ive read alot of debate on this matter and hope to get it concentrated into one thread... so, ill give my opinion on the matter, which is entirely based on my own experiences in the gym. Many argue that flies are good for mass. Others say that packing meat on is all about presses. i think this needs to be clarified! obviously, everyone will react differently to different exersizes, making it difficult to come to a conclusion. In my experience, flies have added a lot of size to my chest..... however, its all along the outter portion . This, i recently have realised, has made my chest awkwardly proportioned- my mass lies mostly in the upper, outer part of my chest, leaving the inner part looking small by comparison. i believe this is because flies target the chest better than presses however, most of the fibers that are worked are along the outter portion. If flies make up the bulk of a chest workout, the chest will grow out of proportion, leaving the ¨clevage¨ looking small. So, whats everyones opinion on the matter? Dont get me wrong, i love flies but in my opinion, if you use them too much, youll get an awkward chest...
Announcement
Collapse
FLIES VS. PRESSES
Collapse
X
-
Re: FLIES VS. PRESSES
well it depends on what you are using for flyes. if you are using dumbells then the contraction as you get to the apex of the movement becomes hardly anything since it is horizontal movement. if you are using a machine then you should be able to get a nice full contraction that will stimulate the whole chest. the old nautilus 10 degree incline flye machine was perfect. it had pads the fit in your elbow joint so it would take your arms out of the movement and let you contract soley with your chest.Originally posted by Jordan
ive read alot of debate on this matter and hope to get it concentrated into one thread... so, ill give my opinion on the matter, which is entirely based on my own experiences in the gym. Many argue that flies are good for mass. Others say that packing meat on is all about presses. i think this needs to be clarified! obviously, everyone will react differently to different exersizes, making it difficult to come to a conclusion. In my experience, flies have added a lot of size to my chest..... however, its all along the outter portion . This, i recently have realised, has made my chest awkwardly proportioned- my mass lies mostly in the upper, outer part of my chest, leaving the inner part looking small by comparison. i believe this is because flies target the chest better than presses however, most of the fibers that are worked are along the outter portion. If flies make up the bulk of a chest workout, the chest will grow out of proportion, leaving the ¨clevage¨ looking small. So, whats everyones opinion on the matter? Dont get me wrong, i love flies but in my opinion, if you use them too much, youll get an awkward chest...
the second point I want to make is that adding mass using a particular movement is more about genetics than the movement. me personally, I can't use presses with a barbell. I get absolutley no contraction in my chest when i do that, so there is no point in doing them. I use crossovers, flyes, and some hammer strength for my chest. usually shorter guys with shorter arms and barrell chests are the guys who swear by the bench press and that is how it should be because they are built to be good at it.
-
Flyes can definately add pec mass.If you want them to affec t your inner chest moreturn your hands in at the top of the movement.It will give you a better contraction.You may have to lighten the load at first.To settle the whole debate just do what you respond to best.You are the one training for YOU only. Train hard bro !!
Comment
-
very good responses. i agree about what stonecold said about bench. my arms are long and i cant seem to get a good workout with barbell bench (i like widegrip though). when i noticed my inner chest lagging i began using the incline fly machine with a pad placed behind my back on top of the back of the seat to stretch my chest even more. then, on contraction, i squeeze for a good 2-3 seconds, making sure i feel a good burn in the middle of my chest.
Comment
-
well its different for everyone. if your joints are more likely to injure than id steer clear of rotating weights. maybe you could try lighter weight to see how your joints react. play it safe, an injury can set you way back.Originally posted by Jordan
im always reluctant to use exersises with ¨spinning¨ movements such as arnold presses, sinse they are often tough on your joints. does anyone know how safe this technique is? i ask because my joints injure easily... thanks,
j
Comment
-
I'm one of those that benching never worked for, I'd feel almost no pec contraction. Using dumbbells worked better but for me the best was to sit upright on a bench/chair in the cable station. Put the pulleys at shoulder level and press just like dumbbell presses. I felt an extreme contraction that was painful in a good way. After these I do incline dumbbell presses.
Comment

Comment