Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Bad Creatines?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bad Creatines?

    Discovered a very well written article from:
    http://www.t-nation.com/findArticle....icle=295naked2

    Check it out, its some good info. Although im not going to say whats what, its something to take into consideration.

    "Main part of the article regaurding this post"
    Dangerous Creatine?

    No, this isn’t the tagline for a new type of creatine, it means that there’s a semi-popular creatine-like product on the market that may actually be harmful to your health. What’s worse is that there are now several copycat products on the market as well! As if that wasn’t bad enough, one of the potentially dangerous compounds (oh yes, there’s more than one!) that this product contains is ergolytic; i.e. something that decreases athletic performance.

    This potentially dangerous ergolytic chemical is Guanidinopropionic Acid (GPA), which binds the creatine transporter and plugs it up so creatine can’t be transported into various tissues (similar to the concept of tamoxifen blocking the estrogen receptor, not allowing estrogen to bind). This is a problem, because most of our tissues can’t make creatine so it has to be transported in, and blocked transporters means a reduction in cellular creatine levels.

    Bear in mind that creatine isn’t just a supplement, it’s a naturally occurring substance in our bodies that we need to survive! You know the impact of having 20% more creatine, now imagine having 80% less creatine! GPA induced creatine depletion can not only reduce muscle strength after a mere seven days of consumption (Gagnon et al., 2002), but has also been shown to convert fast-twitch muscle to slow-twitch (Ren et al., 1995)! So this substance might make you weaker and slower!

    While these consequences should be enough to make you avoid supplements containing this chemical, there’s also a potentially dangerous side to consider: both our hearts and our brains have creatine transporters!!! Any time you start to mess around with our two most vital organs, it can’t be good. Fortunately, the brain seems to temporarily compensate for decreases in energy supply caused by GPA (O'Gorman et al., 1996), but do we really want our bodies to have to adapt to reduced energy levels? Of course not!

    We also don’t want our hearts to be affected by GPA supplementation, but they are! In fact, 3 different studies showed that creatine levels in the heart dropped by 80-87% with GPA consumption in rats (Boehm et al., 2003, Neubauer et al., 1999; Horn et al., 2001). Now you can see why it’s nearly impossible to perform human studies using this substance! Clearly, you have to wonder what the manufacturers were thinking when they approved production of this supplement.

    "But wait, there’s MORE! Order now and you’ll get another potentially dangerous ingredient for free!" One particular supplement ("SWOLE") combines GPA with another potentially dangerous substance known as Glycocyamine (G-amine). Sadly, G-amine (also known as guanidinoacetate) has been picked up by a few different supplement companies who obviously don’t do any research on what they’re getting people to ingest.

    The reason G-amine is so popular (from a marketing standpoint, not from the consumers’) is because it is the precursor to creatine. Just like Testosterone can come from andro, creatine comes from G-amine. The theory is that you jack up G-amine levels and you get a whole bunch more creatine. The really asinine part is that, you can just directly take creatine!

    We can’t take Testosterone due to legal reasons, so we have to find other ways to increase its levels—enter prohormones (among other effective things). But for our purposes, there’s no reason to worry about creatine precursors because we can just take the substance directly. The whole precursor concept is really hot when it comes to marketing to laymen, which is where this supplement takes off.

    Unfortunately, consuming this chemical seems to have the undesirable effect of elevating blood levels of a substance called homocysteine, which is a very strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease (Stead et al., 2001). Cardiovascular disease is easily the number one killer in the Western World, and the last thing we need to do is increase our risk for it. Conversely, taking creatine decreases homocysteine levels, raising even more therapeutic possibilities for this supplement. As if to spit on your grave, if you’re supplementing with creatine, G-amine may also decrease its uptake by muscles (Zugno et al., 2003).

    So this being said, look at ur nutrition facts...I know that swole v2 and swole v12 both contain 1 or both of the "bad" chemicles. There are also more creatines im sure.

    ALL INFO ABOVE TAKEN FROM THE LINK I GAVE U FROM THE ARTICLE AT T-MAG.

  • #2
    Be weary of information gathered from T-Mag.....

    Comment


    • #3
      Best kind of creatine has a small label "CreaPure" on it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well Yellow whats ur opinion on this whole take?

        Im defineatly out for more outlooks/facts. One thing I do believe out of that article is about the creatine precursor thing. Why would u use a precursor when u can just take it directly? Seems logical to me, and we all know companies do anything to sell nowndays. Besides that about the GPA, I just wouldnt want to take any chances at all for just a little extra pump. Its hard to say what to believe nowndays....

        Comment


        • #5
          Seems a lot of companies are added this stuff into there cell volumizing mix. V-12 comes to mind. Here's an article from shpongled at bulknutrition.com regarding glycocyamine. It seems it's better to stay away from it.

          http://www.bulknutrition.com/?ingredients_id=39

          Comment


          • #6
            That article is very true. I have also read in many different places about GPA being unhealthy. I know a nutrition store owner that discontinued v12 and swole because he also found out it was bad for you.

            Thx for the article.

            Comment


            • #7
              So, what is the best creatine product? I hate the gritty texture of the plain monohydrate and it upsets my stomach too.

              What about the tricreatine maleate? Is that gritty and insoluble in everything too?

              Comment


              • #8
                Hmmm u dont like the grittynes of creatine..Have u tried mixing it in a blender for better mixing and using more of whatever liquid ur putting it in? Even try Milk seeing as its thick and smooth to counteract the grit.

                I dont know about the other stuff, never tried it and wont due to the article and how supp companies combine it.

                Best creatine is just reg creatine. There are also brands that combine reg creatine with ALA and such which are good as well, maybe u should give Trac a try. Ive heard good things about it and it doesnt cary GPA and no precursor.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I found a brand at 1fast400 that is pure tricreatine maleate; no G-amine or GPA.

                  Yes, I tried a blender and lots of liquid. That stuff is like sand. It won't dissolve in anything and is gritty. It settles out of my shakes over time and creatine monohydrate seems to upset my stomach too.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Spidey an update on my report. G-Amine isnt as bad as we so thought, well sans v12 isnt. Its a bit different, has a bit diff name/structure, and is used more so for ppl that dont respond to creatine. So if ur a non responder V12 is actually a good product.

                    As for that being said, Im intersted to see what u foind off of ifast

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's a product called CUBED made by SANS. It is just tricreatine maleate. I read a review though that says it doesn't mix very well so it may have the same problem as the monohydrate.

                      Why is V12 a good product? Doesn't the G-amine increase homocystein levels? The last thing we need is to increase our risk for heart disease. What is the structure of the G-amine in V12 and how is it different than what you were previously describing? No need to dumb it down for me; I am a chemist so structures are right up my ally. :D

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I seem to respond best to pur un-flavored pure monohydrate

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X