three meals a day. Folks who have blood sugar issues tend to eat poor quality meals and snacks full of simple carbs, sugars, stimulants, processed fats and comfort foods.

    True, eating frequent small meals a day will curb the highs and lows of the blood sugar and help them feel more stable, in the short term. I have many patients who report initially feeling great on the 6-meal a day plan. They started losing some weight, their anxiety levels, energy and cravings were improving. Then, within 6-9 months the results often slowed down. They soon started feeling hungry all the time, the weight came back on, and the anxiety and mood sensitivity were all of a sudden worse.

    Food Dependency

    When you eat every 2-3 hours, your body becomes dependent on a constant supply of food. The body will lose its built-in ability to tolerate missing a meal, and the blood sugar will crash and often crash hard.

    In 2002, the New York Academy of Sciences published a report stating that all-day grazing can put you at risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. The risk increases when insulin spikes after eating foods that have high glycemic values. If you eat only three meals a day, (even high-glycemic ones), your insulin levels have time to even out, says Victor Zammit, head of cell biochemistry at Hannah Research Institute in Ayr, Scotland. Conversely, if you eat high glycemic foods between meals, your insulin levels stay dangerously high.

    Transitioning from Many Small Meals to Three

    Most cultures around the world still practice 2-3 meals a day without snacking. For most westerners who have become accustomed to snacking, having three meals a day will be a transition. Our western diet is loaded with short chain carbs, sugars and fast burning processed foods. Give yourself some time to make this transition. You can even start with four meals to make it easier.

    Remember: we are making you into a good fat burner once again. This will balance your blood sugar and stave off a host of degenerative and inflammatory diseases.


    Here are a couple of tips to make the transition easier:

    - Drink lots of water between each meal.

    - When you eat: relax, dine and enjoy the meal before you.

    - Start with four meals a day and work down to three.

    - Make each meal count and try to make lunch the main meal.

    - Avoid late night meals.

    - Eat whole foods rather than processed foods.



    Enjoy,

    Dr. John

  • #2
    Thoughts on this? I am a bit conflicted. For the average person trying to lose weight or just be healthy I feel this article is fine. Just dont think its relevant for a bodybuilder especially a bodybuilder on AAS or HGH etc..

    Comment


    • #3
      Was this taken from the book, "Primal Blueprint?"

      In theory it makes sense. I'm with you, just in theory.

      Comment


      • #4
        This article talks about an average person who eats high caloric six meals or snacks. For a bodybuilder idea behind six meals is the feed the muscle with proper amount of protein and have enough carbs and fat to keep the body burning it's fat storage. What this guy doesn't realize is that an average person doesn't plan his or her diet as, 250 gr protein 150 gr carbs and 50 gr of healthy fat. And if you total that it's just over 2000 calories which is just fine for losing weight if you add some excercise to your daily routine.

        Comment


        • #5
          The guy's a DC. That's a chiropractor.

          /thread

          Comment


          • #6
            A DC writing on nutrition? The guy's own area is full of shit. The only chiros worth anything are those masquerading as a physical therapist.

            I repeat: THE ONLY CHIROS WHO ARE WORTH ANYTHING ARE THE ONES THAT DO THE STUFF THAT PHYSICAL THERAPISTS DO.

            In which case, why not just go to a PT? At least they receive professional training in their area of specialty.

            Chiros.. :disagree: I guess we should ask the guy his opinion on relativistic quantum theory as well while we are at it.

            Comment


            • #7
              That was keiser and bouncer. Not me. They were making fun of me when I was premed for dc ;)

              Comment


              • #8
                rado, your father was a good man and a good provider, i am sure of it.

                but what he did is not backed by real science. its a nonsense profession based on nonsense.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Post
                  rado, your father was a good man and a good provider, i am sure of it.

                  but what he did is not backed by real science. its a nonsense profession based on nonsense.
                  I was just about to post the exact same thing.

                  I'm not impugning your dad's character. I am sure he was, just like many chiros, a perfectly honorable guy.

                  However, the fact of the matter is that chriropractic is based on absolute nonsense. The basic premise is that there are subluxations or misalignments of the vertebrae are the cause of all the ills of the body. There is no scientific basis for such a claim.

                  In fact, this inevitable realization that the basic premise of chiropractic is flawed, has led to a bifurcation of chiropractors into straights and mixers. Straights follow the original teachings to the letter while mixers incorporate various amounts of mainstream medicine into their practice.

                  It is this latter group, the mixers, that have even a marginal chance of actually doing anything useful. In fact, the mixers that have the most likelihood of doing any good are the ones that are in effect doing physical therapy based on sound scientific methods. In other words, they are essentially physical therapists.

                  And all the other stuff about me being an Internet warrior, etc. Not even sure where to go with that one. Sure, I am not an MD but I'm not writing articles on the best way to treat gliomas either.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rado
                    You're right....Some Chiros are good for nothing, or the specialty of being a DC is good for nothing....You base this off google and wiki; right:rolleyes:

                    Not even going to debate this with someone who truly knows nothing about DC, but rather bases his "knowledge" off what he reads off google/wiki/and he said she said articles.

                    lol....If you know so much, why even bother being here and not just become someone of an important figure for this country. I lol when ALL of us come on here thinking they know it all; you of all people too.
                    What does it matter where my knowledge comes from as long as it is the correct knowledge? Google, tv, etc..

                    Correct knowledge is correct knowledge no matter if the info comes from a homeless person or a top university. Facts are facts.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      P.S I was in a chiro office once and he had a zodiac sign chart in his office. That about sums it up for me. Lmao

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Chiro's have hurt people, that's a known fact. Hell, my ex husbands lumbar spine was herniated from going to one. Don't take it as a personal attack. Some people swear by them. :)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Back to the topic, I am a lil confused also. Reading that makes sence but so does the 6 meals a day. I'm gonna go with what beast said might be good for normal peeps but not someone trying to be 250lbs of muscle

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ohier shit placebo effect

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Small regular meals have proved effective for decades

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X