Calling on the vets...again

[spidey]

Originally posted by vicmack777
Couldnt have said it better myself.

BTW....Spidey, I wasnt laughing at you, I was laughing at myself with the comment about cholesterol. Not at you.

Let's review:

I warned the original poster (rippedsucka) that M1T was a very harsh AAS and probably not for beginners.

You immediately come on and correct me.

Originally posted by vicmack777
M1T is not an AAS. Its a PS (pro-steroid).

Unsure if you understand exactly what a prosteroid is, I define it for you in my next post.

Originally posted by Spidey A "prosteroid" is simply an anabolic steroid that is legal. The term is used to distinguish legal from illegal anabolic steroids as opposed to prohormones which are converted in the body to a more active steroid. M1T is an AAS in every sense of the word. It is not converted into anything else in the body; it is in it's active form to begin with. It's legal status has nothing to do with it's biological activity.[/B]

Now, it is clear from the passage quoted above that I am separating the legal status of M1T from it's biological activity as an AAS. If all you were trying to say was that you (in Viral's words) "understand chemically it is a AAS, but if u were to talk about it with someone, discuss it, use a word for it, PH will have to do because that is the way its sold.", my definition above should have ended the misunderstanding. Instead, you press ahead in your attempt to convince me that M1T is not an AAS.

Originally posted by vicmack777 If you want to split hairs, cholesterol is a steroid also. How many sample cycles have you seen with cholesterol as a part of the cycle.

Nobody really considers M1T as an AAS. Thats my point. Do you consider 1-test as an AAS?[/B]

At this point, I get exasperated and a little pissy about getting laughed at and post my somewhat lengthy reply explaining in detail why 1-test is an AAS.

You say you weren't laughing at me...OK, I can give you the benefit of the doubt there. It's cool.

On the issue of what you believed about M1T and 1-Test, don't piss on my head and tell me it's raining. You came on a thread in which I was giving legitamite safety advice to a newbie about the harshness of M1T just to correct me on it's legal status (since we seem to agree that chemically it is an AAS)? Somehow, I don't think so. You thought I was just wrong and you would set me straight, LOL.

Even if, by some stretch of the imagination, you were indeed just correcting me on the semantics of AAS vs. prosteroid, what does that have to do with the advice I gave Rippedsucka?

Whatever....

This is starting to get silly. This thread was started as a legit question by someone wanting advice and has evolved into this tit for tat petty argument. I don't see any reason to keep this going any further. I'm done.

[Primal Instinct]

I personally would definitely classify M1T as a steroid. 1-Test as well. People generally don't consider orals or transdermals to be steroids but they can be. Legality issues aside, they both can make a significant impact on one's physique if used correctly. It's just that they are in a legal loophole- a no man's land of "supplement"- and it's just a matter of time until they are scheduled as a Class III drug too.